When?Yet a similar model worked for another club
And don't say Melbourne again, it is clearly not a similar model.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When?Yet a similar model worked for another club
When?
And don't say Melbourne again, it is clearly not a similar model.
Like your comparison and they are defiantly the standard...
However, what the previous month has shown us, is if delivery is not spot on
or any of them are down on form the ball just rebounds out and they are exposed...
Also Gawn and Jackson are super athletic players who can ruck and play forward...
Pittonet and Goldy whilst good ruckman are only ruckman...
Ok, I would strongly argue that playing Durdin as a forward is a very different structure to playing both Goldstein and Pitto as rucks. And I really don't see us playing Durdin forward when we have those other 4 in the team.Yes, yes, Melbourne again, let's just shuffle some names
Not about the quality, just the possible structure
Brown - Harry
McDonald - Durdin
Fritsch - Charlie
Jackson - TDK
Gawn - Pitto
Bullen, Spargo, Pickett - Any of our 3 small forwards
Rather than Sparrow - Jsos
But you replied to posts that were specifically about him.I'm not talking about Goldstein, none of my posts today have mentioned him...
Yes, yes, Melbourne again, let's just shuffle some names
Not about the quality, just the possible structure
Brown - Harry
McDonald - Durdin
Fritsch - Charlie
Jackson - TDK
Gawn - Pitto
Bullen, Spargo, Pickett - Any of our 3 small forwards
Rather than Sparrow - Jsos
Durdin replaces GoldyBrown - Harry
McDonald - Curnow
Fritsch - JSOS
Jackson - TDK
Gawn - Pitt
Is more realistic.
Sparrow at 183cm is closer to Martin or Honey.
That structure doesn't work with two traditional ruckman like Pitt and Goldy. If Charlie is considered the third tall JSOS drops out.
Durdin replaces Goldy
Not too concerned with individual height, moreso overall mobility and structure.
You replied to posts about Goldstein coming and being picked ahead of them.I replied about the premise of players leaving, if we got another Ruck or Ruck/KPP for backup of injury...
Which I find to be nonsensical...
Think we can only play three of Harry, Charlie, JSOS and Durdin/McDonald, if Pitt and TDK continue to share the ruck load as we expect.
Silvagni's mobility as a traditional third tall is brilliant but would prefer a smaller pressure player if that is not his role.
Let's get back to the original point. Bringing in another tall (forget Goldy), that suits our setup, where we play taller as another club has shown by winning a flag, would not result in a player wanting out
Different types for sure, but think we also have an advantage with the likes of Harry. But, bringing in another "tall" as such, wouldn't cause a player wanting out
Another alternative
Brown - Harry
McDonald - Durdin
Fritsch - Charlie
Jackson - TDK
Gawn - Pitto
Bullen, Spargo, Pickett - Any of our 3 small forwards
Rather than Sparrow - Jsos
Still think we need to trade or draft another Ruck/ KPF or KPF...
Brown - Harry
McDonald - ???
Fritsch - Charlie
Jackson - TDK
Gawn - Pitto
Would prefer Durdin to play back...
May - Young
Lever - Weitering
Petty - Durdin
how the **** do you know what part teague played in any player's progress/improvement timeline? I'm tipping there would be numerous players who would say they learned from teague things that they are using now as the team improves and jells - when do the tiny-minded, past coach insults actually finish?Here another to ponder:
Who improved as a player under Teague?
Answer:No one
Now who has improved under Voss
or should I say HOW many have improved under Voss.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
My kingdom for a Casboult!Not sure about that. Said model looks very cumbersome and doesn't really leave any room for Jack to play.
I know that we are talking hypothetical but having Goldy. Pitto, TDK, Harry and Charlie running around in the same team would mean a lot of minutes for some on the bench and a lot of easy exits from our forward line.
Our depth at ruck has changed with the emergence of TDK. The club probably has to make a hard nosed decision of where Mirkov is tracking towards. If they genuinely believe that he will make it (as we keep hearing) we don't
Agree. Goldstein would be such a backward step its beyond a joke.
They actually key part is that the club needs to make an honest assessment as to where Mirkov is heading. If the club believes that he is going to make it (and that is the word that we are hearing) then we don't need another lumbering ruckman who can't play forward like Goldstein. We simply need a back up forward like Leigh Brown who can pinch hit in the ruck.
Not sure about Teague but I heard Del Santo on the radio on the weekend before the game and he was talking about how every player for the Blues, that he was looking at warming up, could arguably say they are having a career best year, Cripps included. So it's more a question of who hasn't appeared to improve this year, excluding those obviously spending plenty of time on the sideline. Not many come to mind.Here another to ponder:
Who improved as a player under Teague?
Answer:No one
Now who has improved under Voss
or should I say HOW many have improved under Voss.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
how the **** do you know what part teague played in any player's progress/improvement timeline? I'm tipping there would be numerous players who would say they learned from teague things that they are using now as the team improves and jells - when do the tiny-minded, past coach insults actually finish?
I think Young has shown us that he is capable of being our new jones/#2 KPD behind the master Weitering.I see our future ruck depth as, in order,
Pittonet, TDK, Mirkov, developing FWD/RUC, Durdin/McDonald, Young, JSOS.
Must recruit another tall defender to give us the flexibility to do this. I think in 12 months time Mirkov will be ready to cover a game here or there.
No to Goldy. Great player but not required.
how the **** do you know what part teague played in any player's progress/improvement timeline? I'm tipping there would be numerous players who would say they learned from teague things that they are using now as the team improves and jells - when do the tiny-minded, past coach insults actually finish?
I agree we don’t need to bash him , he’s gone but…how the **** do you know what part teague played in any player's progress/improvement timeline? I'm tipping there would be numerous players who would say they learned from teague things that they are using now as the team improves and jells - when do the tiny-minded, past coach insults actually finish?
I agree we don’t need to bash him , he’s gone but…
Unfortunately Thy , Voss’s arrival and the team/clubs rapid emergence has shown just how bloody ordinary Teague was