Society/Culture Kyle Rittenhouse

[ChappyUK]

Why do only the BLM deaths upset you?

Knew you wouldn't answer.

 

[Malifice]

They were not trying any such thing. Don't be so bloody naive.

You were the one that said they support it.

Dont look at me.

 

[sherb]

Exactly. The one being assaulted by the mob

And whose life hasn't been all milk and cookies since he killed two people because some people got upset with him.....for killing two people.

And it was all the fault of others, it had nothing to do with his choices, actions or behaviour.

I see where you are coming from. One of the true victims of our time is Kyle.....I mean "the victim".

 

[sherb]

Knew you wouldn't answer.

So why did you ask?

Wasted both of our time.

Do better next time around.

 

[Malifice]

I struggle to believe you

Unlike you, I dont deflect and wriggle out of shit, and Im not here to cheerlead for one side over another.

I dont think vigilantism should be lawful regardless of the political persuasion of the offender or victim, and in this case if KR thought the same, two people would still be alive, and he wouldnt be facing a possible sentence in prison.

You see mate, at least I'm consistent and not some cheerleader for one side or the other.

 

[RedVest4]

And whose life hasn't been all milk and cookies since he killed two people because some people got upset with him.....for killing two people.

And it was all the fault of others, it had nothing to do with his choices, actions or behaviour.

I see where you are coming from. One of the true victims of our time is Kyle.....I mean "the victim".

Defended himself when people attacked him.

If a woman was walking through the Bronx at night after a big night on the town and was chased by a group of men who were threatening to kill her and she pulled out a gun in self defense and shot an attacker just as they were grabbing at her is it her fault for being in the wrong place?

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

And whose life hasn't been all milk and cookies since he killed two people because some people got upset with him.....for killing two people.

And it was all the fault of others, it had nothing to do with his choices, actions or behaviour.

I see where you are coming from. One of the true victims of our time is Kyle.....I mean "the victim".

What, pray tell, were "your victims" doing there?

 

[sherb]

Defended himself when people attacked him.

If a woman was walking through the Bronx at night after a big night on the town and was chased by a group of men who were threatening to kill her and she pulled out a gun in self defense and shot an attacker just as they were grabbing at her is it her fault for being in the wrong place?

Was she playing vigilante, armed with an assault rifle?

 

[Malifice]

So you forfeit your right to self defence by open carry of a weapon in a volatile environment?

No you forfeit your right to self defence when you put yourself intentionally in harms way through an act of armed vigilantism. If it were any other way, then **** the rule of law, lets all just grab some guns and legalize dueling again.

Beats me what the laws are in the USA though.

 

[RedVest4]

Unlike you, I dont deflect and wriggle out of sh*t, and Im not here to cheerlead for one side over another.

I dont think vigilantism should be lawful regardless of the political persuasion of the offender or victim, and in this case if KR thought the same, two people would still be alive, and he wouldnt be facing a possible sentence in prison.

You see mate, at least I'm consistent and not some cheerleader for one side or the other.

Ive been consistent too in that i have said if the political ideology was reversed id still have no issue with the actions. Self defense is self defense. There was "vigilantism" going on from the rioters as much as anyone

Not sure what ive "wriggled out of"?

 

[ChappyUK]

So why did you ask?

Wasted both of our time.

Do better next time around.

Sorry for thinking you could be genuine. Why can't you answer the question?

 

[sherb]

What, pray tell, were "your victims" doing there?

There is only one victim here.

 

[The Passenger]

If a woman was walking through the Bronx at night after a big night on the town and was chased by a group of men who were threatening to kill her and she pulled out a gun in self defense and shot an attacker just as they were grabbing at her is it her fault for being in the wrong place?

I would love to know the depths of depravity one has to reach to find those as comparable situations.

 

[Malifice]

Ive been consistent too in that i have said if the political ideology was reversed id still have no issue with the actions. Self defense is self defense.

OK then leaving the politics out of it, at what point do you draw the line?

Should dueling (pistols at dawn) be legal?

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

You were the one that said they support it.

Dont look at me.

He was running towards the police. Very visible police. Heavily armed police. He was absolutely no threat to the skateboard guy. Why did the skateboard guy need to go all vigilante when there were cops just 100m up the road with multiple assault vehicles?

 

[RedVest4]

Was she playing vigilante, armed with an assault rifle?

She had a gun. Been made clear in the scenario above. Stop deflecting and answer the question

 

[Chief]

If a woman was walking through the Bronx at night after a big night

Stop trolling mate.

 

[ChappyUK]

No you forfeit your right to self defence when you put yourself intentionally in harms way through an act of armed vigilantism. If it were any other way, then fu** the rule of law, lets all just grab some guns and legalize dueling again.

Beats me what the laws are in the USA though.

If you don't know why argue like you do?

 

[Chief]

He was running towards the police. Very visible police. Heavily armed police. He was absolutely no threat to the skateboard guy. Why did the skateboard guy need to go all vigilante when there were cops just 100m up the road with multiple assault vehicles?

I thought the cops had all gone?

 

[RedVest4]

I would love to know the depths of depravity one has to reach to find those as comparable situations.

Two scenarios of self defense...not that large of a leap i would have thought

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

No you forfeit your right to self defence when you put yourself intentionally in harms way through an act of armed vigilantism. If it were any other way, then fu** the rule of law, lets all just grab some guns and legalize dueling again.

Beats me what the laws are in the USA though.

You need to read the laws in the US.

And by the way, if the police withdraw here like they did over there, then I'd reserve my right to defend my property and family with whatever gun I could find.

Again, it seems that you're pissed off that citizens fought back against the rioters. Why?

 

[RedVest4]

Stop trolling mate.

Genuine question. Seeing where you believe self defense is ok and where it isnt

 

[sherb]

Sorry for thinking you could be genuine. Why can't you answer the question?

Why did you ask if you knew I wasn't going to answer?

In any case, what on earth makes you think I didn't care about the dead in the BLM riots?

 

[RedVest4]

You need to read the laws in the US.

And by the way, if the police withdraw here like they did over there, then I'd reserve my right to defend my property and family with whatever gun I could find.

Again, it seems that you're pissed off that citizens fought back against the rioters. Why?

Coz the rioters (pedos, wife bashers and all) were the "good guys"

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

I thought the cops had all gone?

No. They were standing down. 100m down the road. Whilst rioters burned the place. It's all on video.

Why are you in this thread if you have no idea of the subject?