- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,781
- 56,724
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #26
Of interest:
Marilyn Manson - Depp's bestie.
Marilyn Manson - Depp's bestie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IMO, it's only a matter of time, before Depp goes down.His fans might be forced to reconsider their position.
Wow Kurve. You clearly haven't listened to the Depp v Heard case and the facts.
Let's speak again when you've looked at Depp's complete history and the documentary 'Framing Amber Heard' comes out.
I've listened to ALL the evidence K. ALL. Probably 300 hours if it. I DIDN'T get anything wrong she does interviews still defending herself in the USA. The animosity in the interviewer is tangible. You listen and then come back to me.
What makes you think I haven't? Because I can see something that you and almost everybody else can't?
She's got issues, she's disordered and it's apparent in her language. The UK judge was smart enough to recognise her problems and cut through it but Depp counted on his ability to play the court and work a jury to his advantage.
The High Court Judge in the UK explained his decision in a near 200 page document that was so thorough two judges reviewed it and couldn't find any room for appeal. There were no mistakes. I've read that too and he found 12 of 14 wife beating allegations against Depp to be substantially true.
If you have listened to what I've listened to you would have zero doubt. So that's what tells me you haven't. It's indisputable.
Yes the UK argument is what's used against it. The UK was against the paper and AH was a witness so her testimony wasn't challenged in the way it was in USA.
The UK result was in error plain and simple
If you have seen and listened to what I have, you wouldn't be so confident. I haven't suggested Amber towards the latter part of their relationship wasn't just awful and that she never contributed because she was and she did. He created her, as a reaction.
The US trial allowed for Depp's lawyers to focus on attacking Heard and where he could DARVO her. Like he is with these latest charges. Her lawyers were also outgunned, they were terrible actually. They must have told her to address the jury with her answers and it put her out of sync jerking her head around and the jurors were weirded out by it.
They're pretty smart over there in the High Court. I'll wait and see if Heard appeals and she should because the jury handed down contradictory findings.
Fun fact, did you know Amber Heard was only two years old when Depp faced his first assault and battery charges?
If you have seen and listened to what I have, you wouldn't be so confident. I haven't suggested Amber towards the latter part of their relationship wasn't just awful and that she never contributed because she was and she did. He created her, as a reaction.
The US trial allowed for Depp's lawyers to focus on attacking Heard and where he could DARVO her. Like he is with these latest charges. Her lawyers were also outgunned, they were terrible actually. They must have told her to address the jury with her answers and it put her out of sync jerking her head around and the jurors were weirded out by it.
They're pretty smart over there in the High Court. I'll wait and see if Heard appeals and she should because the jury handed down contradictory findings.
Fun fact, did you know Amber Heard was only two years old when Depp faced his first assault and battery charges?
She is appealing. The guy i was following who is excellent called 'the lawyer you know" has suggested that the appeal will fail. Less than a 1% chance and he gives legal reasons for that.
The verdicts weren't actually contradictory. She lost. He lost in one limb which was whether they spilt some wine and roughed up the place to make it look like he had trashed it. The problem was both police officers said there wasn't anything roughed up and wine spilt so JDs solicitors remark on that face value WAS in error. The problem though is that she lost nothing from it so the damages if $2m was erroneous. It's said JD will likely win on his appeal
I don't know JDs history. I'm no fan either
when I started looking it was after UK and my attitude was he was an abuser. I now accept that was very wrong. If he has an assault history he has. Likely linked to drugs and alcohol I would imagine.
The body language panel who I also follow are unanimous about her pathological lies. They draw attention to the fact that when you shift from emotion you can't do it instantaneously because the emotion must morph. Hers changed emotion and expressions in seconds. They concluded it was all fake and further that she's a narcissist.
They trashed the unit in Aust. Pretty clear the major influence for doing so is his drug and alcohol issues. That appears to be a prevalent problem for him. There was an argument. After she cut off his finger he used it. .the bloodied finger to write messages to her about her infidelity on a mirror. When the blood wasn't enough he would dab the tip in paint and use that mixture to continue the messages. Strange drug fuelled behaviour with property damage but no physical abuse from him. She would use lipstick to write messages back to him on same mirror holed up in different parts of the unit. A message about carly Simon her song 'your so vain' as a means to put him down. in the case rather than owning her own behaviors and what she wrote she would instead claim that he used BOTH the blood/ paint mixture and the lipstick to make ALL the messages alone effectively she would claim having an argument with himself on the mirror. Pathological liar. Simply can't help herself. The pattern of behaviour was that an argument would ensue and he would seek to escape to prevent physical altercation. She would pursue him through multiple rooms he would lock and she'd bang down the door. 5 bathrooms and several bedrooms. Her view is that when you have an argument you stay together and slug it out and instead because he would run and hide she would pursue him and harass him that he ran away. Sick. Very sick. He avoided escalation. She would demand he stay so she could hit him and then say because it didn't really hurt him that it wasn't punching. His need to escape her was so pronounced that ultimately whenever they went anywhere they would book two rooms side by side so that in the event she pursued him he could escape to the second unit and hide until things cooled. She hated de-escalation like that because she needed him to stand and slug it out and he refused. These are not the behaviours of an abusive man. They are the behaviours of a man out of his depth wanting to de-escalate.
In court she said that he dragged her on her back through broken glass. There was only one person who got medical treatment of any kind that night JD for the lost finger. she had no marks cuts or anything even though she claimed he dragged her through broken glass. Liar
Brooks filed a civil complaint against Depp, in which he alleges Depp hit him twice in the ribs and then yelled, "I'll give you $100,000 to punch me right now!" while on the set of the film. Brooks refused.
Before he could enlist the officer’s help, however, Brooks’ suit said that Depp accosted Plaintiff and began attacking him, angrily screaming in his face ‘WHO THE F— ARE YOU? YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO TELL ME WHAT TO DO!'”
Brooks informed Depp about filming limitations for the Barclay Hotel set of the movie. He alleges Depp then became irate and abused him both verbally and physically.
Depp claims that the film crew member who has accused the star of punching him on the set of “City of Lies” sustained his injuries due to “self defence/defence of others.”
Brooks himself “provoked” the actions that resulted in his own injuries.
Depp claims that the acts complained of by Plaintiff were provoked by Plaintiff’s unlawful and wrongful conduct in that Plaintiff willfully and maliciously acted out and conducted his activities in such a manner as to cause, Defendant Depp to fear for his safety
You say she hasn't cut his finger off but she admits to having done just that on a tape. No framing....HER words admitting guilt