HirdsTheWord
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
- Jun 19, 2014
- 13,193
- 15,198
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- New York Rangers, New York Knicks
not when the questions are black and white
not sure they are all black and white lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
not when the questions are black and white
John Barilaro using the word "trauma" to describe what he has experienced is a disgrace.
I think you meant 'Consequences', Bruz.
John Barilaro using the word "trauma" to describe what he has experienced is a disgrace.
I think you meant 'Consequences', Bruz.
he said he will reveal his 3rd Referee after lunch
The context is that he refused to reveal that third reference, stated it was not relevant and insisted that he did not have to.
It was only AFTER this exchange that he reluctantly agreed:
Labor’s Daniel Mookhey says it is a lawful and relevant question.
“You’re the person who got the job, your referee was highly influential... The final report that was signed makes it very clear that your referees were a very important consideration [in getting the job],”
There's your context for you. And why journalist Sam Maiden highlighted it in her tweet.
come on mate - give it context.
he said he will reveal his 3rd Referee after lunch once he has time to contact them to confirm its ok. This was agreed by all as fair and reasonable.
If your gonna bash the bloke at least be fair about it rofl.
one of the questions was 'when did you ask him to be your reference?'. 'I don't recall' is a crock. You'll have phone or email records. He could've easily said 'let me check my records and get back to you' but chose to lie through his teeth.not sure they are all black and white lol
He will reveal his 3rd referee after he has had a chance to call them and get their story straight.
The first two referees were a senior public service official that Bruz appointed and is also caught up in the Maguire/Berejiklian enquiry, and a former LNP senator who was known for having his snout in the trough and has been a recipient of jobs for the boys.
Rotten to the core.
Untrue - he made no such agreement.Actually no, the chair said he did not have to reveal it but that the committee had the right to summons him later to reveal it.
He than agreed after consulting the referee during lunch.
Untrue - he made no such agreement.
He only agreed he will consult and will come back after lunch with his decision after the committee chair warned him he might be compelled to answer the question at a later date.
Or has senior NewsCorp political reporter Sam Maiden and state reporter Anton Nilsson got that 'context' wrong as well?
FFS.that is exactly what i said?
so i think we agree?
You didn't include this bit in your original post? (you edited it in AFTER i quoted you) (that's all i said) Also the chair is a women, so my bad on that BTW. I think I said "he"
come on mate - give it context.
FFS.
Yes I edited it - not by removing anything but by adding to it. Specifically to directly cut and paste the full reporting from the the source and the comments they used. For accuracy and context and to refute your narrative.
Given you attacked me for not understanding the 'context' with this comment:
You wanted context - you got context. Word for word in sequence from the journalists present. With direct comments from the source and a link to support it.
not sure wtf your issue with that is.
And.."I'm the victim, not the perpetrator"
Are we completely overlooking the fact someone else had already been appointed for the job before Bruz "applied" now?And..
"I went through as Joe Citizen .. this was not a job for the boys it was not a captain's pick. I went through an independent process and I got the job"
“What did I do wrong? I got offered a job. I accepted a job”
Totally deluded.
No, he is.Are we completely overlooking the fact someone else had already been appointed for the job before Bruz "applied" now?
Dude, the original context was correct. You're the one innacuratley framing events and have been caught out for it. Either admit you got it wrong or simply stop replying about it. This is just pathetic.FFS.
Yes I edited it - not by removing anything but by adding to it. Specifically to directly cut and paste the full reporting from the the source and the comments they used. For accuracy and context and to refute your narrative.
Given you attacked me for not understanding the 'context' with this comment:
You wanted context - you got context. Word for word in sequence from the journalists present. With direct comments from the source and a link to support it.
not sure wtf your issue with that is.