Movie Left-Wing Agenda in Cinema/TV

GG.exe

Killer on the Road ™
Sep 6, 2005
99,103
52,738
in every girl's wet dream ℠
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Ravens-Dolphins Hurricanes-Terps
I don’t mean Disney bleeding. I mean proof that they are making films to appease this new age socialist agenda you talk about.
That's obvious and doesn't need proving, because you can rifle off a litany of recent movies that are agenda-focused.
I can't believe you'd need proof of that.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Kirby

This man is confused
Oct 10, 2007
13,825
19,079
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
That's obvious and doesn't need proving, because you can rifle off a litany of recent movies that are agenda-focused.
I can't believe you'd need proof of that.
There’s always been films focused on agendas since day dot of film making.

Do you think Hollywood moguls would purposely make films to push a political agenda over making films that make them money. Isn’t it more likely that they are trying to make films that they think people want in order to make more money?
 

HahnPremium

Club Legend
Jun 19, 2008
1,430
1,513
Melbourne
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
There’s always been films focused on agendas since day dot of film making.

Do you think Hollywood moguls would purposely make films to push a political agenda over making films that make them money. Isn’t it more likely that they are trying to make films that they think people want in order to make more money?
Dont think they are mutually exclusive. Whilst the primary motive is to make money, one sure fire way of achieving this is by tapping into the current populist zeitgeist.
 

Kirby

This man is confused
Oct 10, 2007
13,825
19,079
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
Dont think they are mutually exclusive. Whilst the primary motive is to make money, one sure fire way of achieving this is by tapping into the current populist zeitgeist.
I agree with this.

I just don’t think that they are pushing a liberal agenda for political purposes. It’s all about the money.

More females will go see their films if they are playing more prominent/powerful characters. Females are half the worlds population and have money too.
 

GG.exe

Killer on the Road ™
Sep 6, 2005
99,103
52,738
in every girl's wet dream ℠
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Ravens-Dolphins Hurricanes-Terps
I agree with this.

I just don’t think that they are pushing a liberal agenda for political purposes. It’s all about the money.

More females will go see their films if they are playing more prominent/powerful characters. Females are half the worlds population and have money too.
watch the video i posted tho. the guy talks about what his fiance said about a few lines from the trailer that rubbed HER wrong....and an example of the agenda going on.
 

HahnPremium

Club Legend
Jun 19, 2008
1,430
1,513
Melbourne
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
I think the sticking point is the way it is done. Work hard and diligently and creatively to write more powerful female characters. Characters that stand on their own through powerful writing rather than a lazy means of a character having to verbalise constantly "I am a powerful female character".
Im exaggerrating a tad obviously and not saying its all like that but I think thats the crux of the matter.
Clever impactful writing of characters regardless of gender and not lazy writing using cliche obvious sentiments to make the differentiation.
 

EFC 1871

Hall of Famer
Oct 11, 2007
30,362
11,648
AFL Club
Essendon
yep, the Bond franchise was made for a white male, and other cultures converted the concept for their own race. Like Shaft, and theres probably a Korean one made in Korea. But imagine if Shaft suddenly became a bearded white dude.
You understand why people would react differently, though, right?
 

Richard Pryor

Norm Smith Medallist
Feb 6, 2013
8,347
10,890
AFL Club
Hawthorn
The idea that multimillionaire studio owners are woke, leftie, SJWs and not capitalist money makers is hilarious.
I wish this fact would stop people from acting like corporate pandering is legitimate progressive activism (not a callout of anyone on here, just something I've observed. Mostly on the godforsaken wasteland of Facebook). It's kind of similar to how Christians feel obligated to pretend they like Christian rock and faith based films.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Richard Pryor

Norm Smith Medallist
Feb 6, 2013
8,347
10,890
AFL Club
Hawthorn
There’s always been films focused on agendas since day dot of film making.

Do you think Hollywood moguls would purposely make films to push a political agenda over making films that make them money. Isn’t it more likely that they are trying to make films that they think people want in order to make more money?
Random example would be films like the Power of One and Lethal Weapon 2 (I think) which pushed a hardline anti-apartheid agenda. I think the filmmakers legitimately had an issue with apartheid they wanted to communicate, but the funding for the films was likely due to the suits observing the way the wind of public opinion was blowing and looking to cash in.
 

IKnowtheDog

Norm Smith Medallist
Jan 25, 2016
6,187
4,923
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Seattle Seahawks
Charlie Baltimore is one of the great female action heroes in a great action movie yet doesn’t seem to get the recognition she deserves IMHO
 

Kirby

This man is confused
Oct 10, 2007
13,825
19,079
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
Do women really crave seeing women action heroes beating up bad guys (or girls)? Is this really a thing?
I think they enjoy seeing powerful women in a variety of ways. I doubt the majority have the same blood lust as men do though.

I've no doubt that they get sick of seeing women as largely being the victims though, and worse being the damsel in distress.
 

Bostonian

Brownlow Medallist
Sep 9, 2015
10,891
10,276
AFL Club
Carlton
More females will go see their films if they are playing more prominent/powerful characters. Females are half the worlds population and have money too.
Sport has proven this line of thought is misguided.

Women make up half the nation's population but more women watch male sports than the female version even when provided with a choice.

The same goes for movies.

Men don't go to movies to see male empowered movies, just as a great many women don't give a toss about all this female empowerment movement and don't want to sit through movies like that.
 

Rusty Brookes

Premiership Player
Aug 9, 2001
4,752
4,486
Preston
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Hawthorn, Manningham Cobras
Captain Marvel took in over $1 billion and is the 7th most successful Marvel movie.


Avengers:End Game featured a wide diversity of characters and is the highest grossing movie of all time.

Seems like people do go to movies with strong female characters. Who would have thunk it?

BTW UFC 193 (highest crowd ever for the company) was headlined by Rhonda Rousey vs Holly Holm.
 

Fwoy

Norm Smith Medallist
Mar 4, 2002
9,971
8,653
In a state of flux
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Liverpool
Captain Marvel took in over $1 billion and is the 7th most successful Marvel movie.


Avengers:End Game featured a wide diversity of characters and is the highest grossing movie of all time.

Seems like people do go to movies with strong female characters. Who would have thunk it?

BTW UFC 193 (highest crowd ever for the company) was headlined by Rhonda Rousey vs Holly Holm.

Avengers Endgame was the culmination of a (19?) movie series. Captain Marvel was kinda shoe-horned in just before. As I said earlier, I am not a Marvel movie watcher, so I can’t comment much more than that.

I’ll re-phrase what I was asking. Women, traditionally, have not been the target audience of action movies. If given a choice, traditionally, women would prefer a drama or rom-com...broadly speaking. My question is, do women suddenly chose action films because it’s a female lead kicking ass? Is that the reason, traditionally, they have not been into this genre?

Again, I stress, I couldn’t care less who is the lead, male or female etc...just curious
 

Rusty Brookes

Premiership Player
Aug 9, 2001
4,752
4,486
Preston
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Hawthorn, Manningham Cobras
Since we're going on anecdote, my wife hates rom-coms and would much prefer an action movie or a horror or sci-fi, etc. Maybe it's the circles I move in but she's very much not alone in that choice among the females I know. So sure, there are women that love their rom-coms but there are plenty that don't. I don't think she really cares whether the lead is a male or female - which I think is the point.

And I go back a point I made originally - I don't think having a woman as a lead means the movie is targetted to women. Sheesh - I grew up watching Lynda Carter as Wonder Woman and there were plenty of males watching. It's a reflection of the society that we live in (well I see it that way) to show different people in different roles.

I'm also old enough to remember when DC introduced Black Vulcan, Apache Chief, El Dorado and Samurai to Challenge of the Superfriends to reflect the diversity of kids watching at the time. That was 1978 so this is hardly anything new.
 

sorted

Norm Smith Medallist
Aug 21, 2016
5,594
7,100
AFL Club
Geelong
I just don’t think that they are pushing a liberal agenda for political purposes. It’s all about the money.

More females will go see their films if they are playing more prominent/powerful characters. Females are half the worlds population and have money too.
I don't think this is true. At the Melbourne Supernova this year they did a poll of the audience asking which was their favourite Marvel movie. The girls voted for anything starring Chris Hemsworth. Margaret Pomeranz was supposedly high brow but always gave a higher score to movies with a handsome male lead who took his shirt off.
 
Last edited:

bourbons

Norm Smith Medallist
Mar 1, 2007
8,521
5,621
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
Two things.

Superhero movies have little resemblance to the real world. They rely on characters having supernatural powers that fluctuate hugely in power in order to create dramatic tension.

Recently we have recently seen movies depict tiny female characters destroying large male characters. Which is clearly unrealistic.

Combine the two and we see supernatural female kickass characters.
And? So what? Traditionally its been supernatural male kickass characters doing clearly unrealistic stuff. And female examples are still in the minority.
 

Top Bottom