-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
King Rafa
- Thread starter Total Power
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
Forehand: Nadal
Top-spin Backhand: Federer
Slice Backhand: Federer
Serve: Federer
Volleys: Federer
Physical Conditioning: Nadal
Mental Edge: Nadal
Return of Serve: Can't give an answer for this one.
Top-spin Backhand: Federer
Slice Backhand: Federer
Serve: Federer
Volleys: Federer
Physical Conditioning: Nadal
Mental Edge: Nadal
Return of Serve: Can't give an answer for this one.
- Jul 11, 2007
- 10,821
- 83
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
I guess you could also include topspin forehand, flat forehand, then the subgroups of volleys, flat backhand, overhead smash, passing shots, subgroups of serves etc
- Thread starter
- #129
clutching the straws now i see! first you tried to prove that i am sad cause rafa is my idol.When i posted tiger woods comments you stopped picking on that.You have an issue with playing the man and not the ball.If you dont wish to debate then dont.I gave my opinon which you disagree with, fair enough.I couldnt care less about you think really.Federer is found out when faced with true competition! he has enjoyed his free run in the past against weak opponents, those days are over.He will go downhill from here and is capable of win 1 or 2 more slams only.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Not really. How long can I go on about it, everybody can see what you are about so it's a moot point.
Once again, don't put a spin on it. The average bigfooty poster who might skip past this might assume that you were actually debating. I was the one debating, you were going around on many tangents. It was debate rape. I think the sentence, "I almost feel sorry for you that you're getting such an arse reaming" was mentioned somewhere.
There is no doubt you care because you have been shown up and are trying to deflect.
Deflection. Never said he would, never said he wouldn't. Was never the point.
- Thread starter
- #131
everyone? just like everyone thought i was talking crap when i said rafa can play on all surfaces?
, its just an opinion, no need to get your panties in a knot according to you.But really i dont care waht you think, the fact is i mentioned federer is going downhill and will continue to go downhill is a fact.I predicted that a year ago and i went out on a leg for that statement.Yet again, bigfooty experts said i have no idea what am i talking about.Look i am not trying to deflect anything, what i am telling you is my opinion which you disagree with, its fair enough. You say federer is better than good, i say fed is just good.Time will tell.
Deflect what exactly>? i did show my reasons why i think federer is just good
are you naive or something?that is the point and thjats the reason why i said he is "just good", the main point of this debate.
Lloydy4Pope
Debutant
everyone? just like everyone thought i was talking crap when i said rafa can play on all surfaces?
according to you.But really i dont care waht you think, the fact is i mentioned federer is going downhill and will continue to go downhill is a fact.I predicted that a year ago and i went out on a leg for that statement.Yet again, bigfooty experts said i have no idea what am i talking about.Look i am not trying to deflect anything, what i am telling you is my opinion which you disagree with, its fair enough. You say federer is better than good, i say fed is just good.Time will tell.
Deflect what exactly>? i did show my reasons why i think federer is just good
that is the point and thjats the reason why i said he is "just good", the main point of this debate.
Time has told you moron - he has won 13 grand slams. A 'good' player would be Nicolay Davydenko - Federer is without a doubt a great player, regardless of what you think of him or Nadal.
matt_897
Premium Platinum
HAHA.... Only 13 Grand Slams, only just a good player.... Doesn't matter what the hell Nadal/Federer does for the rest of his career, Federer will be recognised as one of the greats and a great player
- Thread starter
- #134
well lets say federer is great in this century (so far), where tennis was weak.The upcoming generation is proving and will prove i am right.
Vdubs
Hall of Famer
Can I quote you on that?Fed can win 1or 2 more slams? For such a petty point scorer, you should have said zero. Any idea how hard it is to win one? Fed will not win another, but not because Nadal owns him, more because his time is up. He IS human and has new priorities, actually has a life outside of tennis, and because Nadal is fitter, meaner, hungrier, and at the peak of his powers. What Fed did against ALL players,all held him in the highest regard, was never to last forever, just like Brisbane Lions supremacy coming to an end. Nadal may be the greatest ever at his end, but up until now, Federer is the greatest player most of the world has seen. He only beat everybody available in the world to play, and is responsible for the emergence of Nadal, Djoko, Murray, and the way these guys have had to evolve to beat Federer.
Indeed and the trouble Nadal is already having with his joints illustrates the physical price the lad has had to pay and will have to pay for what will be his brief tenure at the top. In time we will see thatt he sheer exertion he had to go through to displace a declining Federer will have shortened his career at the top.
Fact! Indeed.
- Thread starter
- #138
- Thread starter
- #139
brief? haha he is guaranteed world number 1 ranking now atleast till canada
While your man defends more than 4,000 points till US open..goodluck with that 
brief? haha he is guaranteed world number 1 ranking now atleast till canada
It will be an interesting couple of months. Rafa should keep hes number 1 ranking to 2011 as he played terrible after the US Open. Hoping Rafa extends hes lead over Roger.
I like Roger but I prefer to watch Rafa. Rafa is exciting to watch, when I watch Roger play we all know whats going to happen to the opponent and I think thats boring. Rafa is the best thing thats been in tennis for five years. If there was no Rafa Roger would have won 25 grand slams and that would be so boring. We need healthy competition or no one would watch mens tennis.
- Aug 11, 2008
- 3,605
- 1,459
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Nadal more exciting than Federer? Seriously? Nadal is the tennis equivalent of the Sydney Swans in 2005/2006.
Nadal keeps winning somehow
It does not matter how you win asd long as you win!!! Federer serves ace. At Wimbledon I rather watching Rafa play. We all know Roger makes the final
- Thread starter
- #143
if you find federer exciting, you must have no excitement in your life. Seriously. Got nothing to do with his game though.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Federer's one of the most attractive players to watch with his shotmaking, so that could be seen as exciting to watch. But yes, cruising through early rounds is hardly exciting.
Depends on what you like and what you find exciting.
GS's don't get interesting until about the 4th round anyway. Any strange results prior to that are just 'wow' moments.
- Thread starter
- #146
lol!
Thrawn
Premium Platinum
brief? haha he is guaranteed world number 1 ranking now atleast till canada
You're a Disney villain.
YOTC
Brownlow Medallist
I'm on total powers side. Federer is a big baby. We love KING RAFA!
- Thread starter
- #149
- Thread starter
- #150
3,900 points ahead of federer now, game set and match for atleast 12 months
- Status