- Apr 20, 2006
- 9,151
- 12,214
- AFL Club
- Carlton
To leave Richmond I imagine a first rounder and $800kStuff Amon, give Baker what he wants if ms3s rumour has got legs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
To leave Richmond I imagine a first rounder and $800kStuff Amon, give Baker what he wants if ms3s rumour has got legs.
Forget which footy show I watched but he was on it and very much implied that North and he may be open to a mutually beneficial split. North have Xeri, Coleman Jones and Edwards they need to start getting games into.. Goldy would be looking to chase a flag rather than a pay day so would fit in perfectly for us.
Re: incoming stop gap ruckman
I can’t see how it can work…
How do we continue playing/developing tdk as a ruck/forward and playing Pitto and playing another stop gap ruckman like say Goldstein for example?
For me it’s more about what happens if TDK gets injured. In another 12 months TDK should be mature enough to be a number one ruck.Why do we have to play Pitto? If TDKs role in the side was ruck/forward any new ruckman would only be competing with Pitto for a spot in the side, provided they were all fit.
A player like Goldy for example or a Steph Martin type this year would have been great, they compete for the number 1 ruck spot, they work in tandem with TDK, when one of the main rucks is injured the other picks up the slack, in the event of Harry or Charlie getting injured, you can play TDK as a key forward and maintain two good marking options.
I don’t understand the thought process of people who say you can’t recruit a Goldy type as how would Pitto or Mirkov feel, they would feel the same way the midfield group felt when we recruited Cerra and Hewett, as the team gets stronger competition for spots will get tougher.
Id love another capable ruck, two on the list was a mistake and I think TDK shouldn’t be the main ruck as he could be a solid forward option.
I guess it comes down to how much the club wants to spend on rucks. Playing Pitto in the vfl for another 2 years and then tdk and Mirkov probably take over. In this case Pitto plays vfl and is cover for injuries.Why do we have to play Pitto? If TDKs role in the side was ruck/forward any new ruckman would only be competing with Pitto for a spot in the side, provided they were all fit.
A player like Goldy for example or a Steph Martin type this year would have been great, they compete for the number 1 ruck spot, they work in tandem with TDK, when one of the main rucks is injured the other picks up the slack, in the event of Harry or Charlie getting injured, you can play TDK as a key forward and maintain two good marking options.
I don’t understand the thought process of people who say you can’t recruit a Goldy type as how would Pitto or Mirkov feel, they would feel the same way the midfield group felt when we recruited Cerra and Hewett, as the team gets stronger competition for spots will get tougher.
Id love another capable ruck, two on the list was a mistake and I think TDK shouldn’t be the main ruck as he could be a solid forward option.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion. He may not be a superstar ruck, but will be a very valuable player. Think Rory Lobb is closest comparison of his minimum base that comes to mind. But with a much better leap.
I have more hope that he will become a quality ruck than you and others. There are gaps in his developmnent from both a physical and craft point of view. His pre seasons have been compromised right through. He seems to periodically succumb to medium term injury early in the season. I suspect it is from attempting a heavy workload. It doesn’t mean he is not capable of a heavy workload going forward. Most people who have subjected them to a rigorous (on the edge) physical program, will attest that during this time you are prone to some ridiculous “innocuous” injuries doing basic day to day tasks as the result of fatigue from conditioning work.
With the Covid interruptions over the last few years, physical development has been far from linear for most. Similarly, specialist coaches are or at least have been less accessible. I also question his coaching from our “Tractor” Kreuzer. So much similarity between MK and Pitto, but TDK a whole different kettle of fish. I believe he needs some layers added to his craft, that I wonder if big K has the experience and nous for.
Have been trying to visualise a fair comparison to a possible ceiling for Tom. For the oldies, if he can gain a little more awareness and expand his hitting zone, I came up with Simon Madden.
It is way too early to write him off at 22, but does have some work to do to realise his undoubted potential. If he becomes a potent third tall, second ruck, that is OK, but still has layers and physical development to add, let’s wait a couple of years before making outlandish negative claims of his worth.
The ideal stop gap is someone good enough to come in when needed but not too good to be upset biding time in VFL.Re: incoming stop gap ruckman
I can’t see how it can work…
How do we continue playing/developing tdk as a ruck/forward and playing Pitto and playing another stop gap ruckman like say Goldstein for example?
This is the set up I see working.The ideal stop gap is someone good enough to come in when needed but not too good to be upset biding time in VFL.
Someone from state leagues is perhaps a better fit than a Goldstein type.
Note this post was offered BEFORE TDK faced down the league’s testing material in Darcy yesterday
Reckon we’ve got it right with Pittonet TDK and Mirkov as our rucks.
A KPF who can take a turn in the ruck via the draft would be nice going forward …
Someone like Casboult
We always needed a younger, more mobile version. At any rate, he got in the way of our other forwards, at least under Teague.Someone like Casboult
I don’t think so, messes with the system that is working. Charlie, Harry and Tom provide good pressure for their size but, not the sort of elite pressure we have exhibited this year. Jack S as third tall and chop out works and the Mosquito fleet is doing just fine.Think we maybe talking about two different things mate...
Pittonet and TDK would both be playing.
Pittonet - #1 Ruck
TDK - Forward/ #2 Ruck
The old Goldy (type ruck) would be cover for if either were injured...
Would give Mirkov time to develop, because his still very raw...
And who wants to do that other than Preust!Stop gap ruckman would need to play VFL unless an injury…
So we can only have 3 rucks to the detriment of the seniors if there is an injury, so a VFL ruck Mirkov can get minutes? That makes no sense to me..
Most teams have 4 ruck options
Our team dynamic does not lend itself to sunset level stopgaps for mine. We have a dynamic young group growing together. If the club saw fit to trade someone in for coverage in emergency it should be a player on the verge of best 22 at their current club with some quality cameos behind them. I would look more at Adelaide young journeyman Billy Frampton who started as a forward/ruck at Port and has played some decent games as a key defender at the Crows. Joel Amartey at the Swans is a capable forward/ruck who is behind McLean of a similar age, veteran Reid, young gun Logan McDonald and Buddy, with Ladhams a big chance of sharing ruck duties and playing forward, behind Hickey.Never said I wanted just a stand alone ruck...
Meant all along I wanted a Goldy type "an old Ruck who can also play forward" (his role this year)
"I want a Ruck/Forward (TDK) type, not an undersized forward/ruck (JSOS type)"...
A Goldy, Phillips or that type who could pinch hit and play this role in the ruck or forward if we had an injury...
Only problem with them they'd probably want to play seniors...
Ideally I'd like a player that could help coach, also be injury insurance and primarily play as a 2nd ruck in the VFL...
A Kruezer would be perfect, but that ship has probably sailed...
Not against drafting another Ruck/Forward, to grow with Mirkov either...
Would give us great balance of 4 rucks... 2x Rucks (Pittonet & Mirkov) 2x Ruck Forwards (TDK & Drafted/Insurance ruck)
Most AFL teams have at least 4 ruckman...
Kreuzberg? Wtf? He is already coaching, at our club! Phillips is about the only relevant mention there. There is no way Nic Nat because a back up ruck next year. He is still elite!Phillips, Sinclair, NicNat, Goldy, Kruezer...
All OOC/retired and all are going to struggle to stay on a list next year...
Might jump at a coaching/cover for injuries role to stay on a list...
I would question how many teams have 4 AFL standard ruckman on their list, Melbourne was a good example Gawn goes down and they see Weideman as that forward/ruck option as better than a pure ruckman.Never said I wanted just a stand alone ruck...
Meant all along I wanted a Goldy type "an old Ruck who can also play forward" (his role this year)
"I want a Ruck/Forward (TDK) type, not an undersized forward/ruck (JSOS type)"...
A Goldy, Phillips or that type who could pinch hit and play this role in the ruck or forward if we had an injury...
Only problem with them they'd probably want to play seniors...
Ideally I'd like a player that could help coach, also be injury insurance and primarily play as a 2nd ruck in the VFL...
A Kruezer would be perfect, but that ship has probably sailed...
Not against drafting another Ruck/Forward, to grow with Mirkov either...
Would give us great balance of 4 rucks... 2x Rucks (Pittonet & Mirkov) 2x Ruck Forwards (TDK & Drafted/Insurance ruck)
Most AFL teams have at least 4 ruckman...
Our 4th ruck option needs to be a Levi type, play KF/2nd ruck in the 2s, and provide KPF/ruck/KPD coverage for the 1s.
That's a lot of assumptionsOr our 4th ruck could be a versatile ruck/forward/defensive playing coach like Goldstein, and Mirkov could mix ruck minutes with getting some experience and development in the back and forward lines as well, so that if/when he gets a senior gig he's not a completely one-dimensional player?
That's a lot of assumptions
That he's a good coach, to the point where we'd sack Kreuzer.What assumptions?
That he's a good coach, to the point where we'd sack Kreuzer.
That he's happy to play 2's, predominantly as a forward and be a back up.