Gordon your response is typical of the teenager who resorts to using language such as "filth' to refer to people when they don't agree with another's opinion. Your anger and lack of intelligence is indicative of your "base" use of the English language to point score.
In relation to your comment that Walker took a similar mark to Krakouer's earlier this year, we are debating the merits of the three marks nominated for mark of the year, not any other random mark you wish to bring into the equation.
Finally if i answer "Krakouer as mark of the year in 2011" in some future trivia quiz i'll actually be correct.]
Dude, you're the one who came on our board telling one of our mod they are embarrassing themselves and at the same time arguing what the entire world has realised bar Filth fans and the haters/fairytale book writing selection panel. Yet you're calling what I said as teenage talk and questioning my intelligence?
First of all, on a footy forum in a team's board calling your biggest rivals "filth" astounds you does it? Teenage talk is it? What are you an 18th century scholar?
The fact that you fail to see the most obvious of occurrences tells me you're either not quite right, or you belong to some kind of secluded environment which restricts you from recognising reality.
It does amaze me how you're setting the rules. You are saying we can't consider any other mark taken this year because the same idiots said which 3 to pick from? Walker took a too similar mark to Krakouer's this year shows how common Krakouer's mark is and how next year we will see more of the same.
Using things like logic is not allowed is it? Sorry, I forgot you're setting the rules!
All you need to do is explain how one Mark could make world news and have 3 million views? Is it something basic is it? So common is it?
As my intelligence is restricted to a teenage level, please could you use your remarkable off-the-scale brain power to explain to me how Walker's mark could be so popular?
Thanks in advance