List Mgmt. List Management Thread

[Punchy Bassett]

Agreed. For fans to not be VERY happy with 3 very good trades and 2 excellent potential draft picks, I think I know what the issue is

I'm happy but surely the club can see we're short on ruck options? Unless we have someone planned for the rookie draft?

 

[Schulzycrow]

Look, I am very happy with our off-season. All the players before the draft, including Draper and Welsh, are hopefully long-term players for the club. Just think we could have swung the axe a bit more with this draft's calibre and the fact that the last glaring need is a ruck that can mature and be ready to step into ROB's shoes. Filthy should only be a part-time ruck, so we should put all our eggs in Murray Jr. or get the flop king from the Bombers next year. Maybe I'm a bit carried away with the previous post, but hey, it's BF.

 

[cmndstab]

I'm happy but surely the club can see we're short on ruck options? Unless we have someone planned for the rookie draft?

We won't be making any live selections in the rookie draft. It will just be picking up Burgess and Schoenberg again.

For whatever reason, the club decided we would only bring in five players this year. When we managed to land three trade targets, had pick 4 and also had a father/son locked away, that was it. Everything else is just administrative fluff to make the list line up.

 

[Ticky009]

Why do I get a new notification every time Ticky009 creates a new thread. This is weird.

Also, while I’m here, lmao at the chumps still complaining after this offseason.

Never change BigFooty.

EDIT: Nevermind, Ticky. I somehow had accidentally clicked watch on the entire Swans board.

Must have been drunk.

Hi RB, there is a known error in the Big Footy code. This means every time we create a new thread on our Board, we spam Big Footy. It's resulted in a default Watch setting for most users.

The post below by Chief explains how to unwatch and that will halt the issue. The defect is still ongoing so I would suggest everyone review the post and unwatch.

You might be watching the Sydney board without meaning to! Here's how to fix it.

If you received an alert for this thread, but do not sub to the Sydney board at all, just click here to fix it: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/forums/sydney.29/watch Some glitch in the matrix made a lot of people sub to the Sydney board, I guess. 🤷‍♂️ You can manage all of your watched...

www.bigfooty.com

regards Ticky

 

[Runnin Blue]

This also happened to me a earlier this year despite never having been on the swans board

Interesting. Come to think of it, I’ve never been to the Swans board either (that I can remember) except for earlier tonight to check what was happening with these notifications.

Some strange shenanigans.

 

[Runnin Blue]

Hi RB, there is a known error in the Big Footy code. This means every time we create a new thread on our Board, we spam Big Footy. It's resulted in a default Watch setting for most users.

The post below by Chief explains how to unwatch and that will halt the issue. The defect is still ongoing so I would suggest everyone review the post and unwatch.

You might be watching the Sydney board without meaning to! Here's how to fix it.

If you received an alert for this thread, but do not sub to the Sydney board at all, just click here to fix it: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/forums/sydney.29/watch Some glitch in the matrix made a lot of people sub to the Sydney board, I guess. 🤷‍♂️ You can manage all of your watched...

www.bigfooty.com

regards Ticky

Ah, ok. Thanks man.

EDIT: Sheesh. Swans always getting a leg up as usual…

 

[Mostyn]

He's either just realised it, or hes been overruled by committee vote a couple times and is ****ed off

Or they'll trade for one who's readymade, instead of having one sit on your list for years while they maybe develop (or not).

 

[Mostyn]

We needed to get Sweet before Port did particularly when Port also were trying to bring in Soldo the same trade period, we should have squeezed in and nabbed Sweet from under their nose

Yeah, agreed. That was a bit asleep at the wheel.

 

[Mostyn]

No... if we go into deficit then it comes off our 1st round pick next year, regardless of which round the bid comes in.

That isn't true anymore.

 

[Velvet George]

It's criminal that we have a spud like Strachan clogging our list and leave a local talented junior ruck sitting there when we could have easily traded back in to grab him.

Smith, Burgess, Strachan. 3 players that make our list better by not being on it.

Shit list management.

 

[Velvet George]

Or they'll trade for one who's readymade, instead of having one sit on your list for years while they maybe develop (or not).

Yeah, agreed. That was a bit asleep at the wheel.

lol, you couldn’t make this shit up. That was last year, another year gone by and same ruck stocks.

 

[Mostyn]

They posted it. They were wrong.

You have any evidence to support that?

There was quite a bit of coverage when it was changed, I believe in the Daicos year. Any reason why it was changed back?

 

[JennyTalia]

Why do I get a new notification every time Ticky009 creates a new thread. This is weird.

Also, while I’m here, lmao at the chumps still complaining after this offseason.

Never change BigFooty.

EDIT: Nevermind, Ticky. I somehow had accidentally clicked watch on the entire Swans board.

Must have been drunk.

This also happened to me with his threads so must be a bug.

 

[Firewalker]

Schoenberg is going to be put back on the main list tomorrow in the Pre-Season Draft

Someone in that list management department really doesn’t want to admit he’s going to be a bust…

(Don’t give me that give him a chance to recover from a bad injury - he didn’t come close to meeting professional standards off-field to start his career and has struggled to hit a target by foot most of his career even prior to the Achilles)

 

[Mostyn]

F U afc

Seriously?

It's a pick 53. There's random late rucks every year.

Did you say the same about Harry Barnett? Goad? Will Verrall?

There's always more ruckman than there is opportunity. Let's go get someone who is ready to go.

 

[Golumless]

Schoenberg is going to be put back on the main list tomorrow in the Pre-Season Draft

Someone in that list management department really doesn’t want to admit he’s going to be a bust…

(Don’t give me that give him a chance to recover from a bad injury - he didn’t come close to meeting professional standards off-field to start his career and has struggled to hit target by foot most of his career even prior to the Achilles)

Career 62% KE is pretty reliable for a half forward/midfielder.

Though, it is genuinely hard to see how he saves his career here.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Schoenberg is going to be put back on the main list tomorrow in the Pre-Season Draft

Someone in that list management department really doesn’t want to admit he’s going to be a bust…

(Don’t give me that give him a chance to recover from a bad injury - he didn’t come close to meeting professional standards off-field to start his career and has struggled to hit a target by foot most of his career even prior to the Achilles)

Surely we pick Schoenberg before Burgess...

 

[Velvet George]

Seriously?

It's a pick 53. There's random late rucks every year.

Did you say the same about Harry Barnett? Goad? Will Verrall?

There's always more ruckman than there is opportunity. Let's go get someone who is ready to go.

Again, why haven’t we done that the last 2 years when we’ve carried shit rucks!!

 

[spenze]

Look, I am very happy with our off-season. All the players before the draft, including Draper and Welsh, are hopefully long-term players for the club. Just think we could have swung the axe a bit more with this draft's calibre and the fact that the last glaring need is a ruck that can mature and be ready to step into ROB's shoes. Filthy should only be a part-time ruck, so we should put all our eggs in Murray Jr. or get the flop king from the Bombers next year. Maybe I'm a bit carried away with the previous post, but hey, it's BF.

Missed an opportunity to have a longer hit at it in the future. Borlase and Smith aren't going to be there in 2 more years

 

[Firewalker]

Surely we pick Schoenberg before Burgess...

Schoenberg PSD, Burgess is Rookie… both should’ve been let go.

Career 62% KE is pretty reliable for a half forward/midfielder.

Though, it is genuinely hard to see how he saves his career here.

Most of that has been from low disposal count at AFL level and on the outside as a wing or at half-forward, he’s been played out of position yes but still other than his debut year & 2021 hasn’t looked near it at AFL level. At SANFL level his % would be a lot lower.

 

[FR0GGY]

Nothing more exciting than waiting to pick up two average players who you know what they have to give.

 

[Schulzycrow]

Seriously?

It's a pick 53. There's random late rucks every year.

Did you say the same about Harry Barnett? Goad? Will Verrall?

There's always more ruckman than there is opportunity. Let's go get someone who is ready to go.

Yep, I did. See my later post. It would have cost us nothing, and now we will have to pay overs to get someone "ready to go"

 

[Golumless]

Schoenberg PSD, Burgess is Rookie… both should’ve been let go.


Most of that has been from low disposal count at AFL level and on the outside as a wing or at half-forward, he’s been played out of position yes but still other than his debut year & 2021 hasn’t looked near it at AFL level. At SANFL level his % would be a lot lower.

Out of position is a seriously overblown argument when dealing with smalls. If you can play midfield, you can play every small position effectively. It's just midfield with some parts not being as important.

That said, half forward is not a position that is typically conducive of good kicking, elite does sit at 70%. Now, his KE% would be lower at SANFL though, purely because he's played as an inside midfielder, which is arguably the single worst thing that can happen to someones kicking.

 

[Mostyn]

Yep, I did. See my later post. It would have cost us nothing, and now we will have to pay overs to get someone "ready to go"

Pay overs?

A second round pick can get you a decent ruckman every year.

You're far better off waiting and trading - the number of ruckman who become decent is pretty low, so why spend a pick on them so they can then sit on your list for four years until you know?

 

[Redline]

My main criticism is we should of had the list space for one more pick.

I struggle a bit to give credit for picking Draper. Fantastic pick-up but we got in the position to get him via a really poor year. I don't think its worthy of the club patting itself on the back too much.