Geez, the bloke likes his hair. That's a disgrace! There's just no way he can make it as a footballer...
A preemptive 1990's hair revival is sooo much cooler than growing a shit beard after it's gone beyond being cool anymore.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Geez, the bloke likes his hair. That's a disgrace! There's just no way he can make it as a footballer...
Mitchell goes alright but I haven't really seen much to suggest he is going to be a long-term AFL player. With that being said, it's not like Power used an early pick on him or anything so he doesn't really need to be. Adds some energy to the Port side, especially when used as a sub.
I'd also like to know why he is a prick? I don't blame you guys for wanting/thinking he'll fail at AFL level. It's human nature to want to see someone you dislike fail.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Bootsma is not very good. Mick Malthouse is coaching a bottom eight side so that's hardly an endorsement. Bootsma is like a deer in the headlights. He has no cool and has no idea on how to position – a pretty questionable flaw when you're a defender...You're just getting sillier. Between this and your uneducated comments on Josh Bootsma (who has a fan in Mick Malthouse) it's becoming clear you either can't identify potential in a player or don't actually know anything about the players you're commenting on.
Interesting that the people outside of Perth are the ones sticking up for him.I'd like to know this too. It's completely at odds with what I've heard.
I'm as much "outside of Perth" as you are. I'm a West Aussie living in Melbourne. I've not heard anything bad from people I know who have met / know Kane.Interesting that the people outside of Perth are the ones sticking up for him.
Look, he isn't Hitler and he's not a genuinely awful or evil person at all. He just has an ego. And his hair has a lot to do with his career. You can say that's bullshit, but here's something that might be shocking: the AFL, and playing AFL, is a lot of luck and bullshit.
The people in WA are also the people saying he's not that good. Because he isn't. Even in the slower, less intense world of the WAFL, he was still just an athlete.
That's not true. There is so much wank in AFL recruitment and you're giving too much credit to them. Those WAFL umpires are not full time and are barely part time. They get paid so little. In a game of congestion, someone with a high fitness base will be around the packs constantly; and someone with long hair will be the most obvious contender. "That bloke with long hair was around the footy a lot."The suggestion that his hair has in any way influenced a club's decision to pick him up is just laughable tbh. It's not 1986 any more. AFL recruiters work full time, and while they mightn't all agree on him someone saw enough to pick him up and that's good enough for me.
How many recruiters do you know? I'm intrigued. The ones I know can tell me a lot about a lot of different players - strengths, weaknesses, what can be fixed, what can't be. None has ever discussed a player's hair with me. Of course they noticed that Kane got a lot of the pill. He did. His hair had nothing to do with that.That's not true. There is so much wank in AFL recruitment and you're giving too much credit to them. Those WAFL umpires are not full time and are barely part time. They get paid so little. In a game of congestion, someone with a high fitness base will be around the packs constantly; and someone with long hair will be the most obvious contender. "That bloke with long hair was around the footy a lot."
As I was saying it sounds like it's more your ability to spot talent that's not very good. Chosen for senior football in both his first and second seasons despite his inexperience suggests he's going ok. As for his positioning, he's rated by Gavin Brown as the best spoiler at the club, ahead of Jamison and Laidler and us very rarely out marked by anyone despite his size. I would think Mick Malthouse and Gavin Brown know a bit more about this stuff than you.Bootsma is not very good. Mick Malthouse is coaching a bottom eight side so that's hardly an endorsement. Bootsma is like a deer in the headlights. He has no cool and has no idea on how to position – a pretty questionable flaw when you're a defender
He's had a dip and gone alright but wouldn't get a game at any team that's in serious contention.
Geez, the bloke likes his hair. That's a disgrace! There's just no way he can make it as a footballer...
Looks like he reads the play well, one of the key elements of being a natural footballer, dunno what your opinion is based on.Prick of a bloke, not a natural footballer, and won't play 50 games. Barely denial.
That seems to be the suggestion from some posters in this thread. I'm not one of them.Because you're not a man if you don't have a crew cut, right?
Don't think he was serious...................Because you're not a man if you don't have a crew cut, right?
WOW! looks like someones jealous!That's not true. There is so much wank in AFL recruitment and you're giving too much credit to them. Those WAFL umpires are not full time and are barely part time. They get paid so little. In a game of congestion, someone with a high fitness base will be around the packs constantly; and someone with long hair will be the most obvious contender. "That bloke with long hair was around the footy a lot."
Don't think he was serious...................
PortMagic Schulzenfest Sin CityTruly elite endurance. Absolutely awful kick. Would be hated by any team that drafted him.