Line up/Changes v Richmond

[tigerfan12]

Am I alone, or is this beginning to look like one of those "season defining" games?
If I was a Richmond supporter I would be pretty confident going in this week to be honest. But we need to take a leaf out of West Coasts book (I cannot believe i just said that) as they did losing two of their best in Kerr and Embley yesterday.
Our "outs" would look something like this if at Tigerland:
WATSON = NEWMAN (even)
HOCKING = MARTIN (martin much better)
WINDERLICH = COTCHIN ( lol)
DEMPSEY = NAHAS (even)
HURLEY = REIWOLDT (close to right)
STANTON = FOLEY (lol)
WELSH = DELEDIO (hahahahahaha)
and lets not forget Gumbleton and Pears.
So if we can hold off the Tigers this week, it will be our best win of the year so far IMO.

Try again mate

 

[Kong]

Wait, Newman's as good as Watson?

McVeigh's as good as Martin, too, I guess.

 

[tigerfan12]

Wait, Newman's as good as Watson?

McVeigh's as good as Martin, too, I guess.

ok ill give you watson , but not by a lot .... mcveigh and martin though ? come on.

 

[Kong]

Now I know you're taking the piss.

Newman isn't even comparable.

None of your players bar Riewoldt are.

 

[sikmoe]

ok ill give you watson , but not by a lot .... mcveigh and martin though ? come on.

LOL, wow is newman really rated that highly by Richmond fans?

 

[tigerfan12]

might want to watch newman play a bit i think, and i already said watson was better and once again he is not that much better.

 

[theboxmike]

might want to watch newman play a bit i think, and i already said watson was better and once again he is not that much better.

Obviously hasn't watched Watson play this year

 

[Gentlemen]

Watson and Newman are two completely different players, why are we comparing them?

Watson and Foley is more to the truth, even Watson and Cotchin.

Watson is easily better than any of our midfielders (for now), he does have experiance on his side.

 

[eth-dog]

Out: Hocking, Watson
In: Stanton, Dyson

Fletcher-Hooker-Hardingham
Hibberd-Myers-Heppell
Stanton-Howlett-Dyson
Jetta-Ryder-Monfries
Crameri-Hille-Reimers
Bellchambers-Lonergan-Zaharakis
McVeigh-Colyer-Melksham
Lovett-Murray (sub)

 

[smasha]

am i alone, or is this beginning to look like one of those "season defining" games?
If i was a richmond supporter i would be pretty confident going in this week to be honest. But we need to take a leaf out of west coasts book (i cannot believe i just said that) as they did losing two of their best in kerr and embley yesterday.
Our "outs" would look something like this if at tigerland:
Watson = newman
hocking = martin
winderlich = cotchin
dempsey = nahas
hurley = reiwoldt
stanton = foley
welsh = deledio
and lets not forget gumbleton and pears.
So if we can hold off the tigers this week, it will be our best win of the year so far imo.

hahahaha.

 

[Yoda_]

If Newman was playing in a good side he would be rated far more highly.

True leader, great player

 

[Bombers1234]

Ins: Stanton, Dyson
Out: Hocking, Watson

Hibberd Fletcher Hardingham
Dyson Hooker Heppell
Jetta Lonergan Stanton
Monfries Ryder Zaharakis
Reimers Hille Crameri
Bellchambers Myers McVeigh
Melksham Howlett NLM sub: Colyer

 

[commonwealth]

hahahaha.

Mate, some of them listed are terrible comparisons i agree but most are under selling our players mate hence the ladder positions.

 

[kelvin_sheedy]

Ins: Stanton, Dyson
Outs: Watson, Hocking

Dyson back, NLM and McVeigh into the midfield rotations.

 

[Jivin Jackel]

I'm fairly confident Prismal will play this week.

 

[Ben the Gooner]

In: Stanton, Dyson, Welsh (Prismall)
Out: Watson, Hocking, Colyer

B: Hibberd - Hooker - Dyson
HB: Hardingham - Fletcher - Heppell
C: Stanton - Howlett - Melksham
HF: Jetta - Hille - Monfries
F: Crameri - Ryder - Zaharakis
R: Bellchambers - Lonergan - Myers
I: NLM - McVeigh - Welsh/Prismall
S: Reimers

Not sure what the deal with Welsh in, but given the outs, he makes perfect sense to be an in if he's fit.

Welsh to captain if fit, Stanton if not.

 

[Super Gusto]

In. Stanton, Hurley (If fit)
Out. Hocking, Watson

Myers to rotate through the middle.

If Hurley doesn;t pull up then Dyson should come in. Should be ahead of Prismal.

 

[lamaros]

B: Dyson Fletcher Hardingham
HB: Heppell Hooker Hibberd
C: Jetta Myers Stanton
HF: Monfries Crameri Zaharakis
F: Reimers Hille Ryder
R: Bellchambers McVeigh Howlett

B: Lonergan Melksham NLM Prismall

In: Stanton, Dyson, Prismall
Out: Watson, Hocking, Colyer

EMG: ???, Colyer, Davey

Hurley an outside chance to make the side. Would be good to see him in, he gives us more flexibility than Hibberd, and could release NLM to the wing/mid/forward.

 

[Darealrath]

Ins: Stanton, Dyson
Outs: Watson, Hocking

Dyson back, NLM and McVeigh into the midfield rotations.

Agree.

 

[DVD Player]

Who will captain? Hille?

 

[Darealrath]

Who will captain? Hille?

Lovett-Murray I reckon.

 

[Ben the Gooner]

Hille's not in the leadership group. With Watto, Buddha and Woosha out, it'd be Stanton or Spike I'd say.

 

[silk]

Ins: Stanton, Dyson
Outs: Watson, Hocking

Dyson back, NLM and McVeigh into the midfield rotations.

I would swap dyson for slattery if he is fit, but agree with the parts about NLM and McVeigh.

Maybe look at bringing in Williams, and pushing zaka into the midfield.

 

[kelvin_sheedy]

Slattery has already been ruled out.

 

[coleman10]

I was merley trying to say that if you were to take 7 or 8 of Richmonds best players out, how would you expect they go? The examples were thrown together and in no apparent order of comparison. Just making a point. Apologies for not "spelling it out for y'all"... Next time I will ramble on like most of you on here who obviously have nothing better to do.