- Sep 27, 2012
- 28,095
- 55,355
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Bushrangers Tottenham Hotspur
Well you have revealed yourself...That link isn't an opinion piece. It is directly quoting Bolt and the judge. Get some perspective on this. When presented with all the evidence the judge was damming of Bolt. Bolt wasn't in breach of the act due to his 'opinion' he was in breach of the act because his arguments were completely disconnected from fact. The law never provides allowance for deliberate and gross misrepresentation of the facts to discredit others. Prior to 18c the defamation laws were inadequate to facilitate legal action on the basis or racial discrimination of this kind due to the assessment of what constitutes damage etc. The 18c clause makes clear what should have already being captured by defamation laws. The law actually protects discussions in good faith. Bolt demonstrated a complete lack of good faith in divorcing his argument from fact. IF you have a problem with what the Judge said then please, point out where he went wrong otherwise claiming the case was an utter disgrace just comes across as hysterical. Bolt doesn't campaign for censorship, he practices it and campaigns for the means to continue to practice it.
I gave up reading The Age a long time ago, not worth thew paper it's printed on. I never said it was an opinion piece. I am not the one being hysterical here. To say Bolt practices censorship and campaigns for the means to continue to practice it is simply wrong.
What do you mean I have revealed myself?