- Joined
- Oct 9, 2003
- Posts
- 15,667
- Reaction score
- 830
- Location
- Reebok Stadium
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Bolton,Clippers,Falcons,Mariners
Don't get me wrong I like Ryder but he was superfolous to our requirements when we were drafting in 2005 for all the reasons mentioned above.Broady Poker Tour said:I believe Gumbleton is more a CHB than a CHF but is versatile enough to play both. who knows, after we beat the Blues and avoid the spoon, we might end up with Gibbs instead. Assuming the Blues take a KPP
Either way, i think we Essendon supporters can be guilty of over-rating our own. I don't think Solly, Bradley or McPhee will ever be KPP's. Laycock is a ruckman not a forward, and hopefully Ryder will develop into an Adam Goodes type.
I think Lee might be the man who can fill Fletcher's boots when he retires in 2008.
We already have 3 ruckmen in Hille, Laycock and Cartledge
Our key forwards would have been Lloyd, Lucas, Johns
Our key backs were Fletcher, Bradley, Lee, Lucy
Thats a third of our list over 6'3
Floaters between back and forward are McPhee, Solomon.
Laycock could play forward, Bradley could go into the ruck if needs be.
Now we have an over abundance of talls and hit a draft with supposedly the greatest potential of key position players since its inception and conversely entering a period where the great teams (Adelaide, West Coast, Bulldogs, Melbourne) are dominated by runners.
Wallace saw the writing on the board and has been basically drafting pure running players for the past two seasons.
There's nothing we can do about what happened in the past but we can rectify the future.





