CheapCharlie
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 12, 2015
- 6,416
- 7,985
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Schick sales are upHow's that Gillette boycott going?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Schick sales are upHow's that Gillette boycott going?
Retirees need their FCs and it's unethical to remove them is about social justice.
Giving people their money back via income taxes is social justice.
Protecting the community via strong borders is social justice.
It's a different branch of social justice, but using 'sjw' as a win now button is lazy.
If social justice means advocating policies that are an ethical distribution of wealth, then yeah, conservatives have their own conception of social justice.Not really social justice at all. I see how you’re trying to spin it but I doubt you even believe what you wrote.
Labor we’re fools thinking the over the top twitter mob represented the true voice of the people.
If social justice means advocating policies that are an ethical distribution of wealth, then yeah, conservatives have their own conception of social justice.
Try constructing your own arguments instead of the relentless "I know you are but am I"??If social justice means advocating policies that are an ethical distribution of wealth, then yeah, conservatives have their own conception of social justice.
No.Try constructing your own arguments instead of the relentless "I know you are but am I"??
Or comparing apples with oranges in a desperate attempt at identifying hypocrisy!
If social justice means advocating policies that are an ethical distribution of wealth, conservatives have their own conception of social justice.
Wasted as a baristaKidd Vicious really does push the envelope with language.
Frankly I Give a dang...love u lotsAhem, Franking Credits.
If they go down that track they will get punished as well.The Libs have their own conception of social justice. Don't pretend otherwise.
Totally agree.Many intelligent left leaning voters like yourself came to the same realisation you did.
It's one thing to live in an internet fantasy land of gay wedding cakes, throwing of eggs at the patriarchy, and social justice for the downtrodden.
It's quite another to play real life SJW Russian Roulette with the people of Australia.
Commonsense prevailed.
Well, she was trying to argue nutrition with Layne Norton the other day as if she's more qualified because of her anecdotal all-meat experience. I guess she's followed in her father's footsteps by claiming authority in topics she's weak in.God his daughter is annoying now that she's involved in the Podcasts
He's not a conservative?
Totally agree.
People don’t want the silliness of gender pronouns and genetically Xy people who feel like they are women entering into little girls toilets.
The Labor will lose the next election as well.
They have blamed Palmers ads, the Queenslander bigots, people being selfish, leader’s inability to connect etc. Only heard a little about the cultural war against working people.
They still have the hard left destroying the party. At the same time, the hard right have been weaken in the Libs.
This article has been getting a bit of a run on Twitter, although it is from last year. It might have already been posted here?
Anyway, this is for contra:
Jordan Peterson’s Jungian best-seller is banal, superficial, and insidious
The real danger in 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos is its apologia for social Darwinism and bourgeois individualism covered over with awww.catholicworldreport.com
“... the real problems in Peterson are far more dangerous than his prolixity, superficiality, or banality. The real danger in this book is its apologia for social Darwinism and bourgeois individualism covered over with a theological patina.“
That’s code for calling somebody a racist.This article has been getting a bit of a run on Twitter, although it is from last year. It might have already been posted here?
Anyway, this is for contra:
Jordan Peterson’s Jungian best-seller is banal, superficial, and insidious
The real danger in 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos is its apologia for social Darwinism and bourgeois individualism covered over with awww.catholicworldreport.com
“... the real problems in Peterson are far more dangerous than his prolixity, superficiality, or banality. The real danger in this book is its apologia for social Darwinism and bourgeois individualism covered over with a theological patina.“
This article has been getting a bit of a run on Twitter, although it is from last year. It might have already been posted here?
Anyway, this is for contra:
Jordan Peterson’s Jungian best-seller is banal, superficial, and insidious
The real danger in 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos is its apologia for social Darwinism and bourgeois individualism covered over with awww.catholicworldreport.com
“... the real problems in Peterson are far more dangerous than his prolixity, superficiality, or banality. The real danger in this book is its apologia for social Darwinism and bourgeois individualism covered over with a theological patina.“
Many intelligent left leaning voters like yourself came to the same realisation you did.
It's one thing to live in an internet fantasy land of gay wedding cakes, throwing of eggs at the patriarchy, and social justice for the downtrodden.
It's quite another to play real life SJW Russian Roulette with the people of Australia.
Commonsense prevailed.
He's a very smart human being , is what he is.
Neither conservative nor left. simply himself !
Not many if any like him. Hits the spot that most others miss.
It's funny that under funding things that produce future economic growth is called good economic management.Don't really see how Labor were doing it thou. Just became the accepted narrative like libs are better at managing the economy and labor did f all to shut it down.
Shared by Richard Cooke, who seems to have an obsession with Peterson. Maybe he’s jealous because his ludicrous book isn’t selling as well.This article has been getting a bit of a run on Twitter, although it is from last year. It might have already been posted here?
Anyway, this is for contra:
Jordan Peterson’s Jungian best-seller is banal, superficial, and insidious
The real danger in 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos is its apologia for social Darwinism and bourgeois individualism covered over with awww.catholicworldreport.com
“... the real problems in Peterson are far more dangerous than his prolixity, superficiality, or banality. The real danger in this book is its apologia for social Darwinism and bourgeois individualism covered over with a theological patina.“