Remove this Banner Ad

Lachie Hansen vs Jack Watts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brad Roo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dont no what all this jack watts hate is his going to be very good player.

Also i use to not think much of jack watts as he hadnt played a game and everyone was jizzing in their pants but since that has changed.
 
For a bloke who's almost 22, was drafted back in 2006 and has played almost 50 games you would have hoped he'd have come on a little more.

His kicking last night was a disgrace. He has potato written all over him.
 
For a bloke who's almost 22, was drafted back in 2006 and has played almost 50 games you would have hoped he'd have come on a little more.

His kicking last night was a disgrace. He has potato written all over him.

Lol why?

He's good. Would slot in nicely at Melbourne atm
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

His very average..plays 1 half decent game that he should be turning out every week and North fans act like he is Carey mark II.


Fairly harsh, second game at CHF, he still had 5 shots on goal on Friday night.

His kicking was average, which has been a strength this year.


Although it's pointless really, North have shown this year they are a far better young side than either of Richmond or Melbourne, and most in this thread don't rate any of our players :o
 
His very average..plays 1 half decent game that he should be turning out every week and North fans act like he is Carey mark II.

One half decent game? The bloke was killing it at CHB before moving to the forward line.

You have NFI.
 
Hansen is a better footballer than Jack Reiwoldt.

By a comfortable margin.

In a half decent side Jack Reiwoldt would be the 2nd or 3rd key forward and getting 10-30% of the feed.

No side will ever win a premiership with Jack Reiwoldt as its leading goal kicker.

Bookmark that.

That is only your opinion, and you are an incredibly poor judge.

I find solace in the fact that you are a shocking judge of footballers.

Really, really poor.

:D Nice work Brad.
 
Yep, 4 out of 4.:thumbsu:

Hansen would kick 15 goals a quarter on Eric McKenzie.
 
His very average..plays 1 half decent game that he should be turning out every week and North fans act like he is Carey mark II.

Played decoy for Thomas in the first half and I have no problems with that. Then stayed at home in the second half, took some nice grabs and had 5 shots on goal. However, 0.2 is a shocking return for 5 shots and he has now kicked 2.5 from 10 shots on goal in his last 2 matches. Nowhere near good enough for a bloke that Brad Scott claims never misses at training.

I'll just put it down to a confidence thing from playing a new position. He will clunk 10 marks and bag 5 goals very soon and then he will be off and running.
 
Played decoy for Thomas in the first half and I have no problems with that. Then stayed at home in the second half, took some nice grabs and had 5 shots on goal. However, 0.2 is a shocking return for 5 shots and he has now kicked 2.5 from 10 shots on goal in his last 2 matches. Nowhere near good enough for a bloke that Brad Scott claims never misses at training.

I'll just put it down to a confidence thing from playing a new position. He will clunk 10 marks and bag 5 goals very soon and then he will be off and running.

For someone accusing Riewoldt of only ever being a 2nd or 3rd tall forward but Hansen being a number 1 power forward how can you be happy with him playing foil to Thomas? Unless he isn't all that?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Oh no....FAIL

I cannot believe you are still trying to argue that Hansen is better...you have got to be ******ed!

Did Richmond win the flag?
 
firstly, why are norths supporters backing brad roo?? Riewoldt is a heap better than Hansen as a KPF and even if we were comparing them too their respective positions JR = CHF and LH = CHB, Riewoldt would still be better.... as shown by him LEADING THE COLEMAN MEDAL

secondly, north fans have to get over this idea that they are 'younger' than melbourne and richmond

out of everyone who has played at least one game for the teams currently on their list
north = 23.4 yrs (34 players)
melb = 22.6 years (42 players) ... thats almost a years difference
rich = 23.3 years (39 players) almost no difference but you're NOT YOUNGER

as for the lachie hansen and jack watts comparison, seriously BradRoo???
Watts = born 91'
Hansen = born 88'

Watts = CHF/FF
Hansen = CHB/FB (i dont care that he has played part of one or two games up forward for you)

different positions
and btw hansens set shot is terrible... was that two out on the full from set shots friday night?? at least watts can kick straight lol
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Darwin Roo we didn't win the premiership I am just astounded that North supporters show ridiculous bias saying Hansen is better than Riewoldt.

Brad Roo you are right he won't play on WC defenders every week however..

he kicked 4 agains the hawks

6 on Dustin Fletcher and Tayte Peares against the dons

4 against Port in the rain

6 against the Saints

and finally 10 today.

Hansen kicks 2 last week and you are comparing....kiddng yourself!

The kid is leading the coleman champ in the bottom side. You can pretend Hansen is going to come good in your own mind but the fact is Riewoldt is averaging 6 per game over the last 5 weeks, kicked 10 goals today, which isn't something your average joe pulls out and is leading the Coleman.

Watts who the original comparison was for is 3 years younger and a ridiculous comparison.
 
Hansen kicks 2 last week and you are comparing....kiddng yourself!

You are the one that hijacked this thread with your Reiwoldt crap in the first place.

I would never have bought up the comparison, there isn't one.

One is a future elite KPP and the other is a good blue collar second stringer.
 
secondly, north fans have to get over this idea that they are 'younger' than melbourne and richmond

out of everyone who has played at least one game for the teams currently on their list
north = 23.4 yrs (34 players)
melb = 22.6 years (42 players) ... thats almost a years difference
rich = 23.3 years (39 players) almost no difference but you're NOT YOUNGER

So now you want to go bringing blokes in to the equation that aren't playing? Hilarious.

The North side that beat Melbourne was younger.

THAT is all that matters.
 
So now you want to go bringing blokes in to the equation that aren't playing? Hilarious.

The North side that beat Melbourne was younger.

THAT is all that matters.

Why is there so much emphasis on half a year or whatever it was?

Reality is it isn't like we have an average age of 25. I'd imagine our team will be younger again next year considering we'll lose one or both of Bruce/McDonald.
 
Take out Rawlings and Harvey and our average age is 12.
Aww diddums. Getting in a huff for being shown up as a duffa?

If you mean on the 'Premiership Clock' whereby average age of 25 is closer to a grand final then you probably are about 12. I expect you'll have to turn that list over thrice to rid it of spudness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom