geelongempire
Debutant
- Jul 31, 2017
- 53
- 73
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Could be a good option to have!!! Not saying he'd be in our best team though!!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could be a good option to have!!! Not saying he'd be in our best team though!!!!
Me thinks Taylor up forward has the "back up" marking forward option ATM. We need a better option than him if we are going to trade a player in.
He has a fantastic leap and very sticky hands - rarely drops them once he gets his hands on the pill.
His conversion has varied a lot :
2014 15 goals @58% from 19 games
2015 24 goals @67% from 16 games
2016 18 goals @50% from 20 games
2017 34 goals @65% from 22 games
2018 12 goals @55% from 10 games
Looks like he's best in odd number years - 2019 could be good
Suggestions?
As promising as Sav was he's 20 years old and kicked 7.7 from 8 Games, not sure a side going for a flag can run with a kid at CHF, think he needs to be the third string that can rotate into the ruck for mine.CHF's don't come cheap. I doubt there is one out there better than Taylor who is available/affordable. And Taylor is no world beater.
Harry just happens to be on our list and under employed down back (I hope ).
Realistically Esava is the main man. Taylor in support probably with maybe a young KP draftee and a State leaguer added with fingers crossed.
Casboult won't come to be cover, he could go to a side like Hawthorn and play Round 1.If we can get a pick in the 60s for Smith and on trade it for Casboult i can deal with it as we get ruck and forward cover. I wish we had better KPF options than this though.
His kicking isn't really as bad as people make out, he kicked 24.12 in 2015 and 34.18 in 2017, we'd take that output for the pick he would cost for sure.
If we can get a pick in the 60s for Smith and on trade it for Casboult i can deal with it as we get ruck and forward cover. I wish we had better KPF options than this though.
Is Smith in play? I don't remember anything hinting at that?If we can get a pick in the 60s for Smith and on trade it for Casboult i can deal with it as we get ruck and forward cover. I wish we had better KPF options than this though.
Is Smith in play? I don't remember anything hinting at that?
Casboult won't come to be cover, he could go to a side like Hawthorn and play Round 1.
Would honestly rather Sav if we got that desperate, Casboult is exposed massively around the ground when in the ruck.I meant he comes as a KPF but if say Stanley gets injured you can use him in the ruck for a few weeks so Sav doesn't have to.
Bombing it long like we do would actually suit him, hes never really been a player that leads up the ground.Would like to see him take a mark with our mids kicking it in. We got the worst I50s in the universe.lol
Would like to see him take a mark with our mids kicking it in. We got the worst I50s in the universe.lol
Would honestly rather Sav if we got that desperate, Casboult is exposed massively around the ground when in the ruck.
We need someone who can kick it to one. No more Dangerfield long bombs to nowhere!Smallest forwards also so what's that tell you about the i50 dilemma.
We need a marking tall!
We need someone who can kick it to one. No more Dangerfield long bombs to nowhere!