- Staff
- #751
Someone who attacked him.
Again someone who tried to disarm him.
How was Anthony supposed to know any of this, with the crowd screaming out that the kid with the rifle was an active shooter?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Someone who attacked him.
Again someone who tried to disarm him.
How was Anthony supposed to know any of this, with the crowd screaming out that the kid with the rifle was an active shooter?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The Rittenhouse defenders will defend the shooting of Blake too sadly.Watts in 1965, Detroit in 1967, Los Angeles in 1992, or Baltimore in 2015, Kenosha 2020. All stemming from police violence. The US really needs to start to address some of these issues otherwise it will never end. LA was particularly insane.
Just a skateboard swing.
Its my opinion. Im allowed one.
Also, seeing as you think its a pre-requisite to have knowledge of US laws to post here, and you know SFA about US laws, I presume (to be consistent) this will be the last we hear from you in this thread.
Unless you're a hypocrite of course.
He didn't know. That's the point. He chased down a bloke who was running towards the police and belted him, sorry, "made contact" with a skateboard.
So we agree on these facts:
1) All Anthony likely knew about Kyle was what the crowd were yelling (that there was an active shooter, and Kyle was likely the person)
2) Anthony moved his GF out of harms way and went towards Kyle
3) He attempted to disarm Kyle and hit him with his skateboard
4) Kyle then shot him in the chest with his rifle, killing him
Do you agree that those are the facts?
I'm only curious as to why this case, out of all the sh*t that happened last year. Has become such a racial and political lightening rod when it only involved white people.
So we agree on these facts:
...
3) He attempted to disarm Kyle and hit him with his skateboard
4) Kyle then shot him in the chest with his rifle, killing him
Do you agree that those are the facts?
No, I'm criticizing the over-reaction of the police. How many bullets in the back was it?You defending another rapist now? He was resisting arrest and had grabbed a knife.
No. And you are a lousy lawyer.
No, I'm criticizing the over-reaction of the police. How many bullets in the back was it?
Nice try at getting a reaction though.
Which of those facts dont you agree with then:
1) All Anthony likely knew about Kyle was what the crowd were yelling (that there was an active shooter, and Kyle was likely the person)
2) Anthony moved his GF out of harms way and went towards Kyle
3) He attempted to disarm Kyle and hit him with his skateboard
4) Kyle then shot him in the chest with his rifle, killing him
Presuming you can count above 3, I've even numbered them for you to make it easier to call out which one you disagree with.
Wouldn't the laws in the USA, Wisconsin in particular be relevant to this case?No you forfeit your right to self defence when you put yourself intentionally in harms way through an act of armed vigilantism. If it were any other way, then fu** the rule of law, lets all just grab some guns and legalize dueling again.
Beats me what the laws are in the USA though.
Deflect with an ad hom.
And yet, according to you, I was defending a rapist.The amount of shots cops unload always shocks me. But it seems to be consistent, so must be in their training or something.
Once the bad guy shows a weapon, it seems all bets are off.
But I won't be shedding tears for Blake.
1 and 4 are probably true. 2 and 3 probably not true.
I have tried till the point of frustration to discuss the case in what I feel is an objective manner.Ask all the usual RWNJ's flood on here to defend his actions as one.
Rather than have a discussion about the merits of what happened, or humanizing the victims its all 'ANTIFA and BLM' blabbering bullshit and typcial partisan trolling bullshit.
they shoot until the threat is neutralised. shooting once or twice and waiting to see how it goes is how cops get killed. also the real world isn't like a movie where one shot sends the bad guy flying through a plate glass window. in a highly charged and stressful situation the human body can do some crazy shit and absorb an insane about of damage and keep going... at least for a while.The amount of shots cops unload always shocks me. But it seems to be consistent, so must be in their training or something.
Once the bad guy shows a weapon, it seems all bets are off.
But I won't be shedding tears for Blake.
I have tried till the point of frustration to discuss the case in what I feel is an objective manner.
I don't think I have used the words Antifa or BLM at all in this thread.
Then again I don't consider myself a RWNJ either, so I'm going to assume you are not talking about me.