A non-football advantage of having Buddy at the Dockers is that he might help balance out the tv coverage / column space / general media adulation associated with Nic Nat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Imagine this hypothetical scenario - Hogan makes it clear to Dees he doesn't want to be any part of Melbourne's future plans / will not re-sign at contract end / will appeal to AFL to be released for homesickness / etc, while Dockers simultaneously offer to trade for a combination of players from Sheridan / Clarke / Neale / Mellington.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It would cost us a fair wack. Either a 3 way deal where the Dee's get access to a top 6 pick and we cough up at least 2 young talents or we have to give them our top 2 picks and 1 top quality junior and genuine best-10-players at the club type. They always have the option to threaten to let him walk where he would go pick one in either draft whether he professed a desire to back to WA or not.
I think it is highly unlikey we will ever get him.
I think we have a chance of getting Gumby, Pears and Taylor
Hurley, Crameri, Daniher Gumby. Which one loses in this scenario?
Hooker, Carlisle, Hurley? Too tall. Pears to usHurley goes back, Crameri rightfully plays as third tall.

Hurley, Crameri, Daniher Gumby. Which one loses in this scenario?
Hooker, Carlisle, Hurley? Too tall. Pears to us![]()
Hooker, Carlisle, Hurley? Too tall. Pears to us![]()

You're a big wrap on Pears. I like him, but you've got a little crush it seems.
Care to expand?
I also don't understand the Hogan love by some here.
He's no world-beater. And we aren't at panic stations just yet.
I like Pears. He's suffered a bit with injury but his first few years were very good. Has good disposal, perhaps a little small for the really tall forwards. Guys like him who are decent, and being squeezed out would be good to have a crack at.You're a big wrap on Pears. I like him, but you've got a little crush it seems.
Care to expand?
I also don't understand the Hogan love by some here.
He's no world-beater. And we aren't at panic stations just yet.
A non-football advantage of having Buddy at the Dockers is that he might help balance out the tv coverage / column space / general media adulation associated with Nic Nat.
Hooker replaces Fletcher (and/or doesn't need to play every game). You can have Pears if you want him.
What do you mean replaces Fletcher? Is he injured?
Buddy is two tiers up on those blokes.How did you like the balanced coverage we got from Tarrant and Croad's presence?
. Again, a suitable trade came up and we might potentially entertain the idea. Something in the vicinity of a round 2 - 4 would do it IMO. 
So you reckon he's only got another ten years in him?In the future. Unfortunately I don't think Fletcher will be able to play until he's 97.
So you reckon he's only got another ten years in him?
That stuff they've been taking really works wonders on old players.
just read between the lines of one Hird's sms exchanges to Dank.
I like Pears. He's suffered a bit with injury but his first few years were very good. Has good disposal, perhaps a little small for the really tall forwards. Guys like him who are decent, and being squeezed out would be good to have a crack at.
If Frawley was out of contract I'd say have a go at him too. Bloke needs to get out of that shit hole.
Hogan is a beast marker and he moves really well for his size. I wish we actually could've got him.
That's the problem for me.
He's a "tweener". Not big enough, yet not small enough.
Wouldn't slash my wrists if we had a crack at him tough.
Hogan to me is still just a nice highlight reel.
Shocking kick, incredible pack mark from what ive seen,I would be so stoked if we could get hogan.
Just doesn't do enough apart from take a nice grab.