DropBearess
Premium Platinum
- Apr 3, 2019
- 370
- 1,038
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
But what about her diaries and her own documentation that one of her children left "with a little help from me"?.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One of the scientists was on the telly this morning but I honestly couldn't understand her (lack of coffee on my part maybe) but picked up the gist of what she was saying as in some gene which affects females ...but what about the male babies? I'm confused.But what about her diaries and her own documentation that one of her children left "with a little help from me"?.
One of the scientists was on the telly this morning but I honestly couldn't understand her (lack of coffee on my part maybe) but picked up the gist of what she was saying as in some gene which affects females ...but what about the male babies? I'm confused.
Ahhh ok. I thought she was saying only the females carried the gene, just shows how easily things can get distorted,lol. But as DropBearess says what about the diary.Two babies apparently had the gene which was inherited from the mother and the other two had a variant of the same gene. I think ... so all four would be susceptible.
But what about her diaries and her own documentation that one of her children left "with a little help from me"?.
Ahhh ok. I thought she was saying only the females carried the gene, just shows how easily things can get distorted,lol. But as DropBearess says what about the diary.
Did you read the article?If a man did this would people be so sympathetic?
Four kids died. How many other families with a 'genetic defect' have had four infants die like this?Did you read the article?
Nothing to do with it being a woman or a man it is a conviction not based on scientific evidence that is available.
"There are more than 150 scientists and doctors, many of them leaders in their fields, now saying there's a genetic basis for the cause of deaths of Sarah and Laura, based on rigorous scientific evaluation," Ms Rego said.
It is in all likelihood that it is a gentic flaw that caused their deaths.......so yeah, a man did this too.
I have no idea why you are insistant on making this an issue about men vs women.Four kids died. How many other families with a 'genetic defect' have had four infants die like this?
If a father was accused I doubt these crimes would be viewed in the same light.
What about the other two kids? What does the 'science' say about them?I have no idea why you are insistant on making this an issue about men vs women.
It is not at issue that 4 children died and that it is a tragic case.
It is about a miscarriage of justice in the face of scientific evidence.
What about the other two kids? What does the 'science' say about them?
I have no idea why you are insistant on making this an issue about men vs women.
It is not at issue that 4 children died and that it is a tragic case.
It is about a miscarriage of justice in the face of scientific evidence.
You obviously did not read the article I posted but want to straddle a hobby horse of your own bias.
If you know the case in detail the husband has never been helpful to his then wife. That he wouldn't help with the provision of DNA now in the interests of getting to the truth leaves one thinking well what has he got to hide.'The former husband of convicted child killer Kathleen Folbigg is refusing to give a DNA sample and has withdrawn from an inquiry that could exonerate her over the deaths of their four infant children more than two decades ago.'
The success of Folbigg’s bid for freedom will hang on the strength of the new genetic evidence, which has been championed by some of the nation’s leading scientists, but Craig Folbigg’s refusal to provide DNA will limit the scope of the inquiry.
Mr Folbigg’s DNA has the potential to provide “considerable assistance” and reveal if he passed on any genetic mutations that could have led to the children’s deaths and establish from whom the boys inherited genetic mutations.
Experts divided over whether genetic mutation could clear child killer Folbigg, inquiry told
Almost 20 years after Kathleen Folbigg was convicted of killing her four children, an inquiry is told of new research regarding a genetic mutation.www.abc.net.au
Push continues for her release, but it says 2 of her kids didnt even have this genetic mutation. So its 2 from the genetic mutation (which she has and seems to be just fine) and 2 from SIDS?
I mean if it was a single father who had the 4 kids what would we be thinking the odds of nature rather than the parent?
Push continues for her release, but it says 2 of her kids didnt even have this genetic mutation. So its 2 from the genetic mutation (which she has and seems to be just fine) and 2 from SIDS?
If you know the case in detail the husband has never been helpful to his then wife. That he wouldn't help with the provision of DNA now in the interests of getting to the truth leaves one thinking well what has he got to hide.
Maybe it has something to do with the recent historical unsolved cases now solved by DNA?He might be afraid of what science might find, that he and Kathleen are related by the first degree? Something like that.