I might be wrong, but I've just spent half an hour trawling through any threads applicable to the US elections, and I can't find one mention of vote fraud. Just because the mainstream media won't touch it doesn't mean it isn't a big story. There's been stuff going on in Ohio and Florida that looks very, very fishy.
Between the hillbillies on this board who find it impossible to raise themselves from simple denigration of anyone to the left of Hitler, and most of the rest, who can actually spend seven pages debating whether the deliberate shooting of an unarmed, injured Iraqi constitutes a contravention of the Geneva convention, you'd think we could find some time to discuss something of real interest.
Here's some stuff to chew over:
In 29 Ohio precincts, more votes were officially cast than there are voters registered.
In the nation's first academic study of the Florida 2004 vote, University of California, Berkeley graduate students and a professor have found intriguing evidence that electronic-voting counties there could have mistakenly awarded up to 260,000 votes to President Bush.
Exit polls indicated a comfortable win to Kerry. Yet the results swung right back to a large Bush win. Exit polls are generally regarded as reliable predictors of elections results - they are even used to help track poll fraud in other countries. Yet in the USA it's the exit poll results that are bing questioned. Which would be ok if they were uniformly out. But they weren't.
In most stated - and particularly in those where punch card voting was used - exit polls reflected actual results pretty accurately. But in those areas where Diebold electronic voiting machines were used, there was little correlation between exit polls and results.
More interestingly, the swing was all toward the Republican Party. In some cases way beyond what could statistically be expected.
Look, that's just the tip of the iceberg. You can find out a lot more if you care to go looking for it. I just can't believe it's not being discussed here.