He came across as representing some supporter group that as far as I could determine, didn't exist.
A lonewolf, lone ranger, trying to save those who didn't need him to save them. Either that, or given his past, just a 'board whore' desperate to put something on his CV.
Personally, I didn't advocate for Chris, but I think the above is unfair and nothing more than a cheap shot.
I wouldn't know / recognise the man if I passed him in the street, but he obviously loves the club enough to want to make a difference, regardless whether any of us think it is a misguided approach or a platform we don't agree.




