Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
McCartney for me, no question. Lennon was never much of a songwriter.
McCartney very easily for me.McCartney for me, no question. Lennon was never much of a songwriter.
I didn't vote, but Lennon is miles better.I started a poll on this 2 weeks ago.
Lennon easily. Very easily.
A feeling I can't hide, oh no. OH NO! Cracking song."I Gotta Feeling" the music board's turned into The Beatles board. (Pun intended).
Post of the thread. Good point on the bolded partA feeling I can't hide, oh no. OH NO! Cracking song.
Lennon had a bit of a darker tone to most of his songs than McCartney. McCartney's melodies were usually catchier and I think he got better as time went on, to the point where he made better tunes than Lennon. Both were awesome, but Paul just wins.
How can you split them??
Musically Paul, Lyrically John
I think Paul's music had more variation to it, hard rockers, acoustic ballads, meaningful lyrics, throwaway lyrics, so he tried a bit of everything. John just seemed to be either a dark and meaningful song, or an idiotic song (e.g. Why don't we do it on the road, or everybody's got something to hide except for me and my monkey)
They're both more than impressive, but I prefer Paul's stuff.
You're all so picky.Whoops
Well when you're trying to criticise Johns writing style, probably best not to use one of Pauls songs as an example.You're all so picky.
They did split and Lennon wrote the better music.How can you split them??