We don't lack small or medium defenders, hard no on Wilson
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

I rate Boyd, but I understand that line-breaking speed is a weakness of his, alongside aerial ability. Keeps his feet in a contest though, so that means shorter time to recover to the next sprint/contest.Yeah, will just add him to the list of players you don't rate, while the club does
And the players, Willo, Dow, Fog, that you did rate and stated countless times they were better options than players that are/were in the best 22
If you look back through my posting history across here and another website, you'll find I wanted Scrimshaw, Setterfield, Ainsworth, and McCluggage in the 2016 Draft, and was also keen on us trading down (or trading up) to get Simpkin. I expressed concerns about SPS' ability to be a balanced mid at the next level, and I expressed concerns about the state of his hamstrings. SPS pre-hamstring injuries was looking like a generational winger.You forgot the continuous "bullish on SPS".
Still it can't be easy considering yourself a better tactician than Voss, a better recruiter Than Austin, and a better conditioning coach than Russell (particularly knowledge of running gaits).
So why do small forwards kick all the goals against usWe don't lack small or medium defenders, hard no on Wilson
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
So why do small forwards kick all the goals against us
Fantastic reasoning and analysis, definitely no hint of commentary for the sake of like farming. Thanks for posting!I’ll bet my left one Newman won’t be going anywhere….
Also NO to Wilson..

Sorry, missed this yesterday: this is total bullshit... both selections were surrounded with midfield picks. We may have reached for those particular players - to which I agree - but it wasn't a reach to pick a midfielder.Shades of our abortive draft campaigns to solve our ruck problems and our KPP problems under rogers and hughes. We desperately needed mids and so we went for mids - even though they werent the best players. But I, guess it beats drafting HBF's continuously
This absolutely.We don't lack small or medium defenders, hard no on Wilson
Best 22 players get traded all the time. What's your point?
No way Clarkson takes Dow
If Clarkson gets his mate Rath from StK (the kicking coach), he could turn Dow around.Can’t kick, you don’t play in a Clarkson team.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Like farming?? Yeah nah not for meFantastic reasoning and analysis, definitely no hint of commentary for the sake of like farming. Thanks for posting!
And you're definitely the only one in this thread doing that... yup...![]()
Jy Simpkin in trouble then....Can’t kick, you don’t play in a Clarkson team.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Completely understand everyone's basic reasoning, but still feel the current conversations around many players - both negative and positive - remains a bit delusional.
I called the issues with our list, with our 22, with our gameplan from very early in the season, and it never abated. We need a lot of work at every level of the football department to become a genuine contender.
Teams of the calibre we hope to beat can currently pick us apart even when we're putting in season high levels of pressure on them. Imagine thinking we'd win finals in the same scenarios, when they won't sit around and wait for us to make mistakes as much because they don't have to pace their way through the season.
Acres 50/50 at best. Freo have a fair bit of juggling to do with Lobb/Jackson.Is Acres looking likely? And what’s the situation with Stocker?
Can’t kick, you don’t play in a Clarkson team.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
His kicking is good enough now, I'd be working on understanding why he's weighting his handballs less accurately, and how he can learn to do more in terms of gauging when to go 100% effort, versus say 70-90%.If Clarkson gets his mate Rath from StK (the kicking coach), he could turn Dow around.
Fair enough on the first point, the second point is just me highlighting that like any education path today, there's still a lot that can be done to enhance that for everyone. We can always learn to communicate ideas and concepts better and faster.Like farming?? Yeah nah not for me
Just don’t agree with most of the rubbish you put up and for mostly just to cause arguments
You’re like Dermie, over analyse everything to the extreme to try and sound intelligent..
Fogarty is not quick and has failed to cement a spot at two clubs, l don't see any mismanagement with him.So many posts interwoven in the discussion that are hidden for me, so I'm drawn to comment in order to appropriately engage the overall discussion thread.
I rate Boyd, but I understand that line-breaking speed is a weakness of his, alongside aerial ability. Keeps his feet in a contest though, so that means shorter time to recover to the next sprint/contest.
Williamson clearly was rated, but clearly got mishandled, as did/does Dow. Both remain a good chance to turn things around, it's just that Williamson won't be doing it at this club. We're talking about a largely unchallenged sporting league here with a club that has clearly been high on its own supply for three decades, not a decent environment for professional development. There's plenty of evidence of that, and there's still more to be done to improve that.
I wanted Fogarty a year earlier than we got him, and I wanted him played as a midfielder who rests forward, which never happened. The game evolved a bit, but he was never really developed here the way he should have been. Hilarious that when we needed speed in corridor transition, we ignored a guy who had brought that in spades his entire junior and senior career.
His defensive pressure was also excellent when playing forward, and I would have preferred him over Owies through the second half of the year.
If you look back through my posting history across here and another website, you'll find I wanted Scrimshaw, Setterfield, Ainsworth, and McCluggage in the 2016 Draft, and was also keen on us trading down (or trading up) to get Simpkin. I expressed concerns about SPS' ability to be a balanced mid at the next level, and I expressed concerns about the state of his hamstrings. SPS pre-hamstring injuries was looking like a generational winger.
We made a bet that no one else was willing to make, and it backfired spectacularly. What you're recalling is me discussing this as we looked to trade him. I was bullish on him in terms of his potential output if his hamstrings could be genuinely fixed, and clearly the medical advice was no.
Was also keen on Bolton, Hayward, Drew, Atley, Williams and Rotham for our second pick. Not all winners I grant you, but I was also far less bullish on Will Brodie, Venables, McGrath, Taranto, Perryman, Fisher and Powell-Pepper than others at the time, and that's largely been vindicated.
Brodie was a limited but powerful inside mid, and you can see in the right environment and hard work on his weaknesses, he has flourished. I think the same basic principles can be applied to Dow, though perhaps not at a football club that had failed at development for so long that stench fills Dow's nose still. That new development setup is also a work in progress, not that any team should stop seeking to innovate.
I would. Not enough love...This. We won’t get anywhere near the draft equity we paid for Dow in a trade. Plowman was also a pick 3, but no one would expect a first rounder for him in a trade.
If you get 2:1 on that, what are you gonna do with three left nuts?I’ll bet my left one Newman won’t be going anywhere….
Also NO to Wilson..
Yep, loved Fogarty at the draft. His underage games were exceptional. Wasn’t the star, but sort of the fabric that bound. Work rate, tackling, connection work in close, did the hard yards for his team. Pretty much didn’t grow post under 18’s. All the traits are there, star at the lower level, but the old “can’t kick over a jam jar” was written for Fog, limiting his forward creds. Pretty much midfield or bust for Fog and he doesn’t have the physical attributes to mix it at the top level consistently.Fogarty is not quick and has failed to cement a spot at two clubs, l don't see any mismanagement with him.
A good reserves players who lacks in a number of areas at the top level.