MRP / Trib. Jeremy Cameron sent to tribunal - Harris Andrews incident - read Mod announcement at post #67

[Colonial]

I was wrong but I had a crack nonetheless.

So taking shots at someone getting it wrong.

But you "had a crack" lol fmd.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

 

[Smartest Brain]

a few seconds ago
Jeremy Cameron has been suspended for FIVE weeks.

 

[Giant Strides]

C'est la vie. Now let's get back to the footy. And best wishes to Harris Andrews for a quick recovery. Preferable not to miss any matches, but for safety's sake likely to be at least a couple; hopefully as few as possible and no long term ill effects.

 

[dlanod]

5 weeks. Was thinking it would be 4.

Could be worse. Especially with the Intentional sentence.



Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

The moment it was guilty of intentional I expected it to be six. A bit surprised with five. I wonder if it was an indicator of "look, it could be worse if there's an appeal".

 

[Determinant]

a few seconds ago
Jeremy Cameron has been suspended for FIVE weeks.

tbh I think it's fair.

 

[Isaac Cumming No 1]

Hoped for a bit less and not sold it was intentional. It is what it is though and I've got no major bitch. As Captain Phil said, what happened just cant happen and he'll have to serve weeks.

 

[BrisDog]

So taking shots at someone getting it wrong.

But you "had a crack" lol fmd.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

Looked like a 5-6 weeker. I thought with the hype he would get 6. No way was he getting 2-3. 5 weeks is not a bad result for GWS considering the damage done to Andrews.

 

[Smartest Brain]

The moment it was guilty of intentional I expected it to be six. A bit surprised with five. I wonder if it was an indicator of "look, it could be worse if there's an appeal".

It is just, 4 + 6 divided by 2 equals 5.

 

[Drummond]

I see what you guys mean.

The main board are out of control!! My goodness.

 

[Isaac Cumming No 1]

The moment it was guilty of intentional I expected it to be six. A bit surprised with five. I wonder if it was an indicator of "look, it could be worse if there's an appeal".

Think you might be reading a bit much into it. More likely there was disagreement and it was a compromise.

 

[dlanod]

not sold it was intentional

I think the tribunal's system isn't that the high contact is necessarily intentional, but that the contact was intentional - which Jeremy had already admitted in his post-match interview.

 

[Smartest Brain]

tbh I think it's fair.

Why? Because the media and bigfooty were pushing for 10 the whole week? It is a common tactic to get a compromise, like Trump in the Art of the Deal. I hope the club appeals this.

 

[dlanod]

Think you might be reading a bit much into it. More likely there was disagreement and it was a compromise.

Purely speculation. It's just a bit odd to rule someone guilty and then split the difference on the suggested penalties. Usually they take the AFL's recommendation once found huilty.

 

[Bogan Juniors]

I think intentional is a wrong call, but even given reckless/careless Five seems about right given the injury caused.

 

[Smartest Brain]

I think the tribunal's system isn't that the high contact is necessarily intentional, but that the contact was intentional - which Jeremy had already admitted in his post-match interview.

How many collisions in the AFL are premeditated and intentional? Nearly all of them. Doesn't mean Cameron wanted to connect on Andrews jaw.

 

[Isaac Cumming No 1]

I think the tribunal's system isn't that the high contact is necessarily intentional, but that the contact was intentional - which Jeremy had already admitted in his post-match interview.

I dont get intentional contact is illegal anyway. But what happened was.

 

[Isaac Cumming No 1]

I see what you guys mean.

The main board are out of control!! My goodness.

Have to got to the bit where he should be put in stocks then flogged around the fleet yet?

oh wait that was me.

 

[gordo2016]

You are aware Cameron was given a free kick for a push in the back which was over ridden after the high contact right?

Have some context before you speak

You are aware that Harris Andrews has been in hospital with bleeding from the brain from an intentional elbow in the head?
Have some context before you speak.

 

[Smartest Brain]

You are aware that Harris Andrews has been in hospital with bleeding from the brain from an elbow in the head that wasn't necessary?
Have some context before you speak.

You do know there are kids starving while you eat your dinner every night, have some context before you survive.

 

[Isaac Cumming No 1]

You are aware that Harris Andrews has been in hospital with bleeding from the brain from an intentional elbow in the head?
Have some context before you speak.

You're a known troll with history on this board. Why haven't you answered my question if you came for sensible discussion?

 

[Colonial]

You are aware that Harris Andrews has been in hospital with bleeding from the brain from an intentional elbow in the head?
Have some context before you speak.

I didnt see you wondering how Ward was demanding a penalty after he was knocked out.

Maybe you should to.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

 

[Giant Strides]

You're a known troll with history on this board. Why haven't you answered my question if you came for sensible discussion?

Don't feed the trolls!

 

[Colonial]

The moment it was guilty of intentional I expected it to be six. A bit surprised with five. I wonder if it was an indicator of "look, it could be worse if there's an appeal".

To be honest I have no idea how how this works other than the whims of the vfl media.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

 

[Isaac Cumming No 1]

Don't feed the trolls!

We have history, but your right. I will stop.

 

[gordo2016]

You're a known troll with history on this board. Why haven't you answered my question if you came for sensible discussion?

I only answer intelligent questions.