Hasnt done any of that.
Not sure if serious.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hasnt done any of that.
The pick swap was a piece of genius from S.O.S. Only swapping 5 for 8 and Stocker is great business. Then there's the Gibbs trade.
Really bold call going early on our draftees. Definitely hasn't backfired on anyone in the past.Not sure about Reid.
But when do we start to question Hamish Ogilvie in wasting first rounders on Gooch and Jones.
Neither will be elite. Their ceiling is the level our mids are now.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Imagine if directed all the energy and money we used on Gibbs on retaining lever and Cameron.
Even number 1 psychophant mark bickley slammed the list mgmt.
SOJ- Son of John - wtf
Reid isn't the guy that decides to resign guys like Lynch and Walker.
The coaches and head of football make the call on who they want to stay and the list manager's job is to execute.
I know your pissed. But, Carlton will still likely finish 16th, and we will likely finish 9th. So, the swap is more accurately (probably) going to be 3 for 10/19 (Stocker). 5 for 8 is not happening.The pick swap was a piece of genius from S.O.S. Only swapping 5 for 8 and Stocker is great business. Then there's the Gibbs trade.
The Gibbs trade in retrospect has not worked. The pick swap - I still think was gutsy move. Not often that our club shows balls like that.Reid isn't the guy that decides to resign guys like Lynch and Walker.
The coaches and head of football make the call on who they want to stay and the list manager's job is to execute.
Cameron didn't leave because of money, but I am sure the $850K (before tax) and $800K (before tax) in the bank of Lever and McGovern states otherwise.Lever and Cameron didn't leave because of money. Like McGovern they had checked out.
Also a bit of a feel good exercise in what a lot supporters considered "righting a wrong"In retrospect I now tend to think Gibbs was done solely as a feel good PR exercise.
We were getting slammed in the media over the grand final, we then had all the bad PR with Lever and then Cameron's departure.
The club most probably thought that as they had a stock pile of first rounders that year that they could pull the trigger on a Gibbs trade and it would be a circuit breaker to give the club something positive to sell to the supporters.
I would suggest Ogilvie's lack of identifying top shelf midfield talent is a bigger issue than Reid.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I think there’s an element of that and Gallucci is going to be an average player.Honestly think we’ve gotten sucked into going for the speculative ‘funky’ kind of picks - because we had success with them in the past (Danger, Doedee).
I was unhappy at the time with the cost and age. You pay 2 first rounders for a Coniglio, Neale not a 28yo Gibbs.I was really pleased when we got Gibbs. Not pleased now. Justin Reid would probably be feeling the same way!!
In retrospect I now tend to think Gibbs was done solely as a feel good PR exercise.
We were getting slammed in the media over the grand final, we then had all the bad PR with Lever and then Cameron's departure.
The club most probably thought that as they had a stock pile of first rounders that year that they could pull the trigger on a Gibbs trade and it would be a circuit breaker to give the club something positive to sell to the supporters.