Recommitted Jay Schulz [re-signed]

[Kane McGoodwin]

Thanks man from the future ...

Can you please also tell me the lottery numbers?


Nobody knows how well it will work in the coming season. Maybe it does maybe it doesn't ...

Common sense says you won't play all those talls... & no xlotto numbers needed!

 

[philthy05]

Common sense says you won't play all those talls... & no xlotto numbers needed!

You mean two ruckman , two key forwards?

Because no team has ever done that before

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

You mean two ruckman , two key forwards?

Because no team has ever done that before

Not when they lack mobility.

Reckon you are stuck on the 90's at it would kill your midfield rotations.

 

[philthy05]

Not when they lack mobility.

Reckon you are stuck on the 90's at it would kill your midfield rotations.

which one of them lacks mobility?

lobbe? elite runner. probably the best runner of all the rucks in the afl. mobility? average to slightly above average for an afl ruck.

ryder? probably in the top 2 or 3 most mobile ruck men / kpp in the afl.

dixon? as a key forward. i don't really know about his mobility. ask gcs fans , but its certainly above most 200cm guys in the afl , and probably around average for a tall key forward.

schulz? extremely mobile key forward.

so which one did mean lacked mobility?

so tell me how we would be any worse then any other team that plays two rucks and two forwards?

im not sure whether we would be served better by having an extra runner over that extra ruck/tall. but we certainly are not in a position where we cannot play 2 rucks and 2 kfs. that is just bullshit made up by people who don't understand ports list.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

which one of them lacks mobility?

lobbe? elite runner. probably the best runner of all the rucks in the afl. mobility? average to slightly above average for an afl ruck.

ryder? probably in the top 2 or 3 most mobile ruck men / kpp in the afl.

dixon? as a key forward. i don't really know about his mobility. ask gcs fans , but its certainly above most 200cm guys in the afl , and probably around average for a tall key forward.

schulz? extremely mobile key forward.

so which one did mean lacked mobility?

so tell me how we would be any worse then any other team that plays two rucks and two forwards?

im not sure whether we would be served better by having an extra runner over that extra ruck/tall. but we certainly are not in a position where we cannot play 2 rucks and 2 kfs. that is just bullshit made up by people who don't understand ports list.

None of these 4 players are like Westoff & cam play as a midfielder or flanker type so Tonka hardly bullshit.

Will gladly have a chat about it during 2016 assuming all players are on your list.

 

[philthy05]

I'm seriously not sure what you are on about now? You said we couldn't play 2 rucks and 2 key forwards because they aren't mobile enough.

I disproved that...

Whether or not we will be better served by playing an extra runner or the second ruck I don't know yet. But you could ask the same of any team that's plays a second ruckman.

I'm arguing against people who state we cannot play 2 rucks and two kfs because they are too tall and now you are claiming not mobile enough. Is simply is not correct.