Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
he's aged in his time away with injury, I remember him as baby faced
He's still looking pretty fresh, at least compared to the haggard creature I briefly saw in the mirror this morning. And Jamie seems to smile a lot more these days, seems happier on the footy field, which pleases me.
I think you're impacting my mirror as well.
Not sure that I'm willing to accept blame as the origin of a gathering zombie apocalypse. Your bathroom mirror might be experiencing its own difficulties.
The horror, the horror...
* off Melbourne.Melbourne going after Jamie.
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/demons-make-offer-for-magpie-jamie-elliott-20190912-p52qqm.html
Article also states the Demons favoured to get Tom Langdon but as it says he plays for Freo I think they mean Ed.
Melbourne going after Jamie.
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/demons-make-offer-for-magpie-jamie-elliott-20190912-p52qqm.html
Article also states the Demons favoured to get Tom Langdon but as it says he plays for Freo I think they mean Ed.
I would like to keep him tbh. Who do we have to cover for him as a genuine forward threat?Imagine playing for that pissant club.
Anyway in all seriousness, if Elliot leaves whatever imo. We simply cannot afford to over pay someone like him, we have plenty to cover with and much bigger players to worry about where our coin goes.
It could be good for both Elliot (security and dollars) and club (cap)
What??!! The guy has been the most explosive player in our forward line and has shown his best form in years, yet you think we can easily do without him. Given how injury prone our star players are, we can hardly afford to lose a player of Elliott's calibre. We have Stephenson as a potential regular, but De Goey sits out far more games than he plays. Other than them, we do not not have 'plenty to cover for him'. Personally I would be hoping that Elliott figures he owes the club for sticking by him and remains for unders.Imagine playing for that pissant club.
Anyway in all seriousness, if Elliot leaves whatever imo. We simply cannot afford to over pay someone like him, we have plenty to cover with and much bigger players to worry about where our coin goes.
It could be good for both Elliot (security and dollars) and club (cap)
No! No I wouldn't!No way does he go to Melbourne.Would you want to go to a shambles of a club like that?
That’s what happens when you have good players, can’t keep them all.What??!! The guy has been the most explosive player in our forward line and has shown his best form in years, yet you think we can easily do without him. Given how injury prone our star players are, we can hardly afford to lose a player of Elliott's calibre. We have Stephenson as a potential regular, but De Goey sits out far more games than he plays. Other than them, we do not not have 'plenty to cover for him'. Personally I would be hoping that Elliott figures he owes the club for sticking by him and remains for unders.
Why else do you think Melbourne are raising it now?No way he is going to leave us for Melbourne unless they throw the kitchen sink at him.
Ffs can't the AFL ban overtures to players until the season is over? This is going to be a distraction now for our premiership push and we don't need any distractions.