- Joined
- Sep 21, 2004
- Posts
- 47,693
- Reaction score
- 55,444
- AFL Club
- GWS
Who's doing that?
It’s where this inside the juror room stuff is coming from.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Who's doing that?
The campaigner murdered 2 people.
No he didn't or else he would know the main charges are reckless and intentional homicide, reckless homicide and attempted reckless homicide.Murdered? You followed every minute of the trial while ignoring all media discussing the trial?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
wtf are you talking about? guns in the streets on both sides was EXTREMELY common during the unrest in the US last year.Because people are dead because some kid decided to be a tacticool ******* and arm himself and head down to a riot.
If we're just saying any kid can grab a rifle and head down to a protest or riot and shoot someone, where does that leave us?
Next protest, it becomes a free for all. Protesters (on both sides) will be bringing rifles and we've basically just OK'd vigilantism and literal armed insurgency on the streets.
Im not ignoring sh*t. You just cant read.
Again I dont support a scenario where anyone can just grab a gun and head down to a rally or riot.
I dont care about (and expressly didnt mention) the political leanings of the person with the gun.
You’ve repeatedly questioned why he was there. As though it wasn’t his business. It was.Point to where I said that.
Yep.Yes, that held back piece of evidence was extremely odd, and a serious breach, I was wondering why it wssn't highlighted/punished more at the time. Can the Judge revert back to that point though after the jury decision?
I questioned why HE was there. It was not his business to be on the street with a gun in the middle of civil unrest.You’ve repeatedly questioned why he was there. As though it wasn’t his business. It was.
The people who've honest to dog been watching the whole trial and coincidentally all come to exactly the same conclusion suggested it was all coming from one place.Some of you are using Jack Posobiec as a source. fu** me dead.
No wonder you all go coy when asked for a source.
Equality at it's finestBecause your contribution was a Trumpy droning background noise that contributed nothing*.
* Apart from some trashy memes.
Are you aware that of the 3 people shot, only the racist pedo was a local? What were the others doing there?I questioned why HE was there. It was not his business to be on the street with a gun in the middle of civil unrest.
I also think that protection of property is not worth a person's life.
Something the police GENERALLY agree with. Possibly why they had backed off. The people trained to use guns on other people had taken their guns and gone 100 metres up the street.
How many rioters and looters were charged? How many found guilty? How many got prison sentences?
wtf are you talking about? guns in the streets on both sides was EXTREMELY common during the unrest in the US last year.
Are you aware that is irrelevant to what I’m saying?
So many arguments in favour of Rittenhouse are “but those other people…”.
All of the arguments you apply to Rittenhouse equally apply to the others. Except they were destroying property. They were attacking him. He was saving property. And he was defending himself.
Are you allowed to defend your property and that of your friends and family? Yes or no?
I'm not sure that cancels out the AR-15.and a fire extinguisher
View attachment 1282158
… they aren’t the ones who shot someone and about whom this thread is. About.All of the arguments you apply to Rittenhouse equally apply to the others. Except
… they aren’t the ones who shot someone and about whom this thread is. About.
Of course people shouldn’t have been burning sh*t.
That’s what we call “a given”. That’s not part of the discussion. It’s an agreed point. Do you get it?