Remove this Banner Ad

Society/Culture Kyle Rittenhouse

  • Thread starter Thread starter RedVest4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Murdered? You followed every minute of the trial while ignoring all media discussing the trial?
No he didn't or else he would know the main charges are reckless and intentional homicide, reckless homicide and attempted reckless homicide.
But to be fair I am being a bit of a smart arse as it means the same thing as murder in other places.

Source for the Soft Downhill Skier:


Is that ok SDS? It is a week old and some things have changed (gun charge dismissed etc). Is worth a read though.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Because people are dead because some kid decided to be a tacticool ******* and arm himself and head down to a riot.

If we're just saying any kid can grab a rifle and head down to a protest or riot and shoot someone, where does that leave us?

Next protest, it becomes a free for all. Protesters (on both sides) will be bringing rifles and we've basically just OK'd vigilantism and literal armed insurgency on the streets.
wtf are you talking about? guns in the streets on both sides was EXTREMELY common during the unrest in the US last year.
 
Im not ignoring sh*t. You just cant read.

Again I dont support a scenario where anyone can just grab a gun and head down to a rally or riot.

I dont care about (and expressly didnt mention) the political leanings of the person with the gun.

How many rioters and looters were charged? How many found guilty? How many got prison sentences?
 
You’ve repeatedly questioned why he was there. As though it wasn’t his business. It was.
I questioned why HE was there. It was not his business to be on the street with a gun in the middle of civil unrest.

I also think that protection of property is not worth a person's life.

Something the police GENERALLY agree with. Possibly why they had backed off. The people trained to use guns on other people had taken their guns and gone 100 metres up the street.
 
Some of you are using Jack Posobiec as a source. fu** me dead.

No wonder you all go coy when asked for a source.
The people who've honest to dog been watching the whole trial and coincidentally all come to exactly the same conclusion suggested it was all coming from one place.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I questioned why HE was there. It was not his business to be on the street with a gun in the middle of civil unrest.

I also think that protection of property is not worth a person's life.

Something the police GENERALLY agree with. Possibly why they had backed off. The people trained to use guns on other people had taken their guns and gone 100 metres up the street.
Are you aware that of the 3 people shot, only the racist pedo was a local? What were the others doing there?

A militia had been formed because they felt that the local police couldn’t protect them. Many of the local police were grateful.

Shits complicated in life, Chief. I know it seems simple to you but it’s not. 17yo Bruce would have done the same if he had the courage.
 
Are you aware that of the 3 people shot, only the racist pedo was a local? What were the others doing there?
Are you aware that is irrelevant to what I’m saying?

So many arguments in favour of Rittenhouse are “but those other people…”.
 
It’s lucky for him he had it
Without it he might have lost a couple of teeth. With it, people died.

Think about it Vesty.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Are you aware that is irrelevant to what I’m saying?

So many arguments in favour of Rittenhouse are “but those other people…”.

All of the arguments you apply to Rittenhouse equally apply to the others. Except they were destroying property. They were attacking him. He was saving property. And he was defending himself.

Are you allowed to defend your property and that of your friends and family? Yes or no?
 
All of the arguments you apply to Rittenhouse equally apply to the others. Except they were destroying property. They were attacking him. He was saving property. And he was defending himself.

Are you allowed to defend your property and that of your friends and family? Yes or no?

It's not a yes or no question.
 
How the **** is them destroying property relevant? You’re trying to turn him into a hero. It’s pathetic.

Unless you’re bestowing on right wing militia the right to enforce the law with guns…which some of you would…it’s irrelevant.

You’re claiming self defence. From a guy with a plastic bag and a skateboard.

The only clear cut example of self defense was the 3rd guy. He should have put Rittenhouse down but didn’t. And was shot anyway.
 
All of the arguments you apply to Rittenhouse equally apply to the others. Except
… they aren’t the ones who shot someone and about whom this thread is. About.

Of course people shouldn’t have been burning shit.

That’s what we call “a given”. That’s not part of the discussion. It’s an agreed point. Do you get it?
 
… they aren’t the ones who shot someone and about whom this thread is. About.

Of course people shouldn’t have been burning sh*t.

That’s what we call “a given”. That’s not part of the discussion. It’s an agreed point. Do you get it?

It’s relevant if this self defense thing is convenient, and you see this twerp as being a hero.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom