Jared Polec

Remove this Banner Ad

PowerBaz said:
Time to end this thread isn't it.
Click to expand...

Considering he hasn't been traded yet, maybe we might just go ahead and keep it open. You don't have to click on it if you don't want to.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

TheFVK said:
559274_f59d857248d9b365e09c8043b9c95bf7.png


How smug will we be when we get pick 10 for Polec.. why be aspirational when we can be realistic
Click to expand...
Didn't he want to go play in Melbourne?
Can't ship him off to the Gold Coast if he doesn't want to go...
 
dav3 said:
Just means there would be other teams involved in the trade, with #3 ultimately heading to the Crows (assuming it's true)
Click to expand...

Like who?
Reading the tweet (I know, it's dangerous considering who's tweeting it) there's no talk of a third club.
And if there was a third club involved the tweet would be worded differently IMHO - even from the prawns at 7.
 
Port should jump in on that trade. Doesn't your club have Wingard on the table?

Port: 3 & 17 (Gold Coast)
Gold Coast: Wingard + 11 & 46 (Port)
North: Polec + 29 (Gold Coast)

This values Wingard at ~ pick 7-8 for Gold Coast.

Port snags Rankine/Lukosious, still has pick 8-9 (Rozee/Hately), and picks up 17 as well.

Port draft: 3, 8-9, 17, 21, 27, 45
Gold Coast draft: 2, 11, 26, 38, 41, 46
 
Snake_Baker said:
Port should jump in on that trade. Doesn't your club have Wingard on the table?

Port: 3 & 17 (Gold Coast)
Gold Coast: Wingard + 11 & 46 (Port)
North: Polec + 29 (Gold Coast)

This values Wingard at ~ pick 7-8 for Gold Coast.

Port snags Rankine/Lukosious, still has pick 8-9 (Rozee/Hately), and picks up 17 as well.

Port draft: 3, 8-9, 17, 21, 27, 45
Gold Coast draft: 2, 11, 26, 38, 41, 46
Click to expand...
Except Wingard wouldn’t agree to that. Too far away from his family and his ‘brothers’ Impey and Jacko.
 
DSL64 said:
Like who?
Reading the tweet (I know, it's dangerous considering who's tweeting it) there's no talk of a third club.
And if there was a third club involved the tweet would be worded differently IMHO - even from the prawns at 7.
Click to expand...

So do the maths........... if he wouldn't want to go to Gold Coast, but pick 3 is involved, there must be other clubs involved.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

dav3 said:
So do the maths........... if he wouldn't want to go to Gold Coast, but pick 3 is involved, there must be other clubs involved.
Click to expand...
Do the math?
Read the tweet again. There's no mention, suggestion or inclination that a third party is involved.
 
Grave Danger said:
Perhaps we're playing some Chinese inspired long game to win the war against North Melbourne...
Click to expand...

I hope Atley just got some of polecs money
 
Spadge said:
If an employer offered you 2 extra years on your current contract offer and waved a 25% pay increase at you what would you do?

People need to get a grip
Click to expand...
If said employee was wasting away as a rookie on a rookie wage somewhere...
and was also of poor health with poor long term job prospects...

And then another employer showed faith in him and gave him a job with a much higher wage and onjob training that raised/realised his skill level and also helped heal his injuries so much so that he became one of the companies top employees..

Well I reckon that employer has a right to feel aggrieved if this staff member up and left him for another job

Its irrelevent to the employer what the employees new contract is... he can still feel aggrieved

PAFC is everything to many on here.... their religion even.... what makes them happy during the year

It's tribal...... ( try leaving a bike club and see how happy they are for you)

It's a love affair with the club.... ( mate you should be happy your wife left you for a younger richer man ... she now has a longer contract with more money .... be happy for her mate.... what's your problem )

So good on Polly for looking after Polly

But why do we have to like what Polec has done?

Stuff him I reckon

He's an ex
 
Last edited:
Pedro59 said:
If said employee was wasting away as a rookie on a rookie wage somewhere
And was also of poor Health with poor long term job prospects

And then another employer showed faith in him and gave him a job with a much higher wage and on job training that raised his skill level and also helped heal his injuries so much so that he became one of the companies top employees..

Well I reckon that employer has a right to feel aggrieved if this staff member up and left him for another job

Its irrelevent to the employer what the employees new contract is... he can still feel aggrieved

So good on Polly for looking after Polly

But why do we have to like what Polec has done?

Stuff him I reckon
Click to expand...
Over paying and long contracts to pry players out of other clubs is gonna happen more and more we've done it just like everyone else.

Club loyalties only stretch so far when these sort of offers are made Polly did the right thing for his situation and history, he had to maximise his career not just his bank account,
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Capital Power
  • Locked
Game Day The Dumont-Polec Shield, North v Ports R9
38 39 40 41 42
Replies
1K
Views
14K
dirty2
dirty2

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top