Yeah looks like it.The Beams Trade be Holding this one up I reckon
Fair to say Beams is a slightly higher priority hey!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah looks like it.The Beams Trade be Holding this one up I reckon
Yeah looks like it.
Fair to say Beams is a slightly higher priority hey!
Did Coll lose anyone under FA?
Seems strange they wouldn't have recruited him then - unless they though they might be getting May
I’m sure it will still happen but think we are waiting to see what late picks you have left. Think it will be Roughead and 63 for one of your picks.Depends IF Trade can be done.
Tiny Chance because of Beams Trade we might be too late to do Roughead?
I’m sure it will still happen but think we are waiting to see what late picks you have left. Think it will be Roughead and 63 for one of your picks.
That what the Report is.
But what Happens IF Beams trade goes down to the Wire?
What if times running out and we do one fun little three way trading rough/adams/beams and picks to respective clubs.
We will hold out for best offer but in reality won’t be too difficult on it and essentially take what we can getThat what the Report is.
But what Happens IF Beams trade goes down to the Wire?
We will hold out for best offer but in reality won’t be too difficult on it and essentially take what we can get
Roughie was offered a contract from us.Especially with you not Offering him a New Contract
Pretty sure we did but he said he wanted to explore free agencyEspecially with you not Offering him a New Contract
SEN reporting a 3 way deal which will see Roughead and Beams go to Collingwood and Adams to Brisbane.
Roughie was offered a contract from us.
He was definitely offered a contract by us, was mentioned by Sam Power, i guess a combination of a fresh start(he struggles to get a game)and a better deal(our offer must have been minimal.I read he did not.
Then why did he Knock you Back?
Deal done.
Roughead to Collingwood for pick 75.
Close enough.If it involved a trade, I’d imagine this’d be one of those pick 80 type agreements between the clubs to give him his chance elsewhere.
And in the end, the Dogs traded Roughead for less than Geelong traded Vardy, after Vardy had managed four games in three seasons. I guess the club didn't rate him as highly as you do.As far as denialist efforts go, this is idiotic even by BigFooty standards. It must be evident to you that your position is trash when you have to put this many caveats on it? Even worse: perhaps it actually isn’t?
Roughead is a better ruckman than Vardy because the game doesn’t stop once log Vardy lets the ball bounce off his lumbering melon in the vague direction of the opposition midfielders. But once that happens, he offers less than almost every other ruckman. And he only manages to do that 3 more times than a game Roughead. You’ve made such a dumb argument and you know it.
Why don’t you have another crack at it Kaveat King? Maybe you could even string a paragraph together? Or some new gem like ‘Nathan Vardy has had exactly 23 hitouts in Sunday twilight games one more time than Roughead so he’s better derperp’.
Keep the laughs coming KK!..