Society/Culture Kyle Rittenhouse

[Achy Blakey Heart]

Not terrorism if they don't actually do anything.

And we don't know whether they actually are "BLM" protesters - plenty of bots around to stir up trouble.

Where are the threats being communicated?

Wrong.

Terrorism
noun

the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.




Intimidation is exactly what's allegedly been occurring. If so....its terrorism.

It wont be reported in the MSM. Too divisive in the current tinderbox and you will be labelled racist forever.

 

[sherb]

Who asked him to come? Did he have any training? Any affiliation with an organised effort? Why bring a big gun?

I can answer that one. He's an insecure little boy who needed badly to feel like a man.

 

[Chief]

the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

What's the political aim?

 

[Chief]

None of that matters when it comes to self-defence.

I'm not talking about his guilt or otherwise in the murder case.

 

[Achy Blakey Heart]

Via which channel?

Did he have any training? Any affiliation with an organised effort? Why bring a big gun?

Why does it matter? The owner asked for help and people responded lawfully.

Not Sure- first aid- he was asking the rioters if anyone needed first aid. No. Ask Gaige Grosskreutz the same question?

 

[Malifice]

the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

What do you call the storming of the US Capital?

 

[Achy Blakey Heart]

What's the political aim?

You really think BLM, fringe left and associated rioters have no political aim.....wow.

 

[Achy Blakey Heart]

What do you call the storming of the US Capital?

Terrorism

 

[sherb]

None of that matters when it comes to self-defence. Of course youll never actually address was his firing of his gun done in self-defence, because you know the answer to that question doesnt support the left wing narrative.

But go ahead and try to make out Rittenhouse to be some villain. Its fun watching you lot deflect worse than a politician while beating the leftist drum.

And self-defence is irrelevant if the events don't occur in the first place.

And they don't occur if an ill-prepared little boy doesn't put himself in a situation he has no place to be in.

Hence Chief's questions, which you yourself deflected.

 

[Malifice]

Terrorism

And the orange bloke that told them from his lecturn and twitter account to go down there and 'fight' and organised and encouraged the whole thing?

What's he then?

 

[Chief]

Why does it matter? The owner asked for help and people responded lawfully.

And in Kyle's case, two people died.

Any other helpers get chased? Shoot people?

Remember he was, what, 15? He took an AR down to what seemed to have been called a war zone by the news feeds he was watching.

And people died because of that.

 

[Achy Blakey Heart]

And the orange bloke that told them from his lecturn and twitter account to go down there and 'fight' and organised and encouraged the whole thing?

What's he then?

A complete knob. Like Biden. Like Andrews. Like Scomo. Like Anastacia.

Mate come on. Stop the look over there bullshit. Just be objective. Drop your bias.

 

[Chief]

A complete knob.

Not a terrorist then?

 

[Achy Blakey Heart]

And in Kyle's case, two people died.

Any other helpers get chased? Shoot people?

Remember he was, what, 15? He took an AR down to what seemed to have been called a war zone by the news feeds he was watching.

And people died because of that.

You haven't watched any of the evidence have you. Stop getting all your outrage from MSM and FB. FFS

 

[Achy Blakey Heart]

Not a terrorist then?

Possibly. But I would put a number of politicians and activist groups in the same boat. Antifa and proud boys for one.

 

[Malifice]

I'm interested as to why you don't like it?

Because people are dead because some kid decided to be a tacticool ******* and arm himself and head down to a riot.

If we're just saying any kid can grab a rifle and head down to a protest or riot and shoot someone, where does that leave us?

Next protest, it becomes a free for all. Protesters (on both sides) will be bringing rifles and we've basically just OK'd vigilantism and literal armed insurgency on the streets.

 

[Malifice]

A complete knob. Like Biden. Like Andrews. Like Scomo. Like Anastacia.

Mate come on. Stop the look over there bullshit. Just be objective. Drop your bias.

If what his followers (at his urging) did was terrorism, how is he different to Bin Laden or the ISIS knobs?

 

[Achy Blakey Heart]

If what his followers (at his urging) did was terrorism, how is he different to Bin Laden or the ISIS knobs?

Politicians of both persuasions dog whistle groups regularly. But no doubt you think there is one good side here and one bad side in everything. how small minded.

 

[EDFL follower]

And in Kyle's case, two people died.

Any other helpers get chased? Shoot people?

Remember he was, what, 15? He took an AR down to what seemed to have been called a war zone by the news feeds he was watching.

And people died because of that.

People died because they were stupid

 

[Osho]

And in Kyle's case, two people died.

Any other helpers get chased? Shoot people?

Remember he was, what, 15? He took an AR down to what seemed to have been called a war zone by the news feeds he was watching.

And people died because of that.

17 at the time I believe.

 

[Gough]

Because people are dead because some kid decided to be a tacticool ******* and arm himself and head down to a riot.

If we're just saying any kid can grab a rifle and head down to a protest or riot and shoot someone, where does that leave us?

Next protest, it becomes a free for all. Protesters (on both sides) will be bringing rifles and we've basically just OK'd vigilantism and literal armed insurgency on the streets.

It's just another example of the imbalance in the American justice system which wouldn't be so bad if the ball broke the way of the black dude in possesion of a crack pipe and enough weed for a couple of joints occasionally.

 

[Balls In]

At this point I'm more interested in unpacking the motivations of those trying to hang Rittenhouse for what is an open and shut self defense case. Remember there were over 30 murders committed during those rolling riots.

- Is it about the second amendment ie "you shouldn't have a gun under any circumstances even to save your own life or as a deterent to protect property" ie- If you use a gun you should go to jail no matter what preceded the shootings?
- Do people genuinely think these riots were/are a necessary part of healing race relations in the US and therefore any push back against the rioters is therefore racist?
- Is it just sceptism. You don't believe Rittenhouse was there to clear graffiti, put out fires or guard a car yard. He was a racist Trump supporter there to take the law into his own hands and kill rioters?
- Other

 

[Achy Blakey Heart]

At this point I'm more interested in unpacking the motivations of those trying to hang Rittenhouse for what is an open and shut self defense case. Remember there were over 30 murders committed during those rolling riots.

- Is it about the second amendment ie "you shouldn't have a gun under any circumstances even to save your own life or as a deterent to protect property". If you use a gun you should go to jail no matter what preceded the shootings?
- Do people genuinely think these riots were/are a necessary part of healing race relations in the US and therefore any push back against the rioters is therefore racist?
- Is it just sceptism. You don't believe Rittenhouse was there to clear graffiti, put out fires or guard a car yard. He was a racist Trump supporter there to take the law into his own hands and kill rioters?
- Other

You wont get a sensible answer to this i'm sorry mate.

 

[Malifice]

Politicians of both persuasions dog whistle groups regularly. But no doubt you think there is one good side here and one bad side in everything. how small minded.

Dont change the topic. You literally just conceded that the President of the USA incited and encouraged an act of literal terrorism against the USA in an effort to overturn an election in which he lost.

Yeah there are good and bad on both sides, but it doesnt get much worse than that now does it?

 

[sherb]

Politicians of both persuasions dog whistle groups regularly. But no doubt you think there is one good side here and one bad side in everything. how small minded.

How many politicians in first-world countries refuse to accept defeat in an election that they lost (instead inventing non-existent voter fraud) and, as part of doing so, incite an insurrection/riot against their own country and government institution?