Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Steve Price looks ancient.Looks like age hasn't been kind to Statler & Waldorf
And herein lies the entire Sky News model - some idiot states something/anything - Sky report it as actual news.So are you guys still believing this OBVIOUS load of sh*t “story”?
The rumour started from Peter Gleeson on 4BC talkback radio. Yes, the same Peter Gleeson who had to leave his Newscorp media roles because he was blatantly plagiarising other journo’s articles:
Peter Gleeson leaves News Corp’s Courier-Mail and Sky News after multiple instances of plagiarism
In one case the Courier-Mail columnist and Sky News presenter filled almost half a column with the unattributed reporting of a regional ABC journalistwww.theguardian.com
Now what was Gleeson’s “evidence” (from news.Com)?:
4BC radio host and veteran journalist Peter Gleeson claimed that “my sources are telling me that the Palaszczuk government is working behind the scenes” on the change, adding there were “also suggestions that streets such as George Street, Queen Street, Anne Street, Edward Street might be renamed, and we may even see the statue of George V outside City Hall removed”.
“My sources”…..
So BS.
Obvious what’s going on. After K’Gari was renamed (read up about the liar and swindler Eliza Fraser, whom it was renamed after, who’s lies led to massacres against the indigenous population of K’Gari) right wingers know they can capitalise and fear monger about EVERYTHING being renamed. Fits in with the anti-Voice campaign. Gets Hanson riled up and on a tirade again.
Gleeson was put back into media because he’s like Tucker Carlson. He lies to give his audience the story they want to hear.
But we should be smarter than to fall for such nonsense. Even though Palaszcuk flat out denied it 4BC still have the “Labor planning on renaming Brisbane” story headline up.
It looks like no one in this thread has?So are you guys still believing this OBVIOUS load of sh*t “story”?
It looks like no one in this thread has?
That doesn't mean anyone took the story seriously.From post 1 to post 18 only really post #7 questioned the validity of the story. Several comments said they support or are neutral on renaming Brisbane.
This is a great example of Murdoch shitf*ckery. You’ll have people on the left coming out saying renaming Brisbane is a good thing even though Palaszcuk never contemplated doing this.
It’s manufactured culture war nonsense against an ALP Premier on a day when a Liberal Premier has been confirmed to be corrupt.
Chris Kenny is a horrific cntWhy, because Chris Kenny said so? I'll believe it when I see someone reputable announcing it.