ferrisb
Brownlow Medallist
I thought Plowman would finish higher
Too much love for Plowman...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought Plowman would finish higher
Too much love for Plowman...
To be fair... some where in between too much love, and not enough love, is just the right amount of love
Did Larkey's game cost Weiters AA and B&F?
Did Larkey's game cost Weiters AA and B&F?
And no longer have jobsExcept the people that know a lot more than you and me and all of us didnt agree with you. And they give the votes.
Yeah the midfield got flogged, but he got torn a new one. It was in the midst of a couple of down weeks for weitering.And I blame that Larkey game on our midfield.
Weiters was a lamb to the slaughter. Larkey isn't even that great relative to the other strong forwards in the comp.
Weiters was minding 3 tall forwards that day. We had no-one else. Kemp playing his first game was our next tall.Yeah the midfield got flogged, but he got torn a new one. It was in the midst of a couple of down weeks for weitering.
Sent from my CPH2005 using Tapatalk
I thought Plowman would finish higher
Is there a list with all votes on it.just interested to see how some others polled.thanks
More than a pat on the back but don't boof himTo be fair... some where in between too much love, and not enough love, is just the right amount of love
found it King Rupert ........Something I knocked together, a little hurriedly I must say, so please forgive any errors!
Hope the formatting is OK here...
01 183 Walsh
02 172 Weitering
03 118 McKay
04 112 Cripps
05 100 Curnow, E
06 97 Saad
07 86 Plowman
08 80 Jones
09 75 Betts
10 71 Silvagni
11 69 Fogarty
12 65 Docherty
13 63 Newman
14 59 Williams
15 56 Newnes
16 53 Kennedy
17 50 Martin
18 44 Pittonet
19 42 Owies
20 35 Stocker
21 34 Cottrell
22 34 Dow
23 28 Fisher
24 27 De Koning
25 27 Petrevski-Seton
26 26 Gibbons
27 23 Casboult
28 20 Murphy
29 17 Cuningham
30 15 Williamson
31 14 McGovern
32 13 Honey
33 13 O'Brien
34 10 Curnow, C
35 8 Setterfield
36 5 Parks
37 4 McDonald
38 2 Kemp
39 1 Durdin
Surprising Stocker is so low.Something I knocked together, a little hurriedly I must say, so please forgive any errors!
Hope the formatting is OK here...
01 183 Walsh
02 172 Weitering
03 118 McKay
04 112 Cripps
05 100 Curnow, E
06 97 Saad
07 86 Plowman
08 80 Jones
09 75 Betts
10 71 Silvagni
11 69 Fogarty
12 65 Docherty
13 63 Newman
14 59 Williams
15 56 Newnes
16 53 Kennedy
17 50 Martin
18 44 Pittonet
19 42 Owies
20 35 Stocker
21 34 Cottrell
22 34 Dow
23 28 Fisher
24 27 De Koning
25 27 Petrevski-Seton
26 26 Gibbons
27 23 Casboult
28 20 Murphy
29 17 Cuningham
30 15 Williamson
31 14 McGovern
32 13 Honey
33 13 O'Brien
34 10 Curnow, C
35 8 Setterfield
36 5 Parks
37 4 McDonald
38 2 Kemp
39 1 Durdin
Thanks for thatSomething I knocked together, a little hurriedly I must say, so please forgive any errors!
Hope the formatting is OK here...
01 183 Walsh
02 172 Weitering
03 118 McKay
04 112 Cripps
05 100 Curnow, E
06 97 Saad
07 86 Plowman
08 80 Jones
09 75 Betts
10 71 Silvagni
11 69 Fogarty
12 65 Docherty
13 63 Newman
14 59 Williams
15 56 Newnes
16 53 Kennedy
17 50 Martin
18 44 Pittonet
19 42 Owies
20 35 Stocker
21 34 Cottrell
22 34 Dow
23 28 Fisher
24 27 De Koning
25 27 Petrevski-Seton
26 26 Gibbons
27 23 Casboult
28 20 Murphy
29 17 Cuningham
30 15 Williamson
31 14 McGovern
32 13 Honey
33 13 O'Brien
34 10 Curnow, C
35 8 Setterfield
36 5 Parks
37 4 McDonald
38 2 Kemp
39 1 Durdin
Spot on, some of the criticism of him is very unwarranted. He's a gun imo, also very happy for A Saad, some of his critics should watch his game and not listen to outside bs.No it shows Ed is much better than some care to believe.