List Mgmt. Josh Kennedy signs contract extension (or does he?)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #26
Correlation does not prove causation, my breh

If he plays in 2020 he will be the eleventh player in club history to play aged 32+. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to flag that next year may be his last.
 
If he plays in 2020 he will be the eleventh player in club history to play aged 32+. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to flag that next year may be his last.

*14th, I excluded Mitchell, Petrie and Wiley since they only played a season at West Coast.

And actually LeCras will become the 12th if he plays a final this year, his 32nd birthday is next week. So that'd make Kennedy the 15th.

[/pedantry]
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #28
*14th, I excluded Mitchell, Petrie and Wiley since they only played a season at West Coast.

And actually LeCras will become the 12th if he plays a final this year, his 32nd birthday is next week. So that'd make Kennedy the 15th.

[/pedantry]

Given I think it’s the years of added travel that break WA based players down early, I think it’s fair to say those guys don’t count. Love a bit of pedantry.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I think it proves pretty well that, historically, Eagles players don’t tend to last too long after they hit 30.

Maybe it’s the increased travel, maybe it’s something in the water, but we haven’t exactly had an army of player contributing post 30.

Aside from the expansion clubs, are we the only club without a 300 game player in our history?
 
He turns 31 on Saturday and he's missed half the season through injuries.

Complete list of guys who've played more than one season for the Eagles and played past their 32nd birthday: Mainwaring, Cox, Glass, Hart, Matera, Priddis, Banfield, Kemp, Embley, Lamb.

Past their 33rd birthday: Mainwaring, Cox, Glass, Hart, Matera.

Past their 34th birthday: ...

This proves nothinhg

I think it proves pretty well that, historically, Eagles players don’t tend to last too long after they hit 30.

Maybe it’s the increased travel, maybe it’s something in the water, but we haven’t exactly had an army of player contributing post 30.
If none of you have read the new book Footballistics by the excellent James Coventry, you absolutely should.

https://shop.abc.net.au/footballistics

Western Australia doesn't have fewer players who make it to the 150 or 200-game marks. About the same percentage of players hit those milestones in the West as they do in South Australia and Victoria. But something seems to happen to players from the Eagles and Dockers once they have reached 200 matches. They retire between 200 and 250 games at a higher rate than players from anywhere else. Why is this the case?

This is an excerpt of a chapter on travel and home ground advantage. They use disposals as a proxy for performance, for all players post 1987 who played for teams in one state for their career.

bErvqE9.jpg



"The results are striking. Players' career trajectories are broadly similar across borderlines until they approach the 200-game mark. Western Australian and Victorian players, for example, follow a virtually identical arc up until that point. But beyond that, the average disposal counts for Western Australian- and Queensland-based players fall off a cliff, while those of their South Australian and Victorian counterparts barely decay at all. Players from New South Wales decline a little later and from a higher level than the Western Australian and Queenslanders. The picture looks much the same if we restrict the comparison only to those who play at least 200 games. The average output of Western Australian and Queensland players declines earlier and more rapidly than that of their counterparts from the other states, particularly Victoria and South Australia.

....

It is possible that the tendency for Western Australian players to have shorter careers, and for their performance to decay more quickly, is just a quirk or statistical anomoly that will eventually work itself out. But with more than 30 seasons of interstate competition now in the AFL/VFL history books, it seems more likely that the late-career woe of Western Australian players is real, and that travel is the probably culprit."
 
"But youse guys get more home games with a genuine advantage, and home town umpiring, and all the other s**t we get but youse guys get it more than us. All we get are 16-18 games in our home state and no home advantage except against interstate sides and the Vic teams that are s**t, which is half our home games. Nah. Nah. You can't send us to Geelong or Tassie, imagine how many people won't be able to go and see us play, hey? What's that? We've got 2 games in Perth this year? FFS AFL why you make us do all this travelling????"
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Wow looks like this was a great piece of journalistic work all round on this one...

Just to confirm, he did in fact signed an extension, shortly after a round of golf with Andrew Brayshaw’s dentist, Tupac Shakur and Elvis Presley.

And Black Hitler, and a spaceman making paninis.
 
He turns 31 on Saturday and he's missed half the season through injuries.

Complete list of guys who've played more than one season for the Eagles and played past their 32nd birthday: Mainwaring, Cox, Glass, Hart, Matera, Priddis, Banfield, Kemp, Embley, Lamb.

Past their 33rd birthday: Mainwaring, Cox, Glass, Hart, Matera.

Past their 34th birthday: ...

Hurn is gonna live forever :rainbow:
 
If none of you have read the new book Footballistics by the excellent James Coventry, you absolutely should.

https://shop.abc.net.au/footballistics



This is an excerpt of a chapter on travel and home ground advantage. They use disposals as a proxy for performance, for all players post 1987 who played for teams in one state for their career.

bErvqE9.jpg



"The results are striking. Players' career trajectories are broadly similar across borderlines until they approach the 200-game mark. Western Australian and Victorian players, for example, follow a virtually identical arc up until that point. But beyond that, the average disposal counts for Western Australian- and Queensland-based players fall off a cliff, while those of their South Australian and Victorian counterparts barely decay at all. Players from New South Wales decline a little later and from a higher level than the Western Australian and Queenslanders. The picture looks much the same if we restrict the comparison only to those who play at least 200 games. The average output of Western Australian and Queensland players declines earlier and more rapidly than that of their counterparts from the other states, particularly Victoria and South Australia.

....

It is possible that the tendency for Western Australian players to have shorter careers, and for their performance to decay more quickly, is just a quirk or statistical anomoly that will eventually work itself out. But with more than 30 seasons of interstate competition now in the AFL/VFL history books, it seems more likely that the late-career woe of Western Australian players is real, and that travel is the probably culprit."
Im going to be using this rather a lot

Cheers
 
If none of you have read the new book Footballistics by the excellent James Coventry, you absolutely should.

https://shop.abc.net.au/footballistics



This is an excerpt of a chapter on travel and home ground advantage. They use disposals as a proxy for performance, for all players post 1987 who played for teams in one state for their career.

bErvqE9.jpg



"The results are striking. Players' career trajectories are broadly similar across borderlines until they approach the 200-game mark. Western Australian and Victorian players, for example, follow a virtually identical arc up until that point. But beyond that, the average disposal counts for Western Australian- and Queensland-based players fall off a cliff, while those of their South Australian and Victorian counterparts barely decay at all. Players from New South Wales decline a little later and from a higher level than the Western Australian and Queenslanders. The picture looks much the same if we restrict the comparison only to those who play at least 200 games. The average output of Western Australian and Queensland players declines earlier and more rapidly than that of their counterparts from the other states, particularly Victoria and South Australia.

....

It is possible that the tendency for Western Australian players to have shorter careers, and for their performance to decay more quickly, is just a quirk or statistical anomoly that will eventually work itself out. But with more than 30 seasons of interstate competition now in the AFL/VFL history books, it seems more likely that the late-career woe of Western Australian players is real, and that travel is the probably culprit."

Evidence enough for the AFL to give us a fair crack of the whip when it comes to travel, both distance and frequency.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top