Just google 30 FBI mandaley and there is abit there.
Conspiracy Theory Las Vegas Shooting
- Thread starter Exe Gesis
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Feb 24, 2013
- 45,365
- 37,740
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man Utd Green Bay Melb Storm
- Banned
- #477
Well given this was a FEMA/F.B.I terrorist rehearsal trial-run, right from the get-go, that's hardly surprising.
A bit like FEMA all being there on ground zero, in New York, immediately following 9/11, on the day.
Is anyone really surprised by this s**t-show anymore?....As Assange noted, immediately following the Las Vegas 'incident'....Domestic terrorism is the F.B.I's business model plan for enabling greater funding for itself of the U.S public purse.
Most, if not all terrorism on U.S shores is directly the result of the fully corrupted & complicit F.B.I....Which is part of the elite establishment nexus to control the population & keep it in fear.
Rocket-science it aint.
chefmeister
Big Footy’s Best Dressed Cat
- Banned
- #478
So what about this shooting at a Baptist church in Texas?
Do you reckon the FBI conjured another false flag there..?
Absolutely, all organised by the CIA. All people dead there were actors!
chefmeister
Big Footy’s Best Dressed Cat
- Banned
- #480
Are you sure it even actually took place tho..?
Where’s the CCTV footage? Otherwise it didn’t happen.
I am telling ya m8, it didn't happen, all a CIA plot with eventually leads to Mossad. The guy who was acting as the shooter is well and alive and now in Saudi Arabia with a lifetime free supply of KFCAre you sure it even actually took place tho..?
Where’s the CCTV footage? Otherwise it didn’t happen.
Could well be nothing, but interesting none the less. Im still not sure how this whole thing sits with me in terms of how much of what the media say actually happened but there is defintiely more to this than whats been reported. The fact that we are still yet to see any video footage of Paddock entering/exiting the hotel is a big sign that something is fishy, otherwise why not just release the footage of him carrying all the weapons up to his room ?
edit: after watching again it seems that the guy in the white isnt even with the cops but just soe random persons walking behind them as he veers off to the right at the end when the cops keep walking straight down the hall. Nothing to see here people.
- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,858
- 56,844
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Moderator
- #483
The telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...-Alwaleed-bin-Talal-in-Four-Seasons-deal.html
quote:
Bill Gates and Prince Alwaleed bin Talal in Four Seasons deal
quote:
Bill Gates is going into the hotel business. The Microsoft chairman has joined with Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal to back a management buy out of the luxury hotel group Four Seasons for $3.8bn (£1.95bn).
This is the Saudi that's just been arrested for corruption. Four Seasons is Mandalay Bay.
quote:
Bill Gates and Prince Alwaleed bin Talal in Four Seasons deal
quote:
Bill Gates is going into the hotel business. The Microsoft chairman has joined with Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal to back a management buy out of the luxury hotel group Four Seasons for $3.8bn (£1.95bn).
This is the Saudi that's just been arrested for corruption. Four Seasons is Mandalay Bay.
Put 2 and 2 together you get ?
BustedWing
Premiership Player
- Aug 29, 2013
- 3,091
- 2,038
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,858
- 56,844
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Moderator
- #486
Just saying, there's probably a calculator on your keyboard somewhere if you need it.
chefmeister
Big Footy’s Best Dressed Cat
- Banned
- #487
It is fair to point out that this news article is over 10 years old.
chefmeister
Big Footy’s Best Dressed Cat
- Banned
- #489
- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,858
- 56,844
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Moderator
- #490
Is it fair to point out that putting 2 and 2 together does not equal 3 and you must read the last line to get the point? But to be fair, this is the conspiracy board and a little lateral thinking might be required.
- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,858
- 56,844
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Moderator
- #491
Says the guy presenting as an alien with totally unrealistic boobies on his profile pic.
Last edited:
chefmeister
Big Footy’s Best Dressed Cat
- Banned
- #492
You should investigate why Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal and others were arrested in Saudi Arabia. Things may not appear as they seem.
- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,858
- 56,844
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Moderator
- #494
- May 28, 2016
- 17,523
- 26,982
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Banned
- #495
Shill.
I'd rather be a shill, than a dill.
- Jul 2, 2013
- 3,272
- 11,119
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
No, the effort was to clearly show evidence that you are embellishing the truth to suit your argument.
Evidence that any poster here can clearly see ... if they do the research!
What the heck?
You say I'm making claims with zero stats or data AND producing data and/or stats ...
Dude, you can't have it both ways ... oh, hang on, you can can't you. You get to set the rules around here. You are the Lord of Truth.
10 pages becomes 100 pages of nonsense.
Right Lord of Truth, it appears you enjoy sitting in your throne and determining what the rules are.
Is everything you disagree with extraordinary? Anything you do agree with, does not require references? ... Possible double standards here.
Just because you say something is important to you and your minions, does not make it a requirement for everybody.
Have I actually made any derogartory remarks against you?
I don't think I have (if I have, they would have been very tame) and that would be because you have mostly stayed away from making them towards me. Again, I'll give as good as I get. So if you want me to stop any name calling or personal attacks, best you tell your possie of followers to stop it first.
Again, your rules and your double standards.
What evidence? You think that a man with low IQ, amateur firearm skills, shooting from the hip, from his non preferred side, can make 16 head/neck shots in 15 seconds ... just because some of the victims were less than 2 or 3 metres away. Have you actually grabbed a toy or something and tried to simulate doing this yourself? I have and I can't do anything close to that. An expert in this field states he can't and yet that means nothing to you because it doesn't fit your argument.
'just more nonsense.
Oh my God. Do you actually listen to yourself?
So now anybody who disagrees with you, even Brigadiers (awarded with OBE's) are nutjobs.
Wow! Need I say more.
BustedWing
Premiership Player
- Aug 29, 2013
- 3,091
- 2,038
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Oh dear...
All i have ever asked for is for you to back up your bullshit.
Thats right! Sometimes you throw something out there with zero stats or data, and then other times (when pressed) you throw out a stat or data point, but neglect to reference where its come from.
Neither of those avenues is providing evidence for your position.
For the umpteenth time.
References. Citations. Evidence.
You literally just did in this very post!
Really...do I really have to post them again?
Really????
The government orchestrating a conspiracy to kill its own citizens?? Yeah, id say that's pretty extraordinary. You don't??
Not the point we are discussing, but we can once you concede the expert marksmanship issue we ARE discussing (in the relevant thread of course).
Its now obvious this is correct, and not a disqualifier from his deeds.
How many of these 16 head/neck shots were within 2-3 metres? How many were from even closer range than that? How many happened with Bryant literally having the gun muzzle pressed against the victim? The answers have now been provided to you multiple times. What you have just said is incredibly misleading. You know it. I know it.
How many times must I ask the question of you before you answer it?
You're dancing...its embarrassing.
You're truly kidding now, arent you??
Thats the thing! He's not an expert in this field. He is a war veteran. A decorated one, absolutely. But he is not a criminologist, nor is he a crime scene specialist, nor a member of the police force.
Besides, if you want to go down the route of lining up experts in their field that either support of dispute the official story...who might win that arms race do you think?
It means nothing to me because his opinion does not match the facts of the case.
It also means nothing to me because that is the RATIONAL way to decuce an arguments credibility or otherwise:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
An argument from authority, also called an appeal to authority, or the argumentum ad verecundiam[note 1], is a form of defeasible[4] argument in which a claimed authority's support is used as evidence for an argument's conclusion. It is well known as a fallacy, though it is used in a cogent form when all sides of a discussion agree on the reliability of the authority in the given context.[5][6]
No, not anyone who disagrees with me, just people who dont pay any attention to the facts. Facts will always trump peoples professions and experience.
Again, I ask you....
What about shooting people from point blank range in a small crowded cafe was "expert" to you?
Dont tell me you havent read the account provided to you.
Dont tell me you havent admitted the head/neck shot accuracy you claim as proof of your conspiracy didnt occur almost EXCLUSIVELY in said cafe.
Last edited:
That’s easy! Shootings that took place when the Republican Party was in office.
Where does this "firing from the hip" thing come from? Bryant had an AR-15 (or equivalent). Not a Tommy Gun. He might not have been taking sight pictures every shot, but I don't think the description means what a lot of people think it means...
