- Sep 16, 2006
- 35,877
- 35,481
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Ah if only Collingwood could do a 'Mayne' and get McGovern and Mackenzie mixed up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With each passing moment, the pressure builds on the Eagles. The stress already starting to show on their supporter's faces.
That’s a really soft - nothing win if he leaves.If he stays, great we don't want to lose him.
If he does want to leave, match the offer and make the other club pay through the nose to get him.
Either way it's a win-win situation.
That’s a really soft - nothing win if he leaves.
You trolling this thread as a compulsive s**t take machine is totally cool.That’s a really soft - nothing win if he leaves.
Agree but a club paying him 1.2 million is not a win for the Eagles. Getting good compensation would be the win if he left.Players come and go, it's the nature of sport.
AFL had been sheltered from this for a large part but as free agency gets more traction it's only going to get worse.
Agree but a club paying him 1.2 million is not a win for the Eagles. Getting good compensation would be the win if he left.
A fit Naitanui is the most important. I'd consider Shuey more important than McGovern by virtue of the position he plays.I would have thought from this year he is the most important player at the Eagles and the key player in their defence and is 25? JK (who was the MIP) is the wrong side of 30 now starting to deal with old man injuries, Nic nat (previously the MIP) sadly will not be the player he once was after such a serious knee injury, Shuey is good but he's no Nat Fyfe or Dangerfield. Who am I missing? I'd pay to keep him at the $$ suggested. Obviously other clubs can afford to with their top player.
Doubt we'd be too interested given our needs.That would be an odd move. They have Hooker (30), Hurley (28), Hartley (25). Spending $1m+ on a 26 year old key defender doesn't fill a pressing area of need.
Hawthorn makes sense, so does Carlton, Collingwood, perhaps Geelong with Mackie/Lonergan finishing up and Taylor 32 but they'd be pressed for money early on.
Doubt we'd be too interested given our needs.
It might come down to $1m a year to stay and $1.2m to move.
You're a sensible poster Scotland, surely you don't believe there is an up to 500 thousand dollar gap, per year, between staying and going?More likely $7-800k to stay and $1.2m to move.
You're a sensible poster Scotland, surely you don't believe there is an up to 500 thousand dollar gap, per year, between staying and going?
There was talk of needing $1m each for McGovern and Yeo back before Yeo signed up.Up until rumours of a $1.2m offer from a mysterious Victorian club appeared, no one was talking of $1m contracts for McGovern. Just because one team is allegedly willing to pay that for a free agent doesn't mean that every team would be. Tom Boyd got $6m over 6 years or something. No way GWS could have or would have offered near that.
McGovern is a fine player, but IMO he's not worth $1m+. Nor is golden boy Rance, Hurley, Talia or any other key defender. Jake Lever allegedly signed for ($800k IIRC) a contract that would've made him Adelaide's highest paid player and he was already looking at a move back to Victoria. If you want to lure an established, quality player away from their existing club then you need to dangle a serious carrot.
There was talk of needing $1m each for McGovern and Yeo back before Yeo signed up.
Articles and everything