I'm not as smart as him. I freely admit that. My opinion is just that. OpinionIf you're not as smart as him (i.e. sub-optimal non-elite IQ), why should your opinion be credible?
You are not as smart as him. (Fill in the blanks)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not as smart as him. I freely admit that. My opinion is just that. OpinionIf you're not as smart as him (i.e. sub-optimal non-elite IQ), why should your opinion be credible?
Point me in the right direction of 'low resolution problem solving.'The professor also warned about people claiming to have all the answers, and about low-resolution problem solving which you are engaging in right now by deifying him.
You can agree with someone; just don't deify them.I'm not as smart as him. I freely admit that. My opinion is just that. Opinion
You are not as smart as him. (Fill in the blanks)
I can do whatever I want.You can agree with someone; just don't deify them.
Keep that attitude up and you won't get dessert.I can do whatever I want.
I see.Keep that attitude up and you won't get dessert.
You assume I am not as smart as him, you mean.I'm not as smart as him. I freely admit that. My opinion is just that. Opinion
You are not as smart as him. (Fill in the blanks)
So your notion of reasonable is to attack the author! A very accomplished one who academic and highly regarded lawyer Josh Bornstein regards as “one of the best writers”, and doing so without showing one iota of rigour. Different definition of reasonable to mine but one that would no doubt appeal to the Peterson flock.
Even socialists would agree in the notion of a hierarchy of competence. But these rusted on Peterson fans would argue these hierarchies are permanent, unchanging. Im sure you can see the root of an undemocratic politics embedded in this.
I made it quite clear I was talking about a minority of Peterson fans.You are arguing a straw man view using 'Peterson fans'. Peterson speaks for equal opportunity, not hierarchies that are permanent, and most definitely not something at the root of an undemocratic politics.
Do you even want to be as smart as JP? With intellect comes much responsibility.You assume I am not as smart as him, you mean.
Do you even want to be as smart as JP? With intellect comes much responsibility.
You struggle to keep social misfits like kid viscous in line.
How would you go in interviews, and facing mass hostility?
Oh shuddup.LOL.....Good one.
Your tongue has been stuck in you cheek for the last 3 pages.
See, all this puts me in a tricky situation. I could point out that you don't me at all, and produce some information about myself that makes you look very foolish, but would likely be seen as a bit hubristic and maybe even arrogant.Do you even want to be as smart as JP? With intellect comes much responsibility.
You struggle to keep social misfits like kid viscous in line.
How would you go in interviews, and facing mass hostility?
I made it quite clear I was talking about a minority of Peterson fans.
Just like I made it clear I was asking whether he had an undemocratic politics, not stating it an opinion. I asked Dog because he's read more of him than I have.
Yes, there is unquestionably a stench of undemocratic politics among the minority of Peterson fans my question was alluding to.You said 'Im sure you can see the root of an undemocratic politics embedded in this'. That's not a question based on an ignorance of Peterson's views. It's a statement based on your view that 'these rusted on Peterson fans would argue these hierarchies are permanent, unchanging'.
Maps of Meaning showed has no holes.
You actually need to read some of his stuff before you criticise. If you haven't read any of his material, then why do you care what he has to say?
He shows up in every other podcast. Can’t avoid him at the moment. This will pass, like Milo has.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Yes, there is unquestionably a stench of undemocratic politics among the minority of Peterson fans my question was alluding to.
I was asking if that ran through Peterson's actual views.
Like I said you are using this purported view of the minority of Peterson fans as a straw man. The stench is yours.
Justify whatever you feel you need to by reference to Peterson's quoted views or acknowledge your ignorance and withdraw
Pretty insulting comparison.He shows up in every other podcast. Can’t avoid him at the moment. This will pass, like Milo has.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Pretty insulting comparison.