List ages, according to Rohan Connolly in the age:
My question - is this correct?
My own calculations below, with and without rookies
the age column is
"(today's date - DOB) * 365.25 "
the average speaks for itself.
Apologies for the formatting
with rookies
without rookies
As you can see, they differ, quite a bit. You'd expect my actual number to be one day different, given his article was published on the 1st and I used the 2nd, but the difference between the two lists is given as 255 days on his list, and only 113 days on mine (41 without rookies).
My numbers copied straight, as one slab, from footywire, which is generally accurate.
Any help?
My question - is this correct?
My own calculations below, with and without rookies
the age column is
"(today's date - DOB) * 365.25 "
the average speaks for itself.
Apologies for the formatting
with rookies
without rookies
As you can see, they differ, quite a bit. You'd expect my actual number to be one day different, given his article was published on the 1st and I used the 2nd, but the difference between the two lists is given as 255 days on his list, and only 113 days on mine (41 without rookies).
My numbers copied straight, as one slab, from footywire, which is generally accurate.
Any help?
