bomberclifford
Importer/Exporter
He won't be. Next year's aim is stability - i.e. a mid-table also ran.
Ignoring the mid-table also ran comment, stability is most definitely high on the agenda.
People have either forgotten, or didn't fully grasp, how far back we were coming from, not just in an on-field sense, but off-field as well.
This year and next were always going to be about stability and consolidation after a massive transitional process. From a board/strategic perspective I totally get why they wanted to extend Hinkley, or at the very least, ensure he didn't leave for Gold Coast.
Set your plan and work to it. This will at times clash with the supporter expectation, but ultimately, a board and CEO need to have calmer heads than that. Their goal was to extend Hinkley for 2 years, his manager's goal was to get longer. The board made the call that in the long term benefits of the club, it is better to cede the extra year than pull down the entire plan. Remember, we've lost Burgess already this year, losing Hinkely as well would send out a ripple of negativity to the vast majority of our membership. Not everyone thinks like us obsessed freaks on BigFooty.
So far along this journey, KT, Koch et al have rarely let us down. Yes they've made some missteps, but on the whole we're on an upwards trajectory.
I trust KT. He's a good operator.
Koch has also shown that he's capable of listening.





