so the club asked him to dope but only within a limited budget? Wouldnt he have a great cause to blackmail the club into a payout or to retain his jub?It seems he exceeded his doping budget significantly though, ergo, legitimate termination reason.
he clearly said no banned substances were used to his knowledge. This is basically the same as saying none were used because he could never comment on things he didnt knowNo your argument is a lie, because he never once said what you claim he did.
Now, i have seen you state that you believe they were given TB4, now how exactly does that work?