- Jul 12, 2013
- 7,559
- 11,289
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Sturt, 49ers, Braves
Source?She promotes domestic violence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Source?She promotes domestic violence.
Bradman's career runs aggregates weren't outstanding.
Yes, it's based off exciting and untouchable averages.
We were talking about aggregates mate
I don't understand. How exactly does she promote domestic violence? I don't even know why I bother asking... You're obviously a) craving for online attention and validation. You must be pretty sad and lonely in your offline life, b) someone who gets a thrill out of saying obscene things and getting a reaction. The substance doesn't matter, it is all about the reaction and c) a bit dimShe promotes domestic violence.
Actually lethal is the Jacques Kallis of the AFL. Achieved significant milestones through career longevity and an all time great though certainly not the greatest.Matthews was the Adam Gilchrist of the AFL
Good at two things which made him useful, but not dominant at anything
Actually lethal is the Jacques Kallis of the AFL. Achieved significant milestones through career longevity and an all time great though certainly not the greatest.
Fake statistic. Plenty of people have averaged more goals a game. Plenty of people have averaged more possessions a game.Jacques Kallis' averages don't stand out, whereas Lethal remains in a league of his own in terms of overall statistics. Nobody has been able to average 2.76 goals a game, as he did, from the midfield
Yes we were talking about how irrelevant they are to Bradman's legacy. It's similar with Matthews, it's the averages that are head and shoulders above the rest.
Actually lethal is the Jacques Kallis of the AFL. Achieved significant milestones through career longevity and an all time great though certainly not the greatest.
Plenty of people have averaged more goals a game. Plenty of people have averaged more possessions a game.
It's completely different to Bradman because Matthews does not register as one of the best forwards or midfielders of all time. He was good at both, but you can't play both at once, so that has little value
Its precisely because you can't play both at once that his stats are so incredible. He was essentially worth two players, because for all intents and purposes, he did do both at the same time.
He would have been a good Supercoach player aye
Nobody has done averaged as much at the same time, which is the real trick in a game of AFL. It's not like cricket where you do one stat at a time.
It's worth considering what a contested possession midfielder averaging 2.8 goals a game would average.
The last 20 & 3 from Nathan Brown in 2005 scored an average of 121 points per game. Only Dangerfield exceeded that last year
Fake stats.
No-one gives a s**t about or even mentions 20 and 3’s or 2.86 and whatever’s outside of you on the Bay.
Lethal Jacques was a great player but he’s no Bradman. When they talk about all time great forwards or all time great midfielders he’s not in the conversation.
Nathan was an outside player, you don't get many points from that.
Gotta think 150 over the career.
Should've, but there's only 1 player of the century, gotta be content with that.