Kevin's Curse

Daytripper

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 9, 2003
Posts
15,677
Likes
767
Location
Reebok Stadium
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Bolton,Clippers,Falcons,Mariners
Thread starter #1
I found this amusing.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/sp...ts-lost-to-labor/story-fn5ko0pw-1225909632607

IT'S being called Kevin's Curse. All but one of the seven seats Kevin Rudd visited in the final days of the election campaign were lost by Labor.

The former PM had no magic touch with voters, reinforcing the view of ALP insiders that it was the right call by Julia Gillard to replace him.

Mr Rudd visited the seats of Bonner, Flynn, Herbert, Brisbane and Moreton.

He also made surprise appearances in the electorate of Melbourne and the Sydney seat of Bennelong.

"It's the curse of Kevin," said one Labor insider. "He was not the campaign asset that he claimed to be."
If only the ALP factions weren't smart enough to replace him with Gillard. One intelligent thing they did all campaign.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Doctor Jolly

Premiership Player
Suspended
Joined
Sep 28, 2006
Posts
4,531
Likes
238
Location
sydney
AFL Club
Sydney
#2
I'm inclined to think that if they stuck with Kevin Rudd, labor might have won. Would have been only by a whisker, but better than where they are now.
 

Clay Davis

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Posts
19,993
Likes
1,821
Location
ge
AFL Club
Fremantle
#3
How many people would he meet during his visits to these places? 50? 100? 1000? Would he change any votes by being there?

The 'Labor insiders' are trying to blame everyone but themselves.
 

jo172

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 23, 2004
Posts
15,468
Likes
10,385
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
San Antonio, Redbacks
#4
I'm still waiting for an explanation for the early election regardless of who was leading.
 

Daytripper

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 9, 2003
Posts
15,677
Likes
767
Location
Reebok Stadium
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Bolton,Clippers,Falcons,Mariners
Thread starter #5
I'm inclined to think that if they stuck with Kevin Rudd, labor might have won. Would have been only by a whisker, but better than where they are now.
Its 6 for one and half-dozen the other.

On one hand they 'may' not have got belted in Qld as much as they did. But on the other hand Gillard may have saved some seats in Vic and SA. And Rudd may even have performed worse in WA as well.

I'm of the opinion that Gillard saved Labor from a majority defeat.

Rudd simply became unelectable in the end.
 
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Posts
1,810
Likes
2
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Arsenal
#6
Been rich to blame Rudd for those losers


Queensland had been considered a loss for Labor before Rudd "rejoined" the campaign


In Melbourne (where i live), Tanner had been fighting off the Greens for years. It was only because of local admiration for him that Labor was able to hold off the Greens previously. What's more, the new ALP candidate Cath Bowtell was only given about 6 weeks to establish herself in a marginal electorate.


ALP's poor performance wasn't because of Rudd, or really Gillard. More to do with these "faceless men" who set the overall strategy and ran the campaign.
 

Doctor Jolly

Premiership Player
Suspended
Joined
Sep 28, 2006
Posts
4,531
Likes
238
Location
sydney
AFL Club
Sydney
#7
Rudd simply became unelectable in the end.

Thats just your extreme rightwing view. Labor didnt lose to the libs, they lost to the greens and independents. Even when deposed, he was still prefered PM. I think Rudd had a lot of currency with non-interested voters. The same voters who deserted labor to the greens
 

Subprime

Premiership Player
Joined
Sep 27, 2007
Posts
3,968
Likes
435
Location
Ether
AFL Club
Collingwood
#8
One thing the deposing of Rudd has done is expose the party's innards for all to see and it ain't pretty. That wouldn't have happened if he'd been left to fight the election.

There was an interview with Morris Iemma on ABC radio this morning and he hoed into Bitar and Arbib relentlessly, blaming them for losing votes in multicultural parts of Sydney's ALP heartland. I'd never heard of these guys 3 months ago.
 

Doctor Jolly

Premiership Player
Suspended
Joined
Sep 28, 2006
Posts
4,531
Likes
238
Location
sydney
AFL Club
Sydney
#10
ALP's poor performance wasn't because of Rudd, or really Gillard. More to do with these "faceless men" who set the overall strategy and ran the campaign.
Its these faceless men that Rudd had under control from 2006 to early 2010.
The brought NSW's disease to federal politics.

If you believe the rumour that Rudd had already negotiated the MRRT (modifed one resources tax) and was set to announce it, but the faceless men saw it as an opportunity to get Gillard in and get an early win.
 
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Posts
1,810
Likes
2
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Arsenal
#11
Its 6 for one and half-dozen the other.

On one hand they 'may' not have got belted in Qld as much as they did. But on the other hand Gillard may have saved some seats in Vic and SA. And Rudd may even have performed worse in WA as well.

I'm of the opinion that Gillard saved Labor from a majority defeat.

Rudd simply became unelectable in the end.
Hear what you're saying, but the vast majority of votes that Labor lost have gone to Greens / informal / Ind


The Coalition is not impressive, Labor is not impressive


Don't necessary think Gillard saved Labor from a major defeat & Rudd was not unelectable - he won the previous election from Howard, so he knows how to win a campaign. His problem was the campaign machine behind him, who also advised Gillard.


Don't shoot the messager, shoot the message
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Doctor Jolly

Premiership Player
Suspended
Joined
Sep 28, 2006
Posts
4,531
Likes
238
Location
sydney
AFL Club
Sydney
#12
One thing the deposing of Rudd has done is expose the party's innards for all to see and it ain't pretty. That wouldn't have happened if he'd been left to fight the election.

There was an interview with Morris Iemma on ABC radio this morning and he hoed into Bitar and Arbib relentlessly, blaming them for losing votes in multicultural parts of Sydney's ALP heartland. I'd never heard of these guys 3 months ago.
I'm not sure about Iemma, but Rees' (prior to Kennelly) was non-factional like Rudd, and had some reasonable reform policies before the factions dumped him.

Its a disease.
 

Subprime

Premiership Player
Joined
Sep 27, 2007
Posts
3,968
Likes
435
Location
Ether
AFL Club
Collingwood
#13
I'm not sure about Iemma, but Rees' (prior to Kennelly) was non-factional like Rudd, and had some reasonable reform policies before the factions dumped him.

Its a disease.
I've always liked Iemma, I get a feeling he barracks for the Pies.:thumbsu:

He should run for federal politics.
 

showdownhero

Premiership Player
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Posts
4,384
Likes
1,519
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
on a journey through time and space
#14
Thats just your extreme rightwing view. Labor didnt lose to the libs, they lost to the greens and independents. Even when deposed, he was still prefered PM. I think Rudd had a lot of currency with non-interested voters. The same voters who deserted labor to the greens
Labor lost one seat to the greens and one to an independent. All green preferences went to Labor anyway so I'm not sure if I agree with you.

Surely you would agree that in Queensland Labor was defeated (quite comprehensively) by the Libs?
 

Doctor Jolly

Premiership Player
Suspended
Joined
Sep 28, 2006
Posts
4,531
Likes
238
Location
sydney
AFL Club
Sydney
#15
Labor lost one seat to the greens and one to an independent. All green preferences went to Labor anyway so I'm not sure if I agree with you.

Surely you would agree that in Queensland Labor was defeated (quite comprehensively) by the Libs?
I should have also said, lost a lot to informal votes who were probably disillusioned labor voters p1ssed off the the "faceless" men.
 

Daytripper

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 9, 2003
Posts
15,677
Likes
767
Location
Reebok Stadium
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Bolton,Clippers,Falcons,Mariners
Thread starter #16
I should have also said, lost a lot to informal votes who were probably disillusioned labor voters p1ssed off the the "faceless" men.
Its a bit rich to claim they were probably disillusioned Labor voters.

After all, they were most probably Coalition voters whilst Howard was PM and who only switched over at the last election.

I know its hard for people to accept but people did actually vote Howard in four terms in a row. There are a lot of people out there who have voted Coalition in the past.
 

Inferno

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Mar 7, 2006
Posts
5,655
Likes
2,986
Location
Tramland
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
Charlotte Hornets
#17
Been rich to blame Rudd for those losers


Queensland had been considered a loss for Labor before Rudd "rejoined" the campaign


In Melbourne (where i live), Tanner had been fighting off the Greens for years. It was only because of local admiration for him that Labor was able to hold off the Greens previously. What's more, the new ALP candidate Cath Bowtell was only given about 6 weeks to establish herself in a marginal electorate.


ALP's poor performance wasn't because of Rudd, or really Gillard. More to do with these "faceless men" who set the overall strategy and ran the campaign.
To be fair Tanner only announced he was leaving the day Rudd got knifed, and I think the Greens would have won even if everyone knew Bowtell would be the candidate 6 months ago (though not by quite as much).

I think Rudd would have saved a few seats in Qld if he was still in charge, which would easily offset the seats in Vic that Gillard won (and also holding onto Corangamite) that Rudd wouldn't of. The polls for Rudd were about the same as they were on the eve of the election for Gillard, I think an established PM would have had done better. Gillard was almost like an opposition leader rather then a PM, and there was little difference in policy between her and Rudd.

And yeah people within the ALP want to use Rudd as the scapegoat for their own failures. The strategy was ridiculous, both the election strategy and the Rudd knifing strategy. I think in all honestly they expected Rudd to quit, and then they could have just dismissed any leaks as Rudd being bitter.
 

Chief

110% sass!
Joined
Dec 1, 1999
Posts
72,431
Likes
42,468
Location
Brisbane
AFL Club
Carlton
Admin #18
ALP's poor performance wasn't because of Rudd, or really Gillard. More to do with these "faceless men" who set the overall strategy and ran the campaign.
Abbott and Co talk about the "faceless men", then name them. Then next time they get their face on TV they mention "faceless men", then they name them.

These guys seem to be the most well-known "faceless men" in existence.
 

evo

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Posts
27,407
Likes
16,976
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
#19
Abbott and Co talk about the "faceless men", then name them. Then next time they get their face on TV they mention "faceless men", then they name them.

These guys seem to be the most well-known "faceless men" in existence.
Hehe. It's like the ubiquitous "under rated" player. They talk about him on the footy show, in the paper, thread after thread is started about him.
 
Top Bottom