It was so distressing I fell to my knees in a Kmart when I read the news.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
It was so distressing I fell to my knees in a Kmart when I read the news.
Kinda distressing that the 3 trade ins seemingly got to pick first.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Omg Baker wears a number 3 on his back and Graham wears a number 17. I'm never going to get over this how could the club do this to us![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Cry more.
Reid pretty much put in an ambit claim on #9 before he was even drafted, there was no chance he wasn't getting it.I'm guessing top 10 or so picks would have access to higher numbers like Reid last year.
Anyone complaining about this years numbers, need to reference Matt Flynn given the #25 last year.
Should just go alphabetically
Numbers would change pretty much every year
Sent from my SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app
1. Archer
Don't mind who wears what but my main hope was we give a gun kid 17 to have a chance of keeping the premiership in no.17 alive.
Maybe Graham will be our Stenglein
Sent from my SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app
So 3 is gonna blow out to #78The player makes the number, not the other way around.
?But have we had a player wear 17 who hasn't been a premiership player?We have premiership streaks in #4, #14, #17 and #18.
With #6 and #20 playing in our last 3 flags, only missing out in 1992.
Also not a huge fan how they had so many players change numbers after years of playing under one. Rioli jr fair enough as its his dads but the others its weird
