Just to annoy Dan

[Dave]

Now that his post count has been added to Dan26 it should be removed from Dan25! Otherwise we'll end up with a top ten posters list full of Dans

 

[Jars458]

Yes Dave but all that would do is confirm our suspicions that Dan26 has NO LIFE whatsoever

He can rule as king of the mundane post count and we will all be happy.

 

[Portia]

Originally posted by Dave
Now that his post count has been added to Dan26 it should be removed from Dan25! Otherwise we'll end up with a top ten posters list full of Dans

Actually he shouldn't be allowed to add his old count to his current one, because those posts were made in entirely different conditions, there should be no follow on to any new aliases. Sure, its the same Dan, but the name is entirely different, there's different people posting here. Obviously he should start from scratch, but still be compared with people that have kept the same nick since bigfooty started.

Well, thats what he reckons Port Adelaide should do anyway.

 

[elt]

Re: Re: Just to annoy Dan

Originally posted by Porthos
Actually he shouldn't be allowed to add his old count to his current one, because those posts were made in entirely different conditions, there should be no follow on to any new aliases. Sure, its the same Dan, but the name is entirely different, there's different people posting here. Obviously he should start from scratch, but still be compared with people that have kept the same nick since bigfooty started.

 

[Jars458]

Re: Re: Just to annoy Dan

Originally posted by Porthos


Actually he shouldn't be allowed to add his old count to his current one, because those posts were made in entirely different conditions, there should be no follow on to any new aliases. Sure, its the same Dan, but the name is entirely different, there's different people posting here. Obviously he should start from scratch, but still be compared with people that have kept the same nick since bigfooty started.

Well, thats what he reckons Port Adelaide should do anyway.

Touche

The sad thing is he will get into a real argument regarding that comparison and think that we care.

 

[Stealth bomber]

Beautiful.

Then he will say that he's the most successful poster on BigFooty, and call himself the "Manchester United" of BigFooty.

 

[Shinboners]

Re: Re: Just to annoy Dan

Originally posted by Porthos


Actually he shouldn't be allowed to add his old count to his current one, because those posts were made in entirely different conditions, there should be no follow on to any new aliases. Sure, its the same Dan, but the name is entirely different, there's different people posting here. Obviously he should start from scratch, but still be compared with people that have kept the same nick since bigfooty started.

You have a point there, but I think that the vast majority of Dan's posts are just his old posts but with the words re-arranged plus a few insults. I liken it to going to a footy game, then going home and watching the video tape of the game, waking up the following morning and watching the tape again, and then going to the pub and telling your mates that you've watched THREE games of footy.

Since Dan has only really ever posted about no more than half a dozen issues (let's see....minor premiership, Essendon were the best team in 1999 even though they didn't actually play in the Grand Final, Port Adelaide has a history of only 5 years, crowd figures, Essendon and Carlton are bigger rivals than Carlton and Collingwood, and finally, trying to crack onto Spidey), his post count should really be reduced by about 87%.

 

[Dippers Donuts]

Re: Re: Re: Just to annoy Dan

Originally posted by Shinboners


You have a point there, but I think that the vast majority of Dan's posts are just his old posts but with the words re-arranged plus a few insults. I liken it to going to a footy game, then going home and watching the video tape of the game, waking up the following morning and watching the tape again, and then going to the pub and telling your mates that you've watched THREE games of footy.

Since Dan has only really ever posted about no more than half a dozen issues (let's see....minor premiership, Essendon were the best team in 1999 even though they didn't actually play in the Grand Final, Port Adelaide has a history of only 5 years, crowd figures, Essendon and Carlton are bigger rivals than Carlton and Collingwood, and finally, trying to crack onto Spidey), his post count should really be reduced by about 87%.

nice one, but i think he's only ever posted on 2 or 3 issues, in which case his post count should come down by 96.4%

 

[Grendel]

Re: Re: Re: Just to annoy Dan

Originally posted by Shinboners


I liken it to going to a footy game, then going home and watching the video tape of the game, waking up the following morning and watching the tape again, and then going to the pub and telling your mates that you've watched THREE games of footy.

That is quite possibly the best summation of a poster ive ever seen on this site! Scary!!

 

[Stealth bomber]

Shins, you forgot the soccer threads.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

Where are you Dan? Surely you have read this by now?

 

[Dave]

I don't think he's talking to me anymore, unless it's to call me a moron

 

[Stealth bomber]

It isn't like him to resist threads with his name in them.

 

[Shinboners]

Originally posted by Stealth bomber
Shins, you forgot the soccer threads.

They don't count. We're pretty sure that he just cuts and pastes whatever he reads on soccernet.

Where's Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink from?.....hee hee hee

 

[NICK THE PIE MAN]

Don't worry guys,
this will get him to the topic...

COLLINGWOOD HAVE A BIGGER SUPPORTER BASE.

 

[mantis]

Originally posted by NICK THE PIE MAN
Don't worry guys,
this will get him to the topic...

COLLINGWOOD HAVE A BIGGER SUPPORTER BASE.

Nick I am going to have to smack you.

 

[Shinboners]

Originally posted by NICK THE PIE MAN
Don't worry guys,
this will get him to the topic...

COLLINGWOOD HAVE A BIGGER SUPPORTER BASE.

Nah. How about "A minor premier who doesn't win the Grand Final are obviously CHOKERS and cannot be considered the best team for the year".

 

[Dave]

Or "Second place is much better than third. I hate it that anyone would say otherwise."