Remove this Banner Ad

Traded Judd McVee [traded to Fremantle for pick #23]

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If you’d draft a player at pick 23 and you get McVee you’d be very happy.

Good get by Freo, and good on them working to get a better pick for the trade.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

How come the Dees have Danster rolling in telling us Jesus was the first coming of McVee but Freo's got Sherriff Incorporated doing the opposite of what is required?

Will the Freo Danster please stand up.

#F5_take_it_or_leave_it
Trade ended up being close to my scenarios. I would have rather have kept pick 12 even if it meant trading our second and a future 2027 second with the 2025 Brisbane third rounder Melbourne owns coming back in a compromised draft honestly. (my last suggestion)
I copped a ton of criticism for saying our second rounder wouldn't get it done so Im sure there will be apologies coming.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Trade ended up being close to my scenarios. I would have rather have kept pick 12 even if it meant trading our second and a future 2027 second with the 2025 Brisbane third rounder Melbourne owns coming back in a compromised draft honestly. (my last suggestion)
I copped a ton of criticism for saying our second rounder wouldn't get it done so Im sure there will be apologies coming.
Not from me you didn't (unless I did when drunk).
 
23 is prob fair but can't help but think Hawthorn/Geelong/Brisbane would have offered 33 and said take it or leave it. I think Wallsy needs to be more ruthless.

I think the clubs have a pretty good history of getting fair trades done without the halabaluh. It's a good deal for Freo.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Pick 12 to Essendon for 20 and 26 and 26 + 33 for McVee and 41 feels about right. Freo probably dont care about going from 33 to 41 since it will go to Toby Whan anyway
What the hell is this?

Judd McVee was out of contract. Why do we have to bend over to trade pick 12 to get picks 20 and 26?

Then trade pick 26 and 33 for Judd McVee and pick 41?

Why trade a couple of 2nd rounders for a bloke that is out of contract?
 
So.... What happened? Are you happy with the Judd McVee trade? Demons got pick 23 for him.

I guess you thought Fremantle were stupid enough to hand you 2 or 3 future 1st round picks lol
course not. No pick would've been good enough. Just stiff that he was out of contract.

But pick 23 is a bargain so enjoy. he'll be your best defender from day 1. just like Jackson was ur best player.

Very frustrating that freo cant develop their own kids
 
course not. No pick would've been good enough. Just stiff that he was out of contract.

But pick 23 is a bargain so enjoy. he'll be your best defender from day 1. just like Jackson was ur best player.

Very frustrating that freo cant develop their own kids
I suppose a garbage response is what Freomaniac deserves but my God is it real hot stinky garbage
 
What the hell is this?

Judd McVee was out of contract. Why do we have to bend over to trade pick 12 to get picks 20 and 26?

Then trade pick 26 and 33 for Judd McVee and pick 41?

Why trade a couple of 2nd rounders for a bloke that is out of contract?
you realise in that scenario Freo would have ended up with 20 and 41 and instead have ended up with 19?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top