- Aug 22, 2009
- 24,555
- 29,452
- AFL Club
- West Coast
His ban from the match simulation means it's case closed (no IN).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Hird got nailed when asked about the "individual" choice of the remaining 2012 players, whether they'd be allowed to exercise their choice. Indeed Hirdy, you will have a one on one discussion with those players won't you.http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-03-06/six-dons-to-sit-it-out
Made a miraculous recovery from his general soreness did he? Now why would he play in a non practice match instead of the nab when he has no IN?
Doesn't mention that they didn't receive infraction noticesJoe was named along with with the other 5 players that don't have infraction notices.
No it doesn't.His ban from the match simulation means it's case closed (no IN).
Wait for the verdict bloke.Oh please.
Your club undertook a doping program with little regard for the welfare of their players, continually changing their story/lying and treating everyone else with utter contempt. And you wonder why people dislike them and want to see them burn?![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
No it doesn't.
Yes you have got it in one. We Carlton supporters are just jealous of EFC's unparalleled success over the last 10 years, especially all those finals wins. Or maybe we just don't like cheats and liars.and certain Carlton supporters are so desperate to see another club relegated to a decade and a half of mediocrity that they have become ludicrously emotionally invested in this whole affair
NoTechnically I suppose you are correct. But why would they ban him if he has an IN?
Personally, I thought him not being named raised suspicion. However after being banned from the simulation I think it's pretty clear (IMO) that he doesn't have an IN.
No
He wasn't apart of the squad in 2012, so why is everybody shocked?
He was training in 2012, didn't play in 2012 for Essendon. Be interesting to see if he plays the NAB cup
no of course you're not. You have to perform some olympic style mental gymnastics to get around the fundamental logic you have just outlinedSorry I'm confused.
The AFL has ruled that all non-2012 players can't play against Williamstown as they can play against the saints. This includes Daniher. If Daniher had an IN, he couldn't play against the saints, and thus would be allowed to play against Williamstown.
Am I missing something?
He was a non 2012 player, so he can't play against Williamstown even if he received a IN. Just because he didn't play for them, doesn't mean he didn't receive a INSorry I'm confused.
The AFL has ruled that all non-2012 players can't play against Williamstown as they can play against the saints. This includes Daniher. If Daniher had an IN, he couldn't play against the saints, and thus would be allowed to play against Williamstown.
Am I missing something?
Sorry I'm confused.
The AFL has ruled that all non-2012 players can't play against Williamstown as they can play against the saints. This includes Daniher. If Daniher had an IN, he couldn't play against the saints, and thus would be allowed to play against Williamstown.
Am I missing something?
His ban from the match simulation means it's case closed (no IN).
hahaha please don't bring your logic in to thisWhy would they inject Daniher and not first year guys like Merrett, Kavanagh, Dalgleish, Obrien ect?
Do non-Essendon supports not realize that we do not care what you think of us?
Why keep going on about people hating us after this? We gonna have a bad name after this? Are you trying to scare us?
I hate you and your club already, I didn't need a drug saga.
You have all probably researched more crap about drugs in sport because of this (to try and get a one up against Essendon supporters) than ever studied anything in your school years, and that's because of your hatred.
Your hatred, can't you see how far your hatred has pushed you over these years to this board? It is so deep, you have dug yourselves so deep into hatred that I can't fathom what would happen if Essendon is found not guilty.
You all say kool aid this, kool aid that but if someone was reading a story/novel about this years later and they had to describe the Essendon supporters I think they would say "they were supportive and defensive of their club".
Stop trying to convince me you and footy world will label us "whatever" for years to come unless we do what you tell us to, I aint drinking that kool-aid.
Do non-Essendon supports not realize that we do not care what you think of us?
Why keep going on about people hating us after this? We gonna have a bad name after this? Are you trying to scare us?
I hate you and your club already, I didn't need a drug saga.
You have all probably researched more crap about drugs in sport because of this (to try and get a one up against Essendon supporters) than ever studied anything in your school years, and that's because of your hatred.
Your hatred, can't you see how far your hatred has pushed you over these years to this board? It is so deep, you have dug yourselves so deep into hatred that I can't fathom what would happen if Essendon is found not guilty.
You all say kool aid this, kool aid that but if someone was reading a story/novel about this years later and they had to describe the Essendon supporters I think they would say "they were supportive and defensive of their club".
Stop trying to convince me you and footy world will label us "whatever" for years to come unless we do what you tell us to, I aint drinking that kool-aid.
hahaha please don't bring your logic in to this
You keep on replying/justifying/defending your club on this, yet another lie from the Essendon camp.Do non-Essendon supports not realize that we do not care what you think of us?
Because Daniher is considerably more talented than them? Also, were these players training with the club before they were drafted, like Daniher was?Why would they inject Daniher and not first year guys like Merrett, Kavanagh, Dalgleish, Obrien ect?