Bingo, there is no way I would want Hawthorn paying 1.3 million a season over 5 years, for a bloke who isn't even the best mid in the comp.
If Judd was on a reasonable salary then Judd.
Applying that logic, I'd rather have Tyrone Vickery than Lance Franklin at Carlton.
Of course I wouldn't. But the minute you start doing a cost-benefit analysis, based on player salaries (the amounts of which you're only guessing, by the way) you're dabbling in crazy-speak. Or just trying to find a reason, ANY reason, to not choose Judd.





