Society/Culture Kyle Rittenhouse

[Taylor]

So you would have supported ANITFA vigilantes going into the Capitol situation, a la Kyle?

Sure, the overwhelming majority of gun owners are responsible people. There have been plenty of examples where right wing and left wing people, both armed, express their opinions without exchanging violence.

 

[RedVest4]

How do you disarm without assaulting??

The little sh*t got himself in trouble and killed people to get out of it.

Got himself in trouble by putting out a fire in front of a bunch of nutcases who wanted to kill him for it

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Rubbish. The rest was irrelevant to my question.

The kill bit was pretty relevant. Now get busy deleting. Malifice and Sherb are out of control!!

 

[Taylor]

Got himself in trouble by putting out a fire in front of a bunch of nutcases who wanted to kill him for it

It was street art, jeez, that's such a racist thing to not know that.

 

[Malifice]

They were not trying to disarm him. They were trying to assault (probably kill) him.

There was no evidence of that other than some dude swinging a skateboard at him. Both dead victims were grabbing for his rifle.

There is zero evidence either was trying to do anything other than disarm him (barring the skateboard swing).

 

[Taylor]

The kill bit was pretty relevant. Now get busy deleting. Malifice and Sherb are out of control!!

This is the goal. We need to get those interaction numbers up so we meet our mod bonuses.

 

[sherb]

Pretty sure you will find there was plenty of ANTIFA "counter protesters" on Jan 6 and surrounds

Look, I know you only support vigilantism when it's the Kyles of the world who undertake it, in line with your political leanings, I was just hoping you might admit it.

All good.

 

[Taylor]

There was no evidence of that other than some dude swinging a skateboard at him. Both dead victims were grabbing for his rifle.

There is zero evidence either was trying to do anything other than disarm him (barring the skateboard swing).

...and chasing him with the chain.. and pointing the gun at his head...

 

[RedVest4]

Then why the fu** bring it up in the first place?



1) It wasnt an AK.

2) So your argument is, it should be legal for a gunman to shoot someone dead... who is trying to disarm the gunman?

Like... you're saying if you saw some crazed dude with a mean beard in the CBD waving ISIS' black flag of Jihad and screaming something that sounds like 'Admiral Akbar', while holding an AK-47, that this individual should be well within his legal rights to shoot you dead on the spot if you tried to disarm him, and that your killing should be legal?

Or even if you just saw some random fat nerdy 17 year kid with an AR-15 in the CBD... he's within his rights tp blow you away if you attempted to disarm him?

That's your argument here?

Its not illegal to open carry in Wisconsin. Thats the first thing you need to get your head around. Secondly thankfully he did have his gun as it saved his life.

 

[Chief]

Got himself in trouble by putting out a fire in front of a bunch of nutcases who wanted to kill him for it

By going into a chaotic area with a bloody assault rifle. Obviously.

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

...and chasing him with the chain.. and pointing the gun at his head...

“Zero evidence….”

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

By going into a chaotic area with a bloody assault rifle. Obviously.

Why was it chaotic?

 

[Chief]

...and chasing him with the chain.. and pointing the gun at his head...

Why did he not drop the gun? Surely the victims were well within their rights to act as security? SURELY???

 

[sherb]

By going into a chaotic area with a bloody assault rifle. Obviously.

But how else was he going to feel like a man?

 

[Chief]

Why was it chaotic?

That is not relevant to his actions. That’s whinging that the other kids were doing it, too.

 

[RedVest4]

Look, I know you only support vigilantism when it's the Kyles of the world who undertake it, in line with your political leanings, I was just hoping you might admit it.

All good.

Can you not read? Ive repeatedly stated if the political leanings of the individuals were different the end result would be the same (acquitted) based on the facts remaining identical

 

[ChappyUK]

Obvious clickbait is obvious.

 

[RedVest4]

By going into a chaotic area with a bloody assault rifle. Obviously.

So youd want him to go there without an assault rifle and end up dead like the 30 or so others the BLM rioters murdered? Or just let them destroy whatever they want? Whats your argument here?

 

[sherb]

Can you not read? Ive repeatedly stated if the political leanings of the individuals were different the end result would be the same (acquitted) based on the facts remaining identical

That doesn't answer my question. That's dodging it.

But all good, I know the answer, as I said.

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

There was no evidence of that other than some dude swinging a skateboard at him. Both dead victims were grabbing for his rifle.

There is zero evidence either was trying to do anything other than disarm him (barring the skateboard swing).

Just a skateboard swing.

 

[Chief]

So youd want him to go there without an assault rifle

No. I’d want him to stay away as he had no training or support to do whatever it is he was trying to do. None. Do you understand?

 

[RedVest4]

That doesn't answer my question. That's dodging it.

But all good, I know the answer, as I said.

It couldnt be answering it any clearer

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

That is not relevant to his actions. That’s whinging that the other kids were doing it, too.

It is relevant because he was defending property. Or is that banned now too?

 

[RedVest4]

No. I’d want him to stay away as he had no training or support to do whatever it is he was trying to do. None. Do you understand?

So just let them burn the community down?

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

No. I’d want him to stay away as he had no training or support to do whatever it is he was trying to do. None. Do you understand?

The trained people had retreated.