Remove this Banner Ad

like my new avatar?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

londontiger said:
Fiora = H Black = Simmonds

I think the tigers did well out of this. Fiora can play, but whether St Kilda will make use of him is yet to be seen.

Knobel = Free.

Thats the difference. Knobel is a good trying ruckman, that we picked up for NOTHING. Even if he is used as a pinch hitting bash and crash ruckman the tigers have won out of this.


Not all tigers supporters need be tarred with the same brush, just the same as not all St Kilda supporters are supporting of Gehrig missing the dunny. :rolleyes:
good tryting ******* ruckman is knobel
 
good ******* tryting ruckman knoble i am, sounds like yoda speak
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

garth p said:
Will especially look forward to kicking your a r$e$ back to that miserable Punt Road hole.

If you guys are really paying Knobel $250,000.00 per annum you are seriously phucked in the head.

The new ruck rules will effectively make guys like Knobel redundant .

Tough t itties. :p

250k?

Where'd you hear that champ?

I heard 150k - 170k
 
Snickers said:
and hes costing you $160,000 a year. Richmond are pathetic.

Your an idiot.

How much do you think Ackland is costing you? $110 odd k? To get a AFL standard ruckman at 24 for 150 odd k is a very good deal for the club.

Richmond are pathetic, pffft.

Mirror?
 
londontiger said:
All you have to do is get Hamill on a proper contract, and you can keep the talent of all the kids together.

Whats Hamill on?

5 year contract for a bloke that looks very shaky...
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Bentleigh said:
No... not really.

For a ruckman of AFL standard, 24 years of age with alot going for him its a very good price.
AFL standard.........?????????? HAHAHAHAHA.

I am starting to believe that you have never seen Knobel play.
 
i would like to wish all saint supporters a merry christmas and happy new year.good luck for the 2005 season! :)
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

sainters said:
Bentleigh u seem to spend more time on the Saints board than the Richmond board :confused:

No, I dont. :)

Have a look at the Richmond board and see that you are wrong. True thou, I do post here abit due to Knoble.

Snickers said:
AFL standard.........?????????? HAHAHAHAHA.

I am starting to believe that you have never seen Knobel play.

I beleive he is AFL standard. If you disagree say why.
 
tigerboyz said:
i would like to wish all saint supporters a merry christmas and happy new year.good luck for the 2005 season! :)

Sh*t a post from a Richmond supporter that didn't have the 2 words Trent Knoble :p Merry Christmas to all, Hopefully Santa brings me a Saints Premiership :D
 
Bentleigh said:
No, I dont. :)

Have a look at the Richmond board and see that you are wrong. True thou, I do post here abit due to Knoble.



I beleive he is AFL standard. If you disagree say why.
Because Knobel is slow, un co-ordinated, doesnt mark, cant kick, cant handball and all of that is when he gets the ball, HE NEVER GETS IT!! thats why!
 
Snickers said:
Because Knobel is slow, un co-ordinated, doesnt mark, cant kick, cant handball and all of that is when he gets the ball, HE NEVER GETS IT!! thats why!
well you guys snapped up ackland and we wanted him so we only had three ruckman left knobel,mckee,porter and there
is no doubt knobel is better than the other two.only time will tell if we have made a mistake but i'm sure wallace will improve knobel's possesion rate and quality.
 
tigerboyz said:
well you guys snapped up ackland and we wanted him so we only had three ruckman left knobel,mckee,porter and there
is no doubt knobel is better than the other two.only time will tell if we have made a mistake but i'm sure wallace will improve knobel's possesion rate and quality.
nothing will make knobel get more of the ball, or mark. he really is hopeless.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom